In a joint statement earlier today (20 March), the Asian Forum for Human Rights and Development (FORUM-ASIA), together with the Solidarity for ASEAN Peoples’ Advocacy and the undersigned organisations, expressed grave concerns with the lack of a human rights focus in the current response to the ongoing COVID‐19 pandemic by the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) Members States.

As such, they call upon ASEAN Member States to place human rights and dignity as the core principles in addressing the pandemic, specifically by ensuring that any public health measures are taken in alignment with international human rights law and standards to ensure accountability and transparency in the handling of the situation.

They noted that is alarming that many ASEAN Member States have yet to adopt a clear communications strategy to inform the public on the situation, three months after the COVID‐19 outbreak. This notion was made following observation that ASEAN countries such as Indonesia, Myanmar, Laos, and the Philippines have delayed or limit the release of information to preserve their image.

Besides that, Myanmar, Thailand, and Singapore are actively use repressive laws such as national anti‐fake news laws to pursue misinformation, although this ultimately failed to quell public fear or doubt. According to the statement, this high‐handed approach risks public health and welfare, particularly for those with limited access to information and education. It mutes peoples’ legitimate expressions of doubt and query on the actual situation in their country and inspires more speculation and misinformation on the COVID‐19 situation in‐country.

Meanwhile, in Indonesia, President Joko Widodo initially encouraged international and local travel by providing
incentives for local tourism, while later admitting that the Government intentionally hid information related to the areas that are contacted with COVID‐19 amidst fear of public uproar.

This lack of transparency from the Indonesia’s Health Ministry and its Government is also documented in the Philippines. Both the Governments of Singapore and Myanmar have expressed the intention to impose their anti‐fake news provisions in their laws to control the information.

In Thailand, amidst public concern over the actual number of confirmed COVID‐19 cases, the authorities implied that presenting false information online related to COVID‐19 could fall under the offense of the Computer Crime Act.

More worryingly, no cases have yet to be reported from Laos and Myanmar, raising serious concerns about lack of testing or reporting, and consequent lack of pandemic preparedness.

As several countries including Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, Philippines, and Indonesia have tightened border controls and imposed forms of lock‐downs, FORUM-ASIA and many other NGOs are increasingly concerned that governments may use excessive force, militarisation, or other abuses of power in implementing these measures.

This becomes particularly concerning as uniformed forces are deployed without adequate training and due oversight when implementing these heightened control measures and the fact that most of ASEAN member states have authoritarian or partial‐democracy governments.

For example, in the Philippines on 15 March 2020, on the first day of the quarantine in Metro Manila, several individuals reported corruption and intimidation by the police. The expansion of quarantine to an ‘enhanced community quarantine’ level throughout Luzon, the largest and most populous island in the Philippines, also poses concern as access to transportation, food security, and essential healthcare facilities will be heavily restricted.

Meanwhile, the Government of Indonesia deployed its National Intelligence Agency to help monitor the situation, instead of relying on medical experts.

“Without an independent body to conduct monitoring and coordination of and among governmental bodies, potential violations and abuses of human rights including the right to access to healthcare, right to freedom of movement, right to personal security, right to privacy, and right to non‐penalisation for lack of documentation, is high,” said the NGOs in their statement.

“We are further concerned with the lack of preparedness and the inadequacy of healthcare systems and facilities in the region to address the COVID‐19 situation,” they added.

Despite governments’ insistence that their health protocols have met the World Health Organisation standards, sufficient access to testing and treatment as well as protection equipment are often only available in major hospitals in major cities in the region, without realistic solutions provided for the rest.

This situation threatens healthcare and social workers, who are at the frontline of the battle, as they are left vulnerable with a high risk of contamination due to the lack of protection protocols and safety equipment.

Additionally, the NGO also highlighted how the pandemic response further reinforces existing inequalities faced by vulnerable populations, particularly informal workers, migrant workers, as well as rural, elderly, indigenous, LGBTIQ, people with disabilities, and refugee communities. Refugees and other underground populations face unique vulnerabilities linked to risks posed by engaging authorities.

Mitigating these risks will be critical to stemming COVID‐19 spread. Meanwhile, women and girls are experiencing challenges as the burden to conduct unpaid care work for their family members, especially the sick, increases. Furthermore, incidents of domestic and intimate partner violence can likely increase during strict quarantines while services and facilities that aim at addressing domestic and gender‐based violence are disrupted due to COVID‐19 response procedure.

About 70% ASEAN’s workforce come from the informal sector, including part‐time informal workers, and workers in the ‘gig’ economy. Many are daily wage earners and/or coming from marginalised communities. These workers will have their livelihood severely affected from pandemic response measures.

Hence, states must provide a social protection net that mitigates the impact on all of those affected by the COVID‐19 pandemic without exception and without discrimination.

“They should also implement measures such as the universal work from home and covered‐leave policy, as well as contingency and compensation during the quarantine”, remarked the NGOs, while criticising businesses that still demand staff to report physically to work despite known risks or by imposing unpaid leave for several months.

Ultimately, the NGOs, in their statement, reiterated the importance of human rights and dignity as core principles in combating this global pandemic.

They noted with disappointment that these principles are not underscored in the commitment of ASEAN health sectors to further review and assess the enhanced cooperation in regional preparedness, response strategies, and countermeasures by utilising the ASEAN Plus Three Health Cooperation.

It is further disappointing to see that the disparate display of measures by the individual ASEAN Member States showed the lack of a coherent and coordinated ASEAN approach in managing the impact of the pandemic to the region.

Therefore, the NGOs call upon ASEAN Member States to practise the following measures:

  • Respect human rights, fundamental freedoms, and human dignity as well as to abide with international human rights standards and principles when implementing measures to address the COVID‐19 pandemic
  • Provide free and high quality tests, treatment, and care to all people affected by the pandemic, including marginalized groups and undocumented populations
  • Provide temporary and safe shelter during enforced quarantines for the homeless and other vulnerable communities
  • Facilitate regular and transparent access to accurate, timely, and comprehensive information to the public regarding the disease, including the risk of transmission, prevention, and governmental efforts to address the situation
  • Ensure that all employers, including public institutions and private companies and businesses, provide adequate compensation to all employees affected by the pandemic
  • Generate a timely response accessible to all people, including those who have limited access to healthcare facilities
  • Provide holistic measures, through law, policy, and practice, to uphold and ensure workers’ and migrant workers’ rights, welfare, safety, and security, regardless of legal status, in response to the COVID‐19 threat
  • Encourage all national human rights institutions to monitor the human rights impact their State’s measures together with civil society
  • Ensure that full access to social and protection mechanisms, including access to justice for women and girls must not cease at this time of quarantines.
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

国会分享“阿公的故事” 草根炮轰李美花“自卖自夸”

义顺集选区议员李美花于2月27日在国会发表伟论,分享“阿公和阿胜”的故事,意指人民有一个很好的“阿公”,谨慎处理财务,且“省吃俭用”每隔三五年给“阿胜”钱,来结婚、做生意等等。 相信李美花本来是要提醒人民,“这么好的阿公哪里找”,不料却引来草根群众的激烈反弹。有者认为,故事中的阿公骂阿胜是“死小孩”,难道是在骂人民?不懂感恩?再者李美花“报喜不报忧”,草根群众生活中面对生活开销压力,她又避而不谈;透过消费税、过路费等等,还有履行国民义务参与国民服役等,“阿胜”其实也为这个家承担了很多,难道阿胜真得没有担当、“不懂感恩”? 李美花于27日参与预算案结论时,用华语穿插福建话,和议员们分享:她有邻居“阿公和孙子阿胜”,阿公很疼他的孙子阿胜,省吃俭用来抚养这个孙子。阿公每隔几年就会给阿胜一笔钱,当阿胜要参与比赛、读大学,甚至结婚、做生意,阿公都有拿出一笔钱给他。但是阿胜过后问阿公怎么不每年给他钱时,阿公就破口大骂阿胜“死孩子、败家子”,不懂感恩,“其他阿公是否有这么做”。 李美花补充说,人民清楚我们有一个很好的政府,很谨慎处理了财务,才会有预算盈余、财政盈余,才会有很多利民配套。 以下是李美花在国会发表《阿公和阿胜》故事的视频: 最近在WhatApps社交软件传出了两则音频,对这个“阿公和阿胜”的故事表达心声。 一则音频是由不具名的草根民众所发出,以福建话对有关的故事进行批评和回馈,指责李美花只是单方面说辞,并没有聆听草根的发言。 他表示,虽然李美花是领着政府的薪金,但是故事不能只是阐述单方面的付出,而没有把现实说出来,即隐瞒了消费税调涨、水电费等生活费通货膨胀的事实。 揶揄李美花护主“老王卖瓜,自卖自夸” 这则音频内容为:“吃政府的饭碗,就讲政府的话。给人民300块就讲到“玲玲笼笼”(天花乱坠)。平时GST抽的税要调涨他又不讲。每天的水电费,吃的,手费等通货膨胀他又不讲。给人一点钱就像敲锣打鼓大势宣传,现在每个人每年都不够钱啊。听这个议员讲只是单方面啊。不能听单方面太多啊, 要你要听就听双方面,另外一面又不说,不要老王卖瓜,自卖自夸。” 另外一则音频则疑似一名乘客,录下了某德士司机的心声,指责李美花的言论简直就是在骂人民是“死小孩,死鬼仔“,不懂感恩。…

Ng Eng Hen: Maritime security task to restructure and enhance assets to combat sea piracy

On Monday, 3 Feb, Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen announced that there…

Being myself..

  By Marilyn Lai Monday, 4 December, 2006 I need to write…

Thailand and Taiwan cut down exports of face masks to overseas; Singapore not issuing any ban on the exports of face masks yet

Thailand’s government has imposed a ban on exports of face masks to…