Filipino domestic helpers / photo: flickr.com

The stringent measure put in place by the government to contain the spread of the Covid-19 outbreak could put migrant workers at risk of facing harsh punishments for breaching government orders that they may not be fully aware of, said the Humanitarian Organisation for Migration Economics (HOME) on Saturday (22 February).

In a statement on its website, the non-government organisation for migrant workers welfare and rights, said that it is important to consider the imbalance of power between employers and low wage migrant workers on work permit, pointing out that many of these workers rely on their employers to provide them with timely and accurate information on government advisories and laws.

“Indeed, it is the responsibility of employers to keep them informed,” stressed the organisation, adding that it is difficult for the workers themselves to stay updated when most of these announcements are made in languages that migrants workers may not understand.

HOME shared that most migrant workers may not have access to media outlets and if their employers expect them to be at work, they may feel obliged to comply for fear of losing their jobs. Additionally, if a worker has recruitment fee debts to pay off, the pressure intensifies.

The organisation called for these circumstances to be taken into consideration should any penalties be meted out to migrant workers for breaching government measures.

Beyond that, HOME also called for the Ministry of Manpower (MOM) to make efforts in informing migrant workers of their rights under the Employment of Foreign Manpower Act which stipulates that they should be paid their basic wages even if their employer has no work for them.

HOME brought this up in reference to the Stay-at-Home Notices and Leave of Absence that the government has implemented to prevent a wider spread of the virus.

The organisation acknowledged the efficacy of such measures but are also concerned about migrant domestic workers who have been denied rest days are forbidden from leaving their employers homes for fear of them contracting the virus.

HOME noted in its statement that it has been approached by migrant domestic workers who have been prevented from leaving their employer’s home since the outbreak arrived in Singapore.

The organisation explained, “They were unsure if they will be paid by their employers for not taking their rest days and were worried because they have been prevented from running important personal errands, such as remitting salaries to their families.”

“While we acknowledge the fears and concerns of families, especially those with young and vulnerable members, we urge employers to be flexible and understanding in managing their MDWs’ rest day arrangements and to address their worries,” it said.

HOME also reiterated calls by the MOM, Foreign Domestic Worker Association for Social Support and Training (FAST), and the Centre for Domestic Employee (CDE) that migrant domestic workers should not have to work if they are forbidden from leaving their employers homes on their rest days.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Singapore performs poorly in two separate global polls on workplace diversity and inclusion

Singapore is among the worse countries in the world in terms of…

1379元是否够用? 人力部辩称:依据实际开销计算公积金入息

两个月前,李光耀李光耀公共政策学院(LKYSPP)研究小组,发表《新加坡年长者需要:家庭预算报告》,评估认为65岁以上的单身国民,每月至少需要1379元才能满足其基本需求。 对于上述研究,人力部并未表态,是否赞同1379元才足够开销;而根据7月8日,刊登于《海峡时报》的报导,人力部似乎为自己辩护,指公积金终身入息计划(CPF LIFE)下的支付金额,乃是采用不同的方式计算。 研究小组报告认为,65岁以上单身年长者,每月需1379元才能满足家庭预算中的基本需求、65岁及以上的年长夫妇则需2351元、55岁至65岁的人士每月则需要1721元。而这还是假定他们健康良好的情况下。 小组报告收集约100名不同背景参与者的意见,且采用基于共识的最低薪资制(MIS),参与者列举出他们认为属于基本需求的物品和服务,也基于集体共识把这些必须品纳入清单内。 清单中包括了个人护理用品、休闲和文化活动等,而参与者一致认为达成基本需求比勉强过活重要。随后家庭预算也就依据这从清单中整合统计出来。 黄国和助理教授指出,这种收入标准,可协助把人们的社会价值观和实际经验,转化为较为明确和实质性基准,供政策规划。 人力部:会员应根据收入规划退休 不过,对于上述研究成果和对未来政策改革提供参照的努力,人力部似乎不太买账,反之辩称,公积金局自有一套方式,来计算65以上国人的公积金入息支付金额。 我国人力部收入保障政策司退休事务部主任Shaun Goh,评论有关研究“对个人目标设定和退休计划有用”,然而她指出,研究所使用的方法,与政府根据公积金终身入息计划所得出的支付金额,有根本上的不同。 她也没有表态,人力部是否同意有关的1379元为年长者要求的基准金额建议。…

Defence Cyber Chief: Whitehat hackers invited to hack MINDEF

The Ministry of Defence (MINDEF)’s Defence Cyber Chief, Mr David Koh, has…

李玮玲揭总检察署向律师公会投诉林学芬

总理李显龙妹妹李玮玲医生于昨晚10时42分,在个人脸书揭露总检察署针对李显扬妻子林学芬,为建国总理李光耀准备遗嘱一事,向新加坡律师公会提呈逾500页的投诉信。 总理弟弟李显扬也分享了该贴文。李玮玲认为有关投诉重提过去李显龙透过个人律师的指控,总理认为林学芬在参与草拟遗嘱上身份有利益冲突,因为她是李显扬的妻子,而他的丈夫却会是遗嘱分配的受益人。 虽然总理前律师黄鲁胜已回避此事,然而现任的副检察长仍是前人民行动党议员Hri Kumar。 李玮玲认为,这是史无前例地在涉及私人遗嘱事项上,动用司法程序。 “李显龙对父亲的遗嘱,以及父亲要拆除欧思礼路38号故居的意愿感到不满。父亲在五年前完成遗嘱和附录时,就已经告知所有子女和律师。在2015年,在李显龙的敦促下完成遗嘱认证。” 当时,包括李显龙等各造,都接受有关遗嘱乃是父亲的真实意愿。但是李显龙仍透过其部长成立的委员会,在2016和2017年攻击有关已受承认的遗嘱。 在初期,有关委员会也从未向李玮玲和李显扬透露有关委会成员名单。直到2017年总理夫妇被指涉滥权后,才公布名单。 李玮玲在帖文中写道:“李光耀作为备受尊崇的律师,从未对其遗嘱有任何非议。没有任何受益人向律师公会投诉,包括向律师黄鲁胜咨询意见的李总理。为何直到现在,由总检察署攻击父亲的遗嘱。我们的看法是整件行动没有任何价值。” 李玮玲也提到过去一年半总检察署也对李绳武的私人脸书贴文事件紧咬不放,那些分享贴文的人士也没被针对。 总检察署:林学芬有失职表面证据 另一方面,总检察署在答复媒体询问时指出,李显扬妻子林学芬作为专业律师,在位李光耀准备遗嘱一事,有失职之嫌的表面证据,表面触犯法律专业(专业行为规章)第25节条文和第46节条文。…