Source: Choa Chu Kang MRT

The MRT trips between Choa Chu Kang MRT and Jurong East MRT stations were extended to 20 minutes this morning (13 February) due to a track fault along the North-South line.

At 9.24 am, SMRT Corporation announced on Twitter about the delay and said the operator will provide free regular buses between both stations.

Not long after, SMRT Corporation posted another tweet to announce that the track fault had been cleared and the train service has resumed. The free regular buses ended and it also apologized for the delay.

However, a commuter responded to the tweet and said he did not notice any free bus being provided at Bukit Gombak station and ended up using the MRT instead.

Another commuter commented that there was no staff to guide the commuters and the full fare was deducted for traveling from Bukit Gombak to Jurong East station. 

Some commuters also voiced out their frustration on Twitter about the instructions given by SMRT and questioned the availability of the free buses.

Another disrupted MRT trip that was caused by a track fault happened on 19 July 2019, when the train service on the North East line experienced a delay for about two hours due to a track fault at HarbourFront MRT station, The Straits Times reported.

On 31 May 2019, the North-South line also experienced a short delay at around 8 am in the morning due to a track fault at Ang Mo Kio which had caused the delays in the Southbound service towards Marina South Pier.   

However, on 2 January, Transport Minister Khaw Boon Wan indicated 2019 as a “very good year” for the MRT and “2020 will be better”. 

The Minister announced the renewal programme for the North-South and East-West MRT lines will cost more than S$2.5 billion which includes a replacement of the power supply system, track circuits, and first-generation trains. 

According to the Minister, the first phase of the renewal involved replacing the rail sleepers, third rail and signalling systems of the two lines which are more than 30 years old, having been opened in 1987.

He also announced that the second phase of the programme was already underway. The renewal programme started in 2013 and is expected to be completed by 2024. 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

The barren political landscape

~by: Dr Wong Wee Nam~ The ominous forecast is if we don’t…

动漫展疑未申请表演准证 连累三本国女子在马被捕

动漫展疑未申请表演准证,八名角色扮演者的外籍女子,包括三名新加坡女子,和四名参展男子被马来西亚移民局逮捕。 马国吉隆坡移民局主任哈米迪阿当表示,该局官员于24日在吉隆坡布特拉路展开联合取缔行动,并在一间酒店举行的动漫展中,共检查了52名人士。 未获得PUSPAL准证 他说,该动漫展《Cosplay Festival 4》的主办人,因为没有为嘉宾申请海外艺人表演与电影播放中心委员会(PUSPAL)所发出的表演准证,却在活动上收买周边产品和表演,所以被取缔了。 他指出,该漫画展原定举办两天,于25日结束,但是因为取缔行动,被迫于当天叫停。活动中被逮捕的人士分别来自日本(5人)、新加坡(3人)、泰国(2人)以及香港(1人)。当局也逮捕了一名疑是主办人的马国男子助查。 哈米迪阿当在脸书贴文指出,被逮捕的外国人士数天前使用社交签证入境,有一些人还被发现滥用工作准证。而他表示,此次逮捕行动,当局将援引1959/1963年移民厅法令第56(1)(D)条文(非法收留外劳)和1959/1963年移民厅法令第39(B)条文展开调查。 海外艺人表演与电影播放中心委员会,是在2001年通过马国内阁成立,并被纳入马通讯与多媒体部的委员会,主要是让所有海外艺人来马国从事任何与金钱有关的活动时,都必须获得相关部门准证,以达到审核的效果。 未获得准证而表演或售卖产品的海外艺人,就属触犯了1959/1963年移民厅法令第39(B)条文。一旦被定罪,他们将在被遣送回国前,面对不超过1000令吉的罚款,或6个月监刑,或两者兼施。主办人则会因为触犯了1959/1963年移民厅法令第56(1)(D)条文,面对不低于1万令吉、不超过5万令吉的罚款。

8 SMRT staff connected to pump maintenance which led to flooding, dismissed as internal investigation and disciplinary inquiry concludes

In a press release dated 27 Nov, SMRT announces that its internal investigation…

名列官网选民名单,系统却显示“未注册” 妇女险错失投票机会

一名本地妇女指出,她于上周五(7月10日)进行投票时,投票站扫描系统显示她“未注册”,导致她差点无法履行公民权力。惟,经过几番奔走,所幸最后还是得以成功投票,然而妇女也对选举局的敷衍态度感失望。 公民珊德丽(Chandri)指出,她上周和丈夫在马西岭油池集选区的一个投票站,她的丈夫并没有面对任何登记问题,但是轮到她时,投票站的系统上却显示“未注册”(unregistered)为选民,导致她无法投票。 就住在蔡厝港的珊德丽指出,她在新加坡出生,且有很长一段时间没有出国了,更曾经在2015年大选投票,因此不了解为什么会出现这种情况。 珊德丽上选举局的官网检查时,她的名字确实在选民名单内。更何况她还领到2020大选的投票卡。 奇怪的是,投票站工作人员当时曾帮她手动核对身份证,却没有在选民名单内找到她的名字。 珊德丽之后到邻近的警局报案,并依据建议拨电联络选举局。选举局官员指出,他们对此无能为力,并要求她电邮到选举局,避免类似情况在来届大选重演。 无计可施之下,她于当天下午1时15分电邮至选举局,之后被告知她的案件“待审定”。当媒体询问她后续情况时,珊德丽表示曾有一名男子,杰里先生(Mr.Jerry)拨电联络她,告诉她当天就可以投票了。 但是,她并没有受到选举局的回应,也没有解释事发原因。 珊德丽当天并没有放弃投票权,她在投票站和警察局来回奔走,但是就算选举局网站上有她的选民注册证明,她依然不被允许投票。 她对于选举权几乎被剥夺,而选举局“只能避免下届大选重演”的态度感到不忿,认为当局似乎没有认真看待此重要事项。 庆幸的是,在经过六个小时后,一名官员于当天下午5时抵达她家门,并让她能够无需排队直接投票。 她表示,此次的投票经验令她感到忐忑和不安。试问,若有人面对类似问题却选择保持安静,没有像珊德丽一样努力争取自己的权益,类似的问题没有被提出来,那么他们的投票权是否就这样被剥夺了?…