Photo source: sgtrains.com

In a press release dated 27 Nov, SMRT announces that its internal investigation and disciplinary inquiry (DI) into the staff responsible for the pump maintenance at the Bishan-Braddell tunnel have been concluded.

Based on the DI’s findings and recommendations, 13 staff have been found responsible.

Of these, eight staff have been dismissed in accordance with SMRT’s disciplinary framework. The dismissed staff comprise of the staff in the work team who had falsified pump maintenance records, and the Managers and Senior Executive who were in charge of ensuring that pump maintenance was duly carried out during the period. They are made up of one Senior Executive, two Managers and five Technical Staff.

Investigations by SMRT have also found that Vice President Tay Tien Seng and Senior Manager Ivan Kok had failed to exercise sufficient supervision during the period when the falsification of the pump maintenance records occurred. As they are no longer with the company, SMRT states that it reserves its right to pursue legal action against them as may be appropriate.

Three other Management Executives, including a Vice President, have also been disciplined according to SMRT’s internal disciplinary framework for failing to exercise the due care and diligence expected of them in relation to the maintenance of the pumps.

On 7 October (Saturday), train services on the North-South line were affected by flooding in the tunnel from Bishan to Braddell MRT stations. SMRT had to cut off trackside power supply as a safety precaution, causing service on six stops across the NSL to be disabled for about 20 hours. More than a quarter of a million commuters were affected in the country’s first disruption due to flooding and making it one of SMRT’s worst breakdowns in recent history.

It was subsequently revealed that the sump pump which was supposed to pump rainwater out had malfunctioned. It was also noted that the maintenance had not been performed for the pumps and that the records had been falsified. Following the revelation, SMRT moved in to transfer its Vice President of Maintenance with another appointee.

SMRT states that it has strengthened its maintenance processes and supervisory checks in light of the incident and have made critical personnel changes to the management and maintenance team.  It notes that it has set up a Joint Readiness Inspection team to ensure that maintenance and asset replacement are independently audited and monitored in a systematic way. Third-party Qualified Persons and Subject Matter Experts are being engaged to enhance quality control surveillance of all maintenance activities and conduct a system-wide review of critical systems. Leadership training for mid-level supervisors and managers is also being stepped up.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

高庭驳回迪哥达索取警方录供的刑事动议

本月3日,大法官梅达顺在高庭驳回了本社总编许渊臣,以及被控刑事诽谤男子迪哥达的刑事动议。 检控官拒绝公开两人此案中的警方录供,他们个别针对此事提呈刑事动议。 不过,梅达顺在口头陈述判决依据时表明,提呈在他眼前的凭据,未能说服他要求高庭审核国家法院裁决的最高门槛已达到。 早前,迪哥达辩护律师拉维,依循刑事诉讼法(CPC)第22条文,要求控方在开审前出示迪哥达的口供,但遭国家法院法官驳回。 至于许渊臣辩护律师朱正熙,强调许渊臣此前录的口供,能力助此案,因为当时当局并没有盘问被告,确认他是否有诽谤内阁的意图,以及他是否认为文章陈述是中立或不利的。 梅达顺则认为,辩方大可在上诉时提及此事,惟朱正熙也指出有凸显程序错误的重要;梅达顺也提醒检控官,考量有关口供是否和辩方有关联。 拉维律师则提及,早在开审前,检控官就已知道被告索取有关口供,但当时对方就已拒绝。可是控方仍辩解被告可走刑事案件披露会议(Criminal Case Disclosure Conference,简称CCDC)程序,但依据《刑事诉讼法》第159条文,却需要征得控辩双方同意。 一开始控方就拒绝让被告索取口供,对此拉维更形容控方的上述建议,形同让被告做“徒劳之举”(原文:go on…

【冠状病毒19】8月9日新增175确诊 三入境病例

根据卫生部文告,截至本月9日中午12时,本地新增175例冠病19确诊,一例是社区病例,入境病例三例。 本地累计确诊已增至5万5104例。 新增病例大多是隔离中、以及正接受检测的客工。新增社区病例为本地公民。三例入境病例,在抵境后已遵守居家通知。