Home Affairs Senior Parliamentary Secretary, Sun Xueling, affirmed that Management Corporation Strata Titles (MCST) were responsible to ensure that all fire safety measures, including fire hose reels in condominiums are fully functional to handle emergencies, noting that this is stated under the Fire Safety Act 1993.

Ms Sun was responding to Ms Cheryl Chan Wei Ling, MP for Fengshan, during the parliamentary question time on Monday (3 Feb).

Miss Chan has posed two questions regarding fire safety measures. She raised issues with the functionality of fire hose points in condominiums as well as the inspection and testing done by third parties and the liabilities of MCST in the event of non-functionality of emergency systems.

Ms Sun said MCST is required to appoint professional engineers to audit the fire safety measures as part of the annual renewal of the building’s fire certificate.

This is a crucial step as condominiums pose fire safety risks, especially those with more than 24 meters of habitable height. Such condominiums need to install fire protection systems that conform to requirements as set out in the act.

Though audits are done by professionals, the MCST are still held accountable for and safety feature which is found to be non-functional.

The Minister elaborated further that the Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF) will also conduct safety inspection in response to feedback that is received.

Last year, during a fire at the Block 120A Bukit Batok Street 21, SCDF fire fighters were unable to use the hose reels. The hose reel boxes were padlocked and there was no water supply to the hose reel when the fire fighters managed to access it.

The Jurong-Clementi Town Council’s investigations revealed that the contractors were negligent in ensuring that a selector switch in the pump room was in the correct mode.

But the contracted company had however signed false statements to show that the hose reels were in working condition.

However, on the same issue in a supplementary question, Ms Chan asserted that the MCST are staffed by volunteers and they do not have professional expertise to know whether inspections are carried out thoroughly and accurately.

Answering on behalf of the Ministry, Ms Sun concluded that the SCDF will issue a Fire Hazard Abatement Notice to MCST if they are found to be in violation of fire safety measures. It is only an offence when MCST does not rectify faults outlined in the Fire Hazard Abatement Notice, she added.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

MUIS: Hari Raya Aidilfitri communal prayer calls, special sermon will not be televised; IMDA prohibits religious content on free-to-air channels

The communal prayer calls and a special sermon — known as takbir…

仅隔四日政府再祭出“泼马” 要求时事网站更正内容

本周一(25日),新加坡前进党党员毕博渊(Brad Bowyer),成为首位被政府援引《防止网络假信息和防止网络操纵法案》(POFMA),要求更正网络贴文的人士。 不过仅仅过了四日,今日(28日)轮到内政部祭出防假消息法,要求来自澳洲的脸书专页State Times Review(STR),发出要求更正指示,指后者的文章存有不实讯息。 根据内政部的声明,有关文章是在本月23日刊登,内容指“新加坡国立大学学生联合会”(NUSSU)脸书粉丝专页的管理人,已经被警方逮捕,以及对我国选举制度作出不实指控。 不过内政部则驳斥,无人遭到逮捕,政府也没要求脸书产出有关账户。 根据本社早前报导,脸书公司发言人于周日(11月24日)指出,该假冒账户(NUSSU – NUS Students United)违反了真实身份守则,因此将其删除。…

前头检举后头吞云吐雾 环境局外包官员遭辞退

我国禁止电子烟,但是国家环境局官员前头检举他人,后头就自己抽起电子烟“快乐似神仙”,知法犯法的外包执法员随后遭开除。 一名网友于日前在脸书上发帖,指看见前头还在美芝路黄金坊内检举违法电子眼的环境局官员,事后却在黄金坊外抽电子烟。 “我们不能抽电子烟,他们就可以吗?!眼中没有政府?!无法无天。” 此帖文一出,吸引了网民纷纷回应,同时也吸引了政府当局的关注。 有者认为放工了属私人时间,可以做自己喜欢的事件,但是更多网友认为环境局应该采取对付行动,并“监督好”自己的员工。 “我们的政府机构越来越狂妄了,陆路交通管理局无法妥善处理个人代步工具事件,现在环境局有这种基层官员知法犯法。想知道还有哪些机构同样糟糕?” 环境局在获知有关消息后就展开调查,经过确认后就通知外包公司,将有关人员辞去。 当局在回复《亚洲新闻台》询问时指出,已经将有关人士交由卫生科学局对付了。

Minority PM: Time for the leadership to take the lead

“A Prime Minister must be assessed by his ability, regardless of his race,” says Mohd Haireez.