We apologise for the delay in publishing Mr PN Balji’s piece, as earlier indicated on TOC. It will be published at a later date. We apologise for any inconvenience caused.

Mohd Haireez / Guest Writer

In response to a question on whether Singapore is ready for a minority-race prime minister, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong suggested that while it is not impossible, it is unlikely to happen in the foreseeable future.

In support of his proposition, Mr Lee revealed at a dialogue session organized by MESRA, that it was dependent on how people voted and suggested that the race of the candidate is an unavoidable influence in the voting pattern.

With all due respect to Mr Lee, his response is at best, unsettling, particularly after decades of struggle to portray the government as a racially-unbiased institution.

Mr Lee pointed out that race is a factor in the appointment of a Prime Minister.

This is especially disturbing considering that the position of Prime Minister is not constitutionally dependent on the votes of the average citizen but is contingent upon the decision of the President who is supposed to select a Member of Parliament “who in his judgment is likely to command the confidence of the majority of the Members of Parliament..”, according to Article 25 of our Constitution.

In practice, while the People’s Action Party (PAP) continues to dominate Parliament, the person the party endorses as Prime Minister will be elevated to that position, and confirmed by the President. Hence, Mr Lee’s statement is especially important.

To suggest that race is an unavoidable issue in this appointment is to suggest that race is still a factor in deciding whether a candidate can command the confidence of our elected Parliamentarians. This leads to the inexcusable inference that our very own leaders are still somewhat racially-prejudiced.

I am not insinuating that our leaders should be free from the prejudices that plague the common man but as people whom the average person vests responsibility in, it is imperative that the government, at least the Prime Minister, should represent a figure who transcends racial lines.

I am also not suggesting that Singapore has reached a stage whereby citizens are Singaporeans first, before their own respective races, in all circumstances.

But if we accept that the way forward is embodied in our pledge “regardless of race, language or religion” as our Government has, then surely it has to start with our leaders.

In extension of his response, Mr Lee rationalised that the fact Senator John McCain garnered a majority of white votes in the recent US Presidential elections is a reflection of how race is still a factor in the minds of the American voters.

But this overlooks the fact that not a single Democrat has won a majority of the white vote since Lyndon Johnson in 1964 despite fielding white candidates as Presidential-hopefuls. In fact, Senator John Kerry, a white Democrat nominee, attracted less support from the white voters in 2004 than President-elect Obama did in the recent US Presidential election. Senator Kerry garnered just 43 percent of the white vote while still attracting the majority of the non-white voters despite being white himself.

These statistics make it at least clear that race, while etched in the minds of some, is only one of several concerns for the majority of the Americans.

The American people have shown that they are willing to start judging a candidate by his abilities, and not his race.

Similarly, a suitable Prime Minister must be assessed by his ability, regardless of his race.

Even if this remains an ideal, there is no reason why our leaders, especially Mr Lee, cannot endorse this ideal especially when it comes to selecting the Prime Minister of our multi-racial country.

———-

About the author:

Mohd Haireez is currently a year 3 undergraduate at the NUS Faculty of Law. He believes that community-involvement is the most effective means of familiarising oneself with grassroot issues. Besides being a regular at Downtown east and Arab Street, the former Vice-President of the NUS Malay Language Society is himself an avid volunteer. He is currently the Chairman of the Youth Committee in Al-Istighfar Mosque and is working with NGOs like YAMP on several projects.

———-

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Flat ownership transfers only allowed in certain cases: HDB

The Housing and Development Board (HDB) has implemented new restrictions for the…

Indonesia beefs up security following Makassar cathedral explosion and National Police headquarters attack

JAKARTA, INDONESIA — Indonesia is intensifying security in places of worship and…

逐步停用外包服务 Sparkletots寻找内部厨师

自从Sparkletots幼儿园集体食物中毒事件后,90巴仙的学生已返回校园,人民行动党社区基金(PCF)目前正在为其幼儿园寻找新的主厨,并且逐步停用外包供应商。 人民行动党社区基金会执行理事长马瑞发称,该基金会愿检讨所开出的厨师薪酬和福利待遇。已经完成获国家环境局(NEA)认证的基本食物卫生课程的多名行政人员,也将被部署到厨房去帮忙。 自星期一(4月1日)开始,16家幼儿园中的15家,主要是盛港和榜鹅区的幼儿园已经改用内部聘用的厨师。 当局星期五也表示,将探讨在榜鹅北部的最后一家拥有超过400名学生的幼儿园,为聘用厨师而设立更大的厨房设施。 另外三家使用不同外包供应商的幼儿园,将会转而聘用内部厨师。 没有出现新病例 首宗食物中毒事件发生在3月21日,共有来自13家该基金会旗下Sparkletots 幼儿园的239名儿童和12名教职员出现食物中毒的症状,其中的31人送院就医。239宗病例中,有40宗被证实是食物中毒。 目前所有的儿童已经出院,并且有90巴仙已经返回学校上课。 自星期二开始,就再也没有出现新病例。 有关的食物由外包供应商Kate’s Catering准备,该供应商目前已经被吊销执照了。…

【冠状病毒19】病患曾到访女皇道购物中心健身房多次

卫生部指出,有冠状病毒19确诊病患曾到访樟宜机场第三搭客大厦的快餐店,更有确诊病患曾多次到访女皇道购物中心的健身房。 卫生部昨日(9月14日)发布文告,列出确诊病患曾到访过得新增地点和时段,并表示已向曾与确诊病患有亲密接触者发出通知。当局也促请曾于同一时段,和确诊病患到访同一地点的民众留意自身健康,若出现急性呼吸道感染症状、或发烧、味觉或嗅觉失灵,应尽快就医,并向医生坦承曾经到过的地点。 确诊病患曾到访的新增地点和时段如下: 9月1日晚上7时35分至9时:列大厦(Liat Tower)的Shake Shack汉堡店 9月3日晚上8时30分至9时30分、9月4日晚上8时40分至9时30分、9月6日晚上8时20分至9时30分、9月8日晚上8时25分至9时30分:女皇道购物中心(Queensway Shopping Centre)的Anytime Fitness健身房 9月6日晚上8时至8时55分:榜鹅水滨坊的Han’s咖啡屋 9月8日下午3时至4时15分:威城(West…