Entrance of State court (Photo – Terry Xu)

The iconic State Courts Building at 1 Havelock Square closed its doors on Friday (13 Dec) after 44 memorable years of operations since it was built in 1975.
The State Courts held a ceremony at the State Courts Atrium – a favourite meeting point for lawyers, court users and staff and a place that has witnessed numerous events in the State Courts, including the renaming of the State Courts from “Subordinate Courts” in 2014.
Besides the judges and staff of the State Courts, representatives of their stakeholder agencies such as the Attorney-General’s Chambers, Singapore Police Force, Singapore Prison Service, Ministry of Social and Family Development, Community Justice Centre, and the Bar were also present to bid farewell to this courthouse that has partnered them in delivering justice to the people of Singapore for over four decades.
Presiding Judge of the State Courts, Justice See Kee Oon said, “The then Subordinate Courts commenced operations on 15 September 1975 in this building, consolidating the various courts that were formerly scattered throughout various locations. The eight-sided building’s uniquely modern and commanding presence stood in sharp contrast with the neighbouring buildings in Chinatown. This was clearly a modern courthouse of its time and the building has certainly served us well over the last 44 years.”
The judges and staff of the State Courts celebrated the beginning of a new chapter of their judicial journey with a march, led by Justice See Kee Oon, Presiding Judge of the State Courts, to the adjacent State Courts Towers, where they will continue with their mission to serve society with quality judgments, timely dispute resolution and excellent court services.

Image from State Courts’ Facebook page
Image from State Courts’ Facebook page
The march was said to be a demonstration of the State Courts’ commitment to be a forward-looking judiciary that is ready to overcome any challenges to deliver access to justice.
A pair of murals, comprising a collage of photos of the judges and staff, was unveiled by Justice See and Ms Jennifer Marie, Deputy Presiding Judge of the State Courts, at the lobby of the State Courts Towers. These two murals are said to be a symbol of the commitment by judges and staff of the State Courts on their mission to serve the society.
Operations in the State Courts Towers commenced in phases from 9 December 2019 and will be fully operational from 16 December 2019.

Situated in the State Courts Towers is the State Courts Heritage Gallery, which has preserved the history of the State Courts Building and the organisation. Members of the public can visit the Gallery from 16 December 2019 to learn more about the State Courts, including some of the interesting cases they have heard in the State Courts Building in the last four decades.
The State Courts Building, which received conservation status on 10 July 2013, will be retrofitted to house the Family Justice Courts.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Prof Tommy Koh: What Singapore needs is not sycophants but loving critics and critical lovers

Professor Tommy Koh echoed a common adage that Singapore is a first…

I absolutely agree that Singapore politics is for Singaporeans to decide – Blacklisted human-rights activist

In early June this year, Taiwan-based journalist and human-rights activist Bo Tedards…

New HDB portal to be introduced to allow homeowners to advertise and list their own flats – what will happen to property agents?

Starting from Wednesday (11 September), first-time Housing and Development Board (HDB) flat…

前女佣被指偷窃终得平反 法官质疑廖文良一家指控存“不当意图”

46岁的印尼籍女佣巴蒂·莉雅妮(Parti Liyani),为樟宜机场集团主席廖文良工作近九年,不幸在2016年10月28日被裁退。 巴蒂被裁后,当天就返回印尼。不料雇主廖文良父子却在两日后报警,指控巴蒂偷走5万元财物,包括价值2.5万元名表、Prada的名牌包和Gucci墨镜等。 这也导致巴蒂在2016年12月返回新加坡时,在樟宜机场被逮捕。2019年3月,巴蒂被国家法院判罪名成立,并判坐牢两年两个月,前者选择上诉。 根据2018年8月的《新明日报》报导,当时廖文良在法庭供证时,甚至指出家里东西一再不见,家里当时只有他、妻子以及女佣,如果东西不是他和妻子偷的,女佣嫌疑最大。 廖文良声称不想继续冒险,所以妻子才辞退了巴蒂。廖自称除非出问题,否则自己不轻易开除员工,也指秘书和司机都已和他共事多年。 然而,今年9月4日,高庭推翻了国家法院的判决,改判巴蒂无罪。高庭法官陈成安甚至表示,有理由相信廖文良为了阻止女佣到人力部投诉,所以廖家父子先发制人,突然解雇女佣,不让后者有时间去人力部,并指控后者偷窃。 廖启龙自称有“穿女装习惯”? 至于廖文良儿子廖启龙,还被法官点名“不诚实的控方证人”,例如,廖启龙称失窃的女性衣物属于他的,而不是女佣的,甚至自称有穿女性衣物的习惯,说辞令人难以相信。 根据《联合早报》报导,所谓“赃物”移交警局过程也存在疑点,特别是廖家声称开箱检查女佣留下的三大箱子,并报警后,警方未立即取走证物。五周后女佣被捕,警方才上门再拍摄证物照片,廖家人才把失窃物品放回箱里。法官认为整个过程都出现混肴,甚至无法凭这些证物定罪巴蒂。 随着巴蒂上诉得直,使得包括总检察署、人力部和警方等各造,才表示将研讨是否采取进一步行动。 巴蒂申诉被非法调他处工作…