Entrance of State court (Photo – Terry Xu).

The 32-driver who recorded videos of Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s son Li Yipeng back in March when he was giving him a ride in his rental car has been fined S$900 on 14 November (Thursday).
The Singaporean, Andrew Sim Kay Yong, was also disqualified from driving all classes of vehicles for eight months.
Four videos, between 47 to 53 seconds, were taken without Mr Li’s knowledge or permission and went viral when it was uploaded online sometime in March.
Mr Sim, who was not a private-hire-driver at the time, pleaded guilty in court to one charge of taking a video while driving a Toyota Estima. The court heard that Mr Sim had offered Mr Li a ride home after recognising him while waiting at the Esplanade taxi stand on 15 March.
Though Mr Li initially refused, he eventually entered the car after having a conversation with Mr Sim. Mr Li asked to be taken to Rochalie Drive.
While driving, Mr Sim used his mobile phone, aiming it over his left shoulder, to record four video clips of Mr Li in the back seat while driving the car with only one hand. In the video, Mr Sim can be heard asking Mr Li various questions about whether his father is the Prime Minister of Singapore and whether the PM’s brother Lee Hsien Yang still visits the family.
As the journey progressed, Mr Li asked to be dropped off at 295 Tanglin Road instead. Mr Sim did so and didn’t take any money for the trip.
Just after the videos went viral, PM Lee’s press secretary Ms Chang Li Lin said that he was aware of the incident and the videos. She said, “It is of concern that a vulnerable person can be taken advantage of like this. Yipeng happens to be PM’s son, but many other vulnerable persons go about Singapore on their own, and they must be able to do so safely, without being taken advantage of or harassed and without their privacy being breached.”
Mr Li is PM Lee’s second child of four. He has Asperger’s syndrome.
The Deputy Public Prosecutor (DPP) Tay Jingxi sought for the maximum fine against Mr Sim, highlighting several compounded traffic offences by him between from 2006 to April last year including taking a vehicle without the owner’s consent, speeding, beating a traffic light, and failing to wear a seatbelt.
The maximum punishment here is a fine of up to S$1,000, jail for six months, or both.
Mr Sim’s lawyer, Joseph Tan, argued in mitigation that Mr Sim was merely being a ‘good samaritan’ in offering Mr Li a ride and had only intended to show the video to his close group of friends.
It was argued that the videos were uploaded online without Mr Sim’s knowledge.
“These were circulated among the group, then unknown to him, they were uploaded online and went viral. It is quite different from him taking the videos to post online,” said Mr Tan.
He also argued that Mr Sim did stop the car at certain points but District Judge Lorraine Ho said that the car was “quite clearly” moving in most parts of the video.
She added that Mr Sim knew what he was doing and had “deliberately, conscientiously and calculatingly” took the videos.
“He not only had to take concerted efforts to hide what he was doing, he had to be sure to place his mobile phone in such a manner to ensure that he would capture the full view of the victim from top to bottom while using his other hand to drive and control the steering wheel,” she said.
“He was so distracted… that he not only caused danger to himself and his passenger, but also to other road users.”
Judge Ho also ordered for Mr Sim’s phone to be destroyed.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Women’s armpits in China – a battleground for equality

“Girls are often anxious about their armpit hair as if it’s a…

Netizens chide authorities for taking actions to deal with speeding only after Tanjong Pagar fatal car crash

Following the tragic accident that saw five people killed in the early…

Migrant worker slit his throat in an alleged suicide attempt at dormitory

A migrant worker had allegedly slit his throat on Sunday morning (2…

全球经济放缓影响,调查指求职者更关注工作保障与稳定

员工在寻求新工作时,最大的考量就是生活平衡与其工资。但根据最新调查指出,如今工作保障逐渐成为首要考虑因素之一,在所有考量因素的比例,薪酬达16.6巴仙,而生活平衡达13.7巴仙,紧接着就是工作保障,达11.4巴仙。 全国最大求职网站JobStreet.com日前公布最新调查,根据结果显示,一度被认为求职关键因素,如未来前景、员工福利、公司管理以及组织文化,如今逐渐不被重视,反观工作的稳定与保障逐渐成为决定入职的关键因素。 比起兼职或合同工,求职者更倾向长期稳定的工作 据报告指出,这可能与全球经济放缓的因素有关,加上数码时代的来临与我国国发展趋向智慧国原因,求职者愈发关注就业竞争力,即使本国的失业率相对较低。 Jobstreet区域经理Chew Siew Mee表示,“由于目前全球经济地位仍旧不稳定,因此求职者在就业等重要问题上很自然地会选择寻求比较有保障及稳定的工作。” 调查显示,受访者更倾向长期稳定的工作,33巴仙的受访者表示若工作的属性是兼职或契约工,他们会选择拒绝。其中更以X时代(12.6巴仙)与婴儿潮一代(12巴仙)最忧虑。此外,44巴仙的受访者表示,他们更倾向于到财务状况较为稳定的公司求职。 同样地,工作保障的需求跨越所有年龄层与工作位阶,其中中阶层管理人员是最为担忧。另一方面,菜职场新鲜人最不在意工作保障,很可能因为他们才刚刚开始步入社会,正在累积经验有关。 求职者最在乎薪资与生活平衡 与此同时,五成以上的受访者认为每周工作五天,享有足够的带薪假期能达到生活平衡,因此对于轮班工作则是较为不受欢迎的选择。受访者亦表示,对于自己休假的权利能够有更多的控制权,宁可分散年假分配,也不愿意以工作赚取休假天数。生活平衡尤其在公司中担任高职的员工更为重要,31巴仙的人认为加班就应该得到补偿。 不出所料,求职者最在意的还是薪酬,调查显示,求职者在寻找新的工作时,会期望工资能够有所提升。其中以从事零售业和商品买卖工作的求职者最高(26.6巴仙);其次是餐饮业(26.1巴仙);再来是大众媒体(25.7巴仙),比起其他行业,他们对于加薪换工作是由更高的期待。…