Singapore – October 16, 2016: the Central Provident Fund is a compulsory comprehensive savings plan for working Singaporeans and permanent residents (Photo by macashop from Shutterstock).

A total of S$211 million has been left unclaimed with the Insolvency and Public Trustee’s Office (IPTO) over the last six years, largely made up of Central Provident Fund (CPF) money. The monies were left behind by people who died with no benefactor nominated.
The IPTO received S$63.2 million of unnominated CPF money last year alone, belonging to 3,450 individuals.
That’s a lot of money left unclaimed. The question is, why?
In January, we published a letter sent in by Zol who highlighted the issue he was having with adjusting his CPF payouts to match his needs.
The 65-year old, who is married with no children, said he received a letter from CPF informing him to either apply for a monthly retirement payout at 65 years old or delay it until he is 70 for a higher payout sum. Mr Zol was expecting this.
However, he was surprised to find out that CPF had calculated his monthly payouts to last 28 years.
Mr Zol wrote, “the one thing that shocked me was that I could only receive $482 monthly from June 2019 under the CPF Retirement Sum Scheme, and this payout would last about 28 years, when I would be 93 years old.”
He explained that he wrote to CPF to request for a 20-year payout instead which would mean a higher payout that will last until he is about 85. Mr Zol based this on the average life expectancy of Singaporean as reported in the media of 85.4 years.
Recent statistics from the Immigration and Checkpoints Authority’s (ICA) Registry of Births and Deaths support Mr Zol’s estimate, or rather it is even lower. In 2017, a report by the ICA showed the average age at death for Malays is 70.6 years while for Indians and other ethnic groups, it is 69.5 and 65.9 years respectively. The average age of the Chinese stands at 78.
This shows that, on average, ethnic minority Singaporeans do not live to the age of eligibility for automatic CPF monthly payouts, they won’t get to use their CPF monies in their lifetime.
Unfortunately, CPF merely rejected Mr Zol’s request, citing ‘current policies’ as the reason’.
“And we members were never consulted,” said Mr Zol, referring to the CPF policy.
“However, if you search the CPF website on “CPF-Your Assurance in Retirement”, this article states that “…. you can choose your desired amount of monthly payouts to meet your retirement needs…”
Indeed, the CPF website does say that a member can choose their desired amount of monthly payouts to meet their needs
Mr Zol lamented, “As I am married with no children, I need to support myself from now till death. If I cannot secure a job from now till 70 years old, what do I survive on during this 5-year period if I opt in at 70 years old?”
He went on to comment that the 4% CPF interest may not even cover inflation and the progressive increase in GST in Singapore.
“If using present value to evaluate the 2 options (ie. start the plan at 65 or 70 years old), the best decision is to withdraw all my CPF money now,” says Mr Zol.
He goes on to say, “In light of my situation (ie. married with no children), it is totally illogical to suggest a payout term of 28 years. When my wife and I pass on, there is no one to receive my balance payout.”
Anticipating the rebuttal that the government is merely looking out for its citizens and want to ensure that they have a steady income in their old age, Mr Zol argues that even if he does use up his CPF retirement sum by the time he is 85, he can sell his 5-room flat to support himself without external financial help.
Mr Zol’s predicament is understandable and the points he raised are worth noting. Since CPF is essentially the hard-earned savings of each individual, shouldn’t they be able to decide on their own payout amounts and period?
As given that Mr Zol has no children, as he says, who would he nominate to receive his CPF savings should he pass on before he uses it all up? Would it then end up in as part of the unclaimed sum under the Public Trustee’s Office (PTO)?

What happens to unclaimed CPF monies?

Now, by default, CPF monies of a deceased person will go to anyone they have nominated as a beneficiary. However, if no one has been nominated, the monies will be transferred to the PTA for distribution to their family members under the Intestate Succession Act or the Inheritance Certificate (for Muslims).
According to Section 7 of the Act, the spouse and children get top priority for inheriting the money followed by parents, siblings, grandparents, and finally aunties and uncles.
Lawyers whom The Straits Times spoke to said that the amount of unclaimed CPF monies is likely to rise as the population ages and family sizes shrink.
“I do foresee this sum growing, particularly given the rise in the number of elderly folk living alone. More Singaporeans may choose to remain unmarried and so more people may not see the need to make a nomination or simply do not have the time to do it,” said Ms Norhakim Shah, a senior associate at I.R.B. Law.
Associate director of PKWA Law, Ms Charlene Nah, told ST that small family units which have experienced successive deaths in a short period of time could also account for the increase in unclaimed CPF monies as beneficiaries die before they can claim the CPF monies.
The question of what PTO does with the unclaimed monies was raised in Parliament on 4 November. Senior Minister for State Edwin Tong said that PTO will contact individuals who are known to possibly have an interest in a deceased member’s unnominated CPF monies, inviting them to make an application to claim those funds.
These are people who either approach the CPF Board to inform them of the deceased’s passing, those listed as the death informant in ICA records, and family members of the deceased as reflected in ICA’s records.
According to Mr Tong, PTO managed to distribute 88% of unnominated CPF monies over the last five years.
He added, “As at end 2018, unclaimed, unnominated CPF monies make up 132 million of the 211 million of unclaimed monies held by PTO. PTO continues to make efforts to locate the legally entitled beneficiaries of unclaimed monies and they do so by making phone calls, writing to them in several occasions, and also in some cases making house visits.”
He then encouraged individuals who may be legally entitled to the money to submit their application, noting that there is no time limit. People can come forward at any time to make their claim.
Mr Tong also explained, “To ensure that the monies are distributed to the rightful applicants, PTO requires that an applicant produce documentary proof to support his claim and also the eligibility entitlement. Where necessary, PTO will assist the applicant to obtain the necessary documents from the relevant agencies by making a request on behalf of the applicant or also supporting the request for information.”
When asked by Non-Constituency Member of Parliament Daniel Goh why some people might end up not making a claim for the monies, Mr Tong said that most people who PTO reaches out to will make the claim. The monies left unclaimed are for those who PTO has been yet unable to trace.
Now, the S$211 million in PTO left unclaimed is for the past six years only. TOC reached out to the Ministry of Law on 22 October to ask what was the unclaimed amount in previous years but have yet to receive a reply.
The question is, will Singaporeans end up dying before they are able to spend their CPF monies? And will they know where that money goes in the event of their death, especially given that many like Mr Zol do not have beneficiaries to nominate?

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

《联合早报》民调显示 近七成网民反对疫情下举行选举

上周,总理接受本地主流媒体采访,指如果经济大致上还能正常运作,大家还能办公、工作组织事情,即便不能大群体群聚,但还是能“把事情办得来”,仍可以采取适当措施,调整一般举行选举的方式。 他也提及例如以色列也在疫情下举行选举,至于美国部分州属也进行了总统初选,“这些是可以办到、解决的事。” 不过,《联合早报》早前进行民调,多达1万1600余网民参与投票,不过其中有近七成、约67巴仙的群众,不同意在疫情下举行选举。 吊诡的是,不久后民调就被抽起,迄今在该报官网的民调已找不到网民投票记录。 3月中旬,总理李显龙在上周六(14日)才在脸书贴文释放信息,指如需要在疫情过去签前选举,需采取必要防疫措施;隔日(15日)韩咏梅就发表评论附和领导人,在疫情可控情况下举行选举的论述。 截至今日,全球累计确诊78万人,其中美国灾情最严重,确诊人数已飙升至16余万人。 至于在今年3月初举行议会选举的以色列,截至3月2日,全国有10起确诊。但截至31日,累计确诊人数已飙升至4千695起,16人病故。 新加坡截至目前为止,已有879例确诊病例,有三人不幸病故。

竞选活动出现小学生 王乙康遭投报违反选举条规

据悉周日(7月5日)有人向警方报案,指控人民行动党三巴旺集选区候选人王乙康,让小学生涉及竞选活动,此举违反选举法令。 根据选举法(第218章)第83条文,不得参与选举活动的人士,包括中小学生、非公民、破产、或有犯罪记录者,都不得参与选举活动。 报案者指出,初始并没想过报警,但是看到似乎有人想将竞选活动变成恐惧行为,才采取行动。报案者声称警方已展开调查行动。 “我接获来自东陵分局的电话,指我提供的投报内容非常详细,她将会对此展开调查,意味着警方已经针对我的投报,对王乙康展开调查。” 据悉,报案人昨日到警局招供,但是到目前为止,还未有任何相关的警方文告。 早前有报导指出,王乙康曾在脸书分享和一名穿着校服的男孩交谈的短片,随后被告知此举违反了选举规则。他在7月2日在脸书发帖,表示已经删除有关短片,并对此事道歉。他表示,和该名居住在三巴旺的小男孩交流愉快,“这里是个成长的好地方”。 根据《国会选举法令》,中小学生被禁止参与任何竞选活动,即表示他们不被允许出现在竞选视频内,或参与任何竞选宣传活动。 不知这位原教育部长是否已知晓报案事件,他在今天(7月7日)下午在脸书帖文,分享闻榴莲的图片,并写道“在当我处理这棘手课题时,竞选活动暂停一下”。就不知所谓的“棘手课题”指的是他手上的榴莲,还是遭投报事件。

Osman Sulaiman: Nothing to be thankful about Singapore’s “Malay” president

Khan Osman Sulaiman, a businessman and former Reform Party candidate in the…

终生健保4月起扩大范围 资援妊娠并发症患者

终身健保计划将从今年4月1日开始,将为患有妊娠并发症的女性提供部分经济支持,而有妊娠糖尿病史的女性,也将更容易获得早期筛查。 从现有的住院病患索赔限额开始,终身健保计划覆盖范围将扩展至24种严重妊娠和分娩并发症,包括子痫和产后出血的住院治疗。 卫生部高级政务部长唐振辉指出,有关的变动将在一年内让4000名病患受惠。他是在3月6日国会拨款委员会辩论部门预算开支时,如是说到。 定期体检提供筛查津贴 自6月开始,该部门将依据“定期体检,益您一生”(Screen for Life)计划,为患有妊娠期糖尿病史的妇女进行津贴筛查。妊娠期糖尿病是妇女在怀孕期间才会出现的糖尿病情况,而会出现类似情况的孕妇,更容易患上2型糖尿病。 卫生部高级政务部长许连碹(Amy Khor)博士则提到,在定期体检计划下,他们将自动获得心血管风险筛查津贴,而且无需再采用线上糖尿病风险评估工具以获取资格了。 她是在回应麦波申选区议员陈佩玲的提问时,如此说到。陈佩玲询问在预防性健康领域,政府为女性提供了什么支援,毕竟女性的寿命更长。 荷兰-武吉知马集选区的迪舒沙也提出了有关财务支援的问题。 列出妊娠期并发症清单…