“I didn’t ask for government welfare. I just want to take out my own money and save myself. I feel so helpless. What happened to the Singapore government?”

Mr Sim Kay Chuan, a 56-year-old Singaporean who suffered from heart problems in 2015 had an operation two years ago, leaving his heart’s left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at 37% performance. The normal LVEF for a person ranges from 55% to 70%.

This condition left Mr Sim weak. On top of that, the medicine that he has to take also lowers his blood pressure, making him susceptible to fainting spells even when walking.

Mr Sim has since exhausted his savings as he is unable to work due to his medical condition for the past two years. That’s why he applied to withdraw his CPF to ease his family expenses.

However, the authorities refused his application on the grounds that he did not qualify, citing four conditions.

According to the official website of the CPF Board, in order to apply to withdraw some of your CPF savings on medical grounds, they need to certify that you:

  1. are physically or mentally incapacitated from ever continuing in any employment; or
  2. have a severely impaired life expectancy; or
  3. lack capacity within the meaning of Section 4 of the Mental Capacity Act (MCA) and the lack of capacity is likely to be permanent; or
  4. are terminally ill.

According to Mr Sim, he started to experience physical health problems since 2014. It was only until when he almost fainted after crossing an overbridge that he visited a Chinese traditional physician and was advised to seek treatment in hospital.

After examination in a hospital, Mr Sim was told that his heart is failing and he needed surgery.

Mr Sim underwent the surgery as advised. He was then told by the attending doctor that he is not to carry any weight more than 5kg and that he would not able to work for a long time.

In the two years since his operation, Mr Sim has tried applying for work but failed to secure any employment due to his medical condition. He could not take up jobs such as private hire driver either because of his tendency to feel giddy and possibly lose consciousness.

Currently, his wife is the sole breadwinner. She works as a welfare coordinator and earns a take-home pay of S$1,800. According to Mr Sim, their savings have been exhausted due to his medical treatments and medicines to lower his blood cholesterol.

Considered divorce to ease his wife’s burden

He is worried about the family’s current financial conditions and even thought about divorce to avoid burdening his wife further. His wife refused to do so and believes that they should cherish and take care of each other.

Mr Sim’s wife has to wake up as early as 5am, spend three hours on commute and work for nine hours each day. Besides paying the monthly expenses, she also gives her husband S$20-30 as daily pocket money.

At Mr Sim’s flat in Jurong, his wife showed TOC stacks of pawn tickets for jewellery which she had pawned, one by one for hundreds of dollars, in order to pay for medical bills and other expenses over the past two years.

Desperate in his current situation, Mr Sim resorted to applying for early withdrawal of his CPF monies which is now kept in the retirement account.

CPF states Mr Sim can still work and SSO states wife can provide for family

However, CPF Board in its letter to Mr Sim dated in August this year, said that after checking with the doctor, Mr Sim is  “not physically incapacitated from ever continuing in any employment” (emphasis ours), and therefore they are unable to process his application to withdraw his CPF Retirement sum of around $18,000.

When Mr Sim visited Mr Patrick Tay, MP for West Coast GRC, other than writing an appeal to the CPF board, his case was also referred to the Social Service Office (SSO).

According to SSO’s letter from the Social Welfare Department dated 27 May 2019, his application for financial assistance was rejected on the basis that his wife was still working with a stable income. It wrote, “after careful consideration, we assessed that your family is able to support its basic living expenses.”

There was no follow-up letter from the CPF Board other than a phone call to Mr Sim to saying that they found nothing wrong with his medical condition, once again rejecting his application.

So right now, Mr Sim can only start drawing from his CPF retirement account in another nine years when he turns 65. And according to him, he will only be able to withdraw about S$250 each month.

Mr Sim’s story was reported on by local Chinese press Shin Min daily last month.

Regret going for his heart surgery

The rejection by the CPF Board and the SSO made Mr Sim feel helpless, leading him to question why his own money cannot be used when he needs it the most. This is especially since he has no idea how long he has left to live due to his heart condition.

“I regret going for the surgery,” said Mr Sim.

“Ended up spending so much money and now becoming a burden for my wife. A couple of my friends who are in similar situation as me, share my thoughts.”

He went on to state that he does not want to depend on the government for hand-outs. Instead, he just wants to get his hard-earned money so that he can live with dignity and not rely on his wife for hand-outs.

Mr Sim also voiced out against the government’s narrative that old men would go Batam and spend all their money there, “How can you use the stories of a few individuals as a reason to restrict the use of people’s money?”

Sold HDB seven years ago

TOC had written to CPF board for their comments on this story in September and October this year but has not received any acknowledgement or reply till date.

Just in case CPF decides to disclose private information about Mr Sim and his wife as they had in the past with other families, we have to note that the couple is currently living in a BTO which they purchased five years ago. Prior to that, they lived in a rental flat for around two years after selling their previous flat for around $200,000.

When asked what they did with the money, Mr Sim shared that he had tried to dabble in business but failed. Part of the money was used to pay off debts which wife had incurred when borrowing money to pay for her mother’s medical fees and also for the flat that they are currently staying in.

The couple have a daughter, but when asked about her, they said she has her own expenses and family to look after.

Subscribe
Notify of
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

网友指华文绘本含种族歧视内容 出版社停售回收 图书馆下架

有网民投诉华文儿童绘本《谁会赢?》涉及种族歧视,出版社名创教育决定停止销售和发行该绘本,并且进行回收。 网友Umm Yusof于上周五(7月17日)在脸书帖文指出,他从图书馆借了《谁会赢?》绘本返家,阅读后发现书中的反派角色“毛毛”与其他皮肤白皙的认为形成鲜明对比,被使用明显的种族话术语进行描述,极具种族主义色彩。 他在帖文中附上了绘本内容,指“毛毛”是一名校园小霸王,皮肤黝黑且一头卷发,目中无人,还经常欺负同学。网友也表示,绘本故事情节并没有出现任何常见的救赎内容,如“毛毛”只是被误解,或最后改变态度和主角成为朋友等,反而是“毛毛”从头到尾都毫无悔意,最终两人在食堂大打出手,被送入校长室。 因此,Umm Yusof质疑绘本所要传达的资讯,似乎继续沿用老一辈华裔所说的“别做坏事,小心Ah Neh(黑皮肤的人)会抓你”,在书中存有“臭印度人”的印象。他更指故事中唯一的皮肤黝黑者,是个令人非常讨厌的反派,但是外表和故事情节其实并没有任何关联。 他也在帖文中附上了出版社、作者、出版年份等详情。 值得一提的是,依据推广华语委员会的资料,《谁会赢?》绘本也是小学华文课外读物参考书之一。 国家图书馆发言人在被询及有关事件时表示,当局已经对绘本进行审核,而这期间,《谁会赢?》也从全国图书馆下架。负责审核的单位是外部图书馆咨询小组(Library Consultative Panel)…

Is one year National Service possible?

~by: Eric Tan Heng Chong~ All eyes are on the new slate…

四鸡蛋进口商不符执照条规 自20日起将被禁止从马国进口鸡蛋

本地鸡蛋进口商因不符合执照条规,自本月20日起,被禁止从马来西亚进口鸡蛋。 食品局在去年四月推出新条规,要求进口商制定业务持续计划,如从主要来源国以外的国家进口至少15巴仙的鸡蛋等,以确保本地鸡蛋来源多元化。 四家进口商分别是明记蛋庄、合成贸易、优良蛋业和Green-Tech蛋工业。 而该四家进口商却没有按照条规,致力于落实相关计划要求,因此被禁止从主要来源进口鸡蛋,但他们仍能够从其他受认证的来源进口鸡蛋。 根据食品局表示,共有四家鸡蛋进口商不符合执照条规,而该四家进口商所进口的鸡蛋占我国总供应量的三成左右,但仍有另外32家鸡蛋进口商仍正常运作,加上本地农场的产量,能够满足公众的需求量,因此无需囤积或抢购鸡蛋。