~by: Eric Tan Heng Chong~

All eyes are on the new slate of opposition MPs and NCMPs. I hope that through their Parliamentary debates they can convince the government to make life better for Singaporeans on issues which the government overlooked. I hope they can pick one salient hot button issue and zero in on it to change it for the good of Singapore. I look forward to the fruits of the water shed 2011 GE.

There is one issue I hope Parliament will find time debate. It is the possibility of shortening the length of National Service. Although this has been raised by one of the Presidential Election candidates before, I believe we can take the idea further with a proposed solution. The proposal which I am suggesting for NS can make a significant impact on our lives.

National Service (NS) requires all male Singaporean citizens and second-generation permanent residents who have reached the age of 18 to enrol in the Singapore Armed Forces (SAF), Singapore Police Force (SPF), or the Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF).They serve 22- 24 months as Full Time National Servicemen (NSFs). Most NSFs serve in the SAF, as part of the army.

Despite being introduced in 1967, and being accepted as a way of life, NS can still arouse passions. In the May general election, a guest speaker at an Opposition rally got the loudest cheers when he told the audience that as a doctor he saved lives and did NS. He was riposting a comment by a governing party MP candidate who when asked about his NS liability (he was born and educated overseas, coming to Singapore in his thirties) tried to excuse himself by saying he saved babies..

While NS has always been part of our way of life, the length of service has not changed very much. With the rapid change of technology over the last decades, I cannot understand why the period of NS has not changed very much. When I served NS in the very early days, other ranks served 24 months while officers and NCOs above corporals served 30 months. .

So from 1971, all A-level holders, polytechnic graduates and university graduates had to serve 30 months and all others 24 months. It stayed this way until 2005, when all NS men were made to serve between 22 to 24 months. For most Singaporean males, there is not much difference.

There have been regular calls that the period should be cut to 12 months. Singapore is currently among a list of countries with the longest military service exceeding 18 months, just behind Israel and South Korea, with a reservist obligation lasting up to age 40 for enlisted men and 50 for officers. Until 2005 we had one of the longest mandatory military service periods, 30 months.

One reason that it is not possible for us to reduce NS to one year is because while the training for operational readiness of an enlisted man could be completed in one year, the training of an officer takes at least two years. As a result all males got serve NS for two years. But not everyone is cut out to be an officer or will be chosen to be one and so forcing everyone to do two years doesn’t make sense.

My suggestion is to make everyone serve 12 months full time NS, with special incentives to motivate people to want to become officers.

  1. All Singaporean males will do full time NS for 12 months.
  2. However for those who want to be officers, they must qualify to enter University or Polytechnics first and if they are chosen then they will be given the option to enter University or Polytechnics first before NS .This is an incentive for them to be trained to be an officer part time during their university years. Another incentive is to rebrand the OCS course as huge investment in developing leadership skills which will be sought after in the private sector. Upon graduation, he would have also completed his OCS course and received his commission. After which, he will join the others to do one year full time NS.

The second suggestion is not new to the world as the US has already such a scheme in place. In the US, the Reservist Officer Training Course (ROTC) provides 57 per cent of the US Army officers. The ROTC programme is a way of recruiting military officers by offering a university education in exchange for serving in the military after they graduate. They do military training during the weekends and over the long vacations.

On a positive note, this scheme will enhance the status of being an officer and hopefully Singaporean males will compete to get into this programme like gaining admissions into Raffles Institution or Hwa Chong. This country invests heavily in training a SAF officer but somehow it is not recognised. We need a motivated officer corps who will inspire the NS enlisted men and make their   NS experience more meaningful.

In the unfortunate event when there are insufficient candidates wanting to embrace the scheme then we can either decide as a nation if we want to supplement the shortfall of NS officers with professional officers or we can come up with a balloting scheme for those who qualify. I hope we do not need to come to this stage as the incentive of doing your University first and the quality of the officer training programme should motivate our young males to compete for it.

The benefit of serving one year NS will appeal to parents and NS men alike as when Singapore welcomes more foreigners to come and work here, we need to close the gap when our males start their working life. Also I have asked several of my friend’s sons who are serving NS as other ranks and they tell me that they find two years a waste of time. Their responses are not much different from that of their fathers when we served our NS decades ago.

My proposal may not have all the answers or details as it is based on anecdotal evidence. But I believe we should debate this important issue in Parliament and the Minister of Defence should review this aspect of NS. He can revert to Parliament with his findings for all the MPs to scrutinise and debate. They can then decide if we should change the system or remain status quo. The public will enlightened from such a debate and it will reinforce their commitment to National Service.

I served my NS in the early 1970s as a naval officer and completed my reservist as a Captain.

Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Duo arrested for importing more than S$8,000 in counterfeit perfumes and cosmetics

The police have arrested two women, aged 21 and 23, for their…

Will multi-party by-election in Hougang increase choice?

~ By Gordon Lee ~ On the face of it, having more…

何晶:不应下定论群聚拥挤 造成客工宿舍疫情扩散

总理夫人何晶又发表“伟论”!她在周六(5月30日)发文,指出我们不应武断地定论,客工宿舍“群聚、拥挤”的情况,就是造成客工宿舍疫情爆发的主因之一。 何晶也是淡马锡首席执行长。淡马锡控股在疫情爆发后,也与盛裕控股集团寻找并确认博览中心,设立为社区护理设施。 何晶在贴文中解释,例如豪华游轮即便乘客都有独立的客房,但还是造成了疫情爆发;疗养院也不拥挤,监狱同样把囚犯区隔开来,但这些地方都出现了疫情。 社区护理设施(CCF)分为红黄绿区。一些隔离设施的“黄区”仍转变为感染群。她指出,在经过调查后,当局发现这可能是因为他们习惯把食物集中在一起,集体进食的社交习惯。 何晶提及分享食物的社交习惯存在于不同文化,也指她也认为防疫应着重在防止飞沫传播。 故此,她认为在大家反对拥挤客工宿舍、在仓促落实应对疫情的改变前,应先理解病毒的传播途径,以及人们社交习惯的本能。 “听起来像精英口气?” 不过,也有网民留言对何晶这番言论嗤之以鼻,“听起来像精英居高临下的口气,客工群体对我国经济社会作出重大贡献,这种论述似乎严重缺乏同情心。” 网民认为,即便客工的习俗可能造成疫情传播,但暗示这就是主要原因是谬误的,也缺乏基于事实的证明,反而促成分化我者与他者(因文化等)的区别。 杨莉明曾指工地共用工具也可能是传播途径 事实上,人力部长杨莉明在4月25日接受《联合早报》直播访谈, 曾提及专家研究也得知客工之间感染不仅是宿舍问题,他们也有共同工作场所如建筑工地等,而工地中工友间共用工具也可能是传染渠道之一。

Former DPP chief Benjamin Pwee submits application to join SDP

Following an announcement regarding his intention to join a “bigger” and “more effective”…