Author Sudhir Vadaketh is making his foray into the world of videos. Announcing on his website, Sudhirtv.com, that he will be experimenting with videos now – he’s published two videos on his Facebook page so far, discussing the issue of race in Singapore – Mr Vadaketh said that while writing remains his first love, his experimentation with videos will be part of his own “professional growth, reskilling, continuing media education” as he hopes to start his own media business.
Mr Vadaketh singled out three video personalities that who became the catalyst for him to start down this new part: Law and Home Affairs Minister K Shanmugam, Singaporean influencer Michelle Chong, and Isreali-Palestinian vlogger Nuseir Yassin aka Nas Daily.
Mr Vadaketh says these three individuals have “contributed to an increasingly ideologically-biased video landscape”.
Starting with the Law Minister, he explains, “Shanmugam is a constant video presence on big issues, for instance commenting on Preeti and Subhas. I am told, among other things, that those “interviews” are often scripted, staged, and re-shot if he doesn’t like something. There is no pushback. Nobody would dare, for example, ask him whether the government made a mistake in publishing the Brownface ad, something journalists in any other developed country would feel comfortable doing.”

Mr Vadaketh stresses that this isn’t journalism or authentic reporting, describing it as ‘Shanmugam TV’, and lamenting that he’s not sure viewers understand thing.
As for Michelle Chong and Nuseir Yassin, Mr Vadaketh says that while he likes their style and some of their works, they have “knowingly or not become part of the PAP’s band of useful idiots”. Specifically, he notes Michelle Chong’s works for the government, which he agrees is ‘great’ but he also expressed shocked at her video interview of Shanmugam about the fake news law.
“The interplay between truth and fiction is a key tenet of any art form. Imagine my surprise, then, that a Singaporean artist would willingly help politicians take away that power,” he said.
He added, “I’ve met Michelle Chong once, briefly, she seems like a lovely person, but I’ve also been told that she’ll say/perform anything for money—which is troubling for all sorts of reasons.”
Mr Vadaketh also noted that her video didn’t mention that it was sponsored by the government, an omission which he asserts is unethical. “But this appears to be the way of the influencer world, take money and keep quiet about it.”
Turning his attention Nas Daily, Mr Vadaketh notes that the videos are ‘gross oversimplification of complicated problems’ which he believes do a disservice to the world.
“His superficial commentary on Singapore is proof that one can’t parachute into a place and understand it. There are a million critiques to choose from, but I’ll give you just one: it is absurd for a Muslim-Arab to call Singapore, a country with institutional discrimination against Muslims, an “almost perfect country”. But that’s what happens when you observe the veneer of multiculturalism and are wilfully ignorant about real problems,” said the author.
However, Mr Vadaketh conceded that Mr Yassin’s move to Singapore is great for the country.
Still, Ms Chong and Mr Yassin’s dependence on government funding hinders their ability to act and speak freely, Mr Vadaketh pointed out.
“And that is why I worry that the video world is increasingly ideologically-biased. Unlike say the written word, for which Singaporeans can now access a whole range of views online,” he lamented.

First steps into video

Mr Vadaketh then went on to address a few mistakes he’s spotted in his first couple of videos including the choices in background music, delivery, and typos in the subtitles as well as the race-related jokes he made in his post-credit scene and the lack of balance when he didn’t include at least one opposition politician in his criticisms.
On the last point, Mr Vadaketh emphasises that he is not affiliated to any party and has in the part openly criticised both the PAP and WP. He reiterates that his political preferences remain the same.

“My political preference has been unchanged for the past ten years: happy with the PAP in power, but it needs to be cut down to size, we need a lot more opposition parliamentarians. We must deny the PAP its two-thirds majority because it keeps recklessly toying with our sacred constitution (like recently with the reserved presidency),” he clarified.
As such, he pointed out that while he called out several PAP politicians in his video, he made the mistake of not including even one opposition politician. “There is an obvious reason for this—the PAP ones have a much bigger responsibility to deal with all these issues,” said Mr Vadaketh but also conceded that he could have included a comment to better reflect his non-partisanship.

What’s next for video and Vadaketh?

While this is an avenue he is keen on experimenting with, Mr Vadaketh specified that he’s not sure it would be a regular thing as it is “terribly nerve-wracking and a big distraction from writing.”
However, he adds, “If it ever does become so, I would love to try and emulate The Daily Show or Patriot Act, knowing of course that I’ll never ever be half as good as Hasan or the rest. But even that might be good enough for Singapore/South-east Asia.”
Mr Vadaketh notes he would want to tackle a range of issues from politics to technology, food, sports and more.
To that end, Mr Vadaketh says he’s having discussions about building a video team and tapping into funding sources such as the crowd-funding membership platform Patreon.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

MOM: Productivity declined for the first time in a decade

For the first time in at least 10 years, Singapore’s labour productivity…

Being myself..

  By Marilyn Lai Monday, 4 December, 2006 I need to write…

Chen Show Mao/PA dispute: Presidential candidates weigh in

Update: Mr Tan Jee Say has responded this evening at Toa Poyoh…

谷歌进行全球调查 狮城孩童最早拥手机平板电脑

出乎意料,新加坡除了是全球消费最高的城市,更是最早让孩童拥有智能手机或平板电脑的国家,平均年龄是8岁。 家中的孩子几岁开始拥有智能手机或是平板电脑?相信很多父母都曾经面对这个问题,尤其是年轻的父母。美国科技巨头谷歌(Google)日前根据这项问题,展开了一项调查,访问了全球的家长和教师,包括400名新加坡家长和200名教师。受访家长平均都拥有一名18岁以下的孩子。 有关调查结果发现,新加坡家长时最早的,平均在孩子8岁时,就为他们提供智能手机或平板电脑了。就全球的情况而言,平均在孩童10岁时就拥有智能手机或平板电脑。在亚洲方面,除了新加坡,日本这个高科技国家,当地孩童也是在平均10岁时才拥有可上网的手机或平板电脑。印度尼西亚的孩童则是参与调查的国家中最迟拥有智能手机或平板电脑的,他们的平均年龄是11岁。 主要关注三项问题 有关调查显示,82巴仙的新加坡父母认为,现今的孩童需要掌握数码技能和知识,才能在这个社会生存。然而,有关调查并没有透露新加坡孩童在使用智能手机或平板电脑时,家长是否有管制,以及孩童的“荧幕时间”(screen time)是否超出平均。 新加坡家长在给孩子使用智能手机或平板电脑时,主要关注的问题有三项,即孩子的隐私和安全、是否分享太多信息、以及孩子是否又接触到不恰当的网络内容。 对此,媒体通识理事会曾上载了《数码时代育儿手册》,能够指导父母针对以上三项问题做出适当措施。 有关的三项措施包括限制荧幕使用时间、教孩子保护隐私,以及设定密码保障孩子安全上网。