Spotlighting the 10 wealthiest charities in Singapore by donations and business subsidiaries, it was revealed in a Sunday Times article that the National University of Singapore (NUS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU) and the Singapore University of Technology and Design (SUTD) have billions of dollars in reserves.
In the financial year that ended in March last year, NUS apparently collected $227 million in donations which adds to its investment income of S$620 million and reserves of S$9.5 billion.
As for NTU, the university raised $50 million in donations on top of $149 in investment income in that same year. It has also $3.7 billion in reserves.
SUTD clocked in the smallest reserves of the three – but still significant – of $1.2 billion which is compounded by S$27 million it raised in donations and $66 million it earned in investment incomes for the same period.
Speaking to Sunday Times, an NUS spokesperson said the university utilises its investment income from its endowment and reserves to finance operational costs, scholarships, research and to promote entrepreneurship.
The spokesperson was responding to the question of why these universities are still actively fund-raising and seeking out donations when they already have such a healthy reserve.
She elaborated, “To enhance the long-term financial sustainability of NUS, we have to continue to raise funds to maintain the health of our endowment and reserves.”
An NTU spokesman, meanwhile, said that raising funds was essential in order to reduce the institutions reliance on public funding, noting that multiple sources of funding are necessary to enable NTU to “deliver quality education and research and build a culture of innovation and community engagement that translate into jobs and real benefits for society.”

Billions in reserves for whose benefit?

Following the Sunday Times article, questions started to surface from the public on why these public institutions need such a massive reserve to the tune of billions? How much is enough? Most pertinently, why are tuition fees so high – and still rising – when these universities clearly do not need the money?
Sharing a photo of the table detailing the universities’ income and reserves over the last three years, HR expert Martin Gabriel pointedly said on a Facebook post:
“Our Universities are sitting on billions of dollars! With NUS & NTU accumulating 9.5 and 3.7 billion dollars in reserves respectively. And yet we educate foreign students with that money, while our very own people go overseas to seek a tertiary education or for those who cannot afford, is totally denied.”
He also highlighted how local students are constantly encouraged to take on skills training for blue collar jobs instead of pursuing a university degree as well as the fact that university fees have been on a steady rise.

Commenters on Mr Gabriel’s post suggested that getting Singaporeans into blue collar jobs and importing foreign students was a way to increase the population of Singapore:

Taiwanese-based Singapore activist Roy Ngerng also voiced his opinion on the matter of these billion dollar reserves. Mr Ngerng said in a Facebook post:
“In fact, I have calculated that Singaporeans are paying enough in taxes to fund the complete operations of Singapore’s public universities as well as other tertiary institutions like the polytechnics, ITEs and arts schools, but Singaporeans are still made to pay S$1 billion dollars in fees in 2017, to help these institutions earn S$1.3 billion in surpluses.”
The activist pointed out the flow of these earnings from the universities. He elaborated that the government uses taxes to fund the full operation of these institutions who then charge their Singaporean students some of the most expensive fees in the world. Those profits are then channelled into the national reserves which then flow into the country’s sovereign wealth funds in order to earn even more profits for the country.
“In other words, Singaporeans already pay more than enough in taxes for their education, but the PAP government makes Singaporeans pay additional fees (the 5th highest in the world), to let these institutions earn surpluses. While youths who graduate go into debt.”
Mr Ngerng asks, “Is this fair?”

Rising fees despite healthy reserves

It sure doesn’t sound fair at all. Back in march, local universities had announced an increase in their annual tuition fees for 2019, specifically for the medical and dentistry programs. The Ministry of Education has said in a statement at the time that subsidiaries will cover almost 75% of the total cost of education.
In detail, there was a S$500 increase in medical and dental course fees for Singaporean citizens in medical and a S$900 and S$1,050 increase in fees for PRs and international students respectively. That brings the total course fees to S$39,550 and S$60,800 respectively. The largest increase was for the full course fees for students who are not recipients of the MOE tuition grant – this went up by a whopping S$2,700. That brings the annual fee up to S$152,000.
Apart from that, NUS’s music programme saw an increase of S$500 for citizens, S$700 for PRs and S$1,050 for international students. Again, the biggest increase was seen in the annual fees for students who don’t qualify for the MOE grant. This went up by S$4,200 to S$117,350.
Similar increases were implemented in NTU as well with their medical course fees rising by S$700 for PRs and S$1,050 for international students bringing annual fees to S$48,600 and S$74,250 respectively.
Now, while the increase in fees for Singapore citizens were the smallest of the three categories, the fact remains that university fees in Singapore are extremely high. But given the amount of reserves these universities apparently have, it begs the question of why is there a need to increase tuition fees at all which only serves to increase the financial burden on students and parents?
As Mr Ngerng asked, “Is this fair?”

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

艺人称本地采购物资“出份力打疫战” 却引网民挞伐

为防范新型冠状病毒,本地不少居民抢购口罩致使供不应求。不过有艺人声称在新加坡收集物资“希望出份力打败这场疫战”,却引发本地网友的不满。 近日,新加坡双胞胎组合BY2成员Yumi(白纬玲)和姐姐Miko(白纬芬)就在微博上发文,表示在新加坡搜购物资,希望为防范新冠肺炎出一份力,同时还晒出与孙燕姿的合照。 “说好的比赛后约起来 ,在新加坡到处扫货收集物资,希望能出一分力,一起打败这场疫战!#坚定希望中国加油#” 不过必须注意的是,原贴文只是提到“扫货收集物资”,但并未明确说明如何使用这些资源。 不料却引发本地网友的不满,网民纷纷表示,不仅仅是中国本身缺口罩,新加坡的口罩也在断货中,因此要帮忙,也要先帮新加坡。 网友 Dan Loh :所以我们清空我们的货是为了供应给别人 网友 Bryant…

警:已接获18宗投诉 WhatsApp沦为行骗工具

诈骗分子无孔不入,连WhatsApp也沦为行骗工具了。 警方昨日(2月19日)发文告指出,指2019年12月至今,已经接获18宗涉及即时通讯应用程序WhatsApp的诈骗投诉。 歹徒入侵到他人账号中,然后发出WhatsApp简讯给受害者,要求受害者转发六个数字的验证码。一旦受害者转发了该验证码,其账号就会被侵入,而受害者则无法在使用该账号。 歹徒会入侵友人的WhatsApp账户,以各网络商店如Lazada、Shopee或Qoo10的假幸运抽奖游戏,要求受害者协助签署或索取奖金奖品,以便骗取受害者的联络电话、信用卡或提款卡的照片,并要求受害者转发一次性密码。当受害者照做后,不久就会发现自己的信用卡或提款卡遭盗用了。 根据之前报导,也曾有诈骗分子利用类似的策略,通过脸书和Instagram等社交媒体平台行骗。 警方建议民众不要与他人分享账户验证码,并且对通过WhatsApp平台收到的异常请求提高警惕,即便有关的请求是发自自己的联络人。 WhatsApp用户也受促启用该程序的双层验证功能,以防止账户遭他人侵入破坏。

WP’s Gerald Giam helps residents set up TraceTogether app during his house visits

The Workers’ Party (WP) Member of Parliament (MP) for Aljunied GRC Gerald…

连总理也被“问候”? 星展香港分行遭涂鸦不雅字眼

今早本地社交媒体疯传,星展银行在香港分行的玻璃窗疑被涂鸦不雅字眼,相信是被当地示威者恶搞,包括总理和本地执政党人民行动党都被侮辱“问候”。 今日稍迟星展银行发言人向《海峡时报》证实此事,并表示有关涂鸦今早已被清理。 虽然涂鸦者何以向星展银行分行泄愤动机未明,不过涂鸦中出现总理字眼,相信与总理李显龙此前发表的言论有关。 回顾上月17日,李显龙在环球总裁大会,认为尽管香港示威者提出“五大诉求,缺一不可”,但这些诉求并不是为了解决香港问题,而是为了羞辱和把香港政府拉下来。 然后怎样?可能有些人被追问,会说我不知道,无论如何我只希望这么做(指让港府下台),这是令人遗憾的状况。” 此外,在上月15日的全国职工总会大会(NTUC Conference)时,致辞评论香港近5个月来的反送中热潮,示威活动显示人民深深的不满,其中获得最大的反响为政治议题。 但他认为示威者更像是在“羞辱”(humiliate)政府而不是解决现在的问题,并直指如果我国如香港式举办大型抗议活动,将可能会“玩完”。 对于新加坡总理的言论,中国内地和香港网民的观点两极化,总理被中国媒体视为是“社交媒体英雄”(social media hero)。中国网民赞扬,微博上不断被转载该演讲的帖子,同时中国网民也赞赏新加坡的司法制度、政府效率很高等。同时也被中国官媒《人民日报》旗下的《环球时报》所报导。 香港反送中抗争仍持续,新加坡企业在香港的投资也受影响,包括丰树北亚商业信托(Mapletree…