photo: nationalgallery.sg

Based on the Auditor-General’s Office (AGO) latest report, it found multiple weaknesses in the financial governance of the National Gallery development project which “did not give assurance that public funds has been properly managed”.
The report was made public today (16 July), following the AGO’s audit of government accounts for the 2018/2019 financial year.
The National Gallery development project is a project completed in 2015 within the approved budget of S$532 million under the Ministry of Culture, Community and Youth (MCCY), and is managed by the National Gallery Singapore (NGS) through a Funding Agreement (FA).
“AGO’s test checks revealed weaknesses such as waivers of contractual provisions involving $13 million without due scrutiny by MCCY, and inadequate monitoring (including the lack of timely audits) to ensure that the final sum to be paid for the main construction contract was properly supported,” said the report.
AGO pointed out that the FA didn’t detail out who is supposed to approve waivers of contractual provisions. If that is not all, “MCCY did not explicitly give authority to NGS to decide on such waivers”.
Despite not gaining approval, AGO stated that NGS went on without due scrutiny by MCCY.
In addition, AGO noted that the Ministry only questioned NGS regarding the waivers in September 2018, one year after the construction contract has been issued and the final payment has been made.
Apart from that, there was no adequate monitoring mechanism placed by the Ministry to ensure “that the waivers with substantial financial implications were highlighted for its attention on a timely basis”.
Besides that, the report also mentioned that there was “a significant gap” between the last monthly status report and the last audit of the project expenditure. In fact, the Ministry only scheduled the final audit in the second half of 2018, which is close to a year after the final account was given and the payments were made. It also noted that it was not aware of the waivers granted until a year after all the accounts were issued and payments settled.
“The waivers of contractual provisions had significant financial implications amounting to $13 million. There is hence a need for MCCY to strengthen its oversight to ensure financial prudence in the use of public funds managed by NGS on its behalf,” the report stated.
As such, AGO felt that MCCY should have had a “proper governance framework and key controls” of the National Gallery development project, given that it is the owner of NGS.
“These include ensuring that the FA sets out clear roles and responsibilities of NGS and its Board, and that decisions involving large sums of public funds are made only after obtaining MCCY’s approval,” it added.
In response, the Ministry said that despite the challenges to re-develop two gazetted national monuments and unique requirements of an art infrastructure, NGS still managed to complete the project within the time frame and approved budget. However, both MCCY and NGS agree that the processes can be improved.

Insufficient oversight in management of contract variations

There were also lapses found in the main construction contract, exhibition fit-out contracts and integrated consultancy services contract in the National Gallery Development project, AGO said. The total value of the contracts amounted to S$458.98 million.
Some of the lapses include not obtained approvals before contract variations were carried out, approval obtained from incorrect approving authority and failure to deduct costs for incomplete works, among others.
Out of the 403 contract variations checked, AGO found that there were lapses in the approval of 142 variations amounting to S$12.4 million.
“AGO also found two instances under the main construction contract where works provided for in the contract were not carried out. Contract variations should have been issued to deduct the costs from the contract sum. However, this was not done, resulting in an estimated overpayment of $11,500,” the report revealed.
It added that in total, the estimated overpayment for works not done was S$265,800.
As such, AGO explained that in order for financial prudence and discipline to be maintained, it is crucial for approvals to be obtained from the right authorities and costs deduction for incomplete works must be done to gain full value for the public funds spent

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

AGC issues statement on reduced sentences of former City Harvest Church leaders

Attorney’s General Chamber (AGC) has responded to queries regarding the reduced sentences…

It could be the end of Orchard Road ice-cream carts when its owners hang up their license

For decades, friendly uncles selling ice-cream in their unique carts have been…

A key maker and his dying trade

A dying trade but one which afford this uncle a livelihood on the streets. Deborah Choo.

精英制度忽略贫富差距复杂因素 严燕松冀扶持同胞携手共进

尽管并没有出现在国家信约、国歌中,但似乎精英治国(Meritocracy)被吹捧为治国的“金科玉律”。工人党阿裕尼集选区议员严燕松提醒,精英政治固然对于打击贪腐、裙带关系是很好的准则,但似乎对每个公民都以能力和成就角度看待,而分出次优等级。 他打个比方,对于小孩我们是否也要以精英制度来苛求他们?如果考了不好的成绩,就只能吃快熟面、睡小房间?但对于我们的社会却是:你赚的不多,你就活该拥有糟糕的生活条件。 对此严燕松提及贫富差距中的复杂因素,则就好比一些人起跑条件优越,提前20米、跑道畅通无阻、还有良师指导,但遗憾的是,有些人的起跑线却可能从后方10米开始。 他指出,工人党对新加坡的愿景是国人都能达成他们的梦想,透过有竞争力的本地公司、活力经济,国人能合力打造这个家园。同时,一个有问责制的健全机制,比任何政党都更能持久。 要实现这愿景,就必须确保家庭能抵御生活中的风暴、校园能让学生为生存做好准备;社会安全网也能确保那些不慎跌倒的人,能够再次站起。 然而精英制度不看这些复杂因素,仅强调个人成就。“但我们是一个国家,不是一家企业。我们是同胞们的守护者。我们需要扶助彼此走完赛道。” 严燕松是在新加坡透视论坛,为“展望2030年新加坡政治”的对话会上,这么指出。 受邀嘉宾也包括卫生部兼通讯及新闻部高级政务部长普杰立医生,以及前进党非选区议员潘群勤。 严燕松也强调,目前面对的问题尤为复杂,需要各界的集思广益,而不是比赛谁能更快提出好主意,异议人士也不该被指责,“所有利益相关者应该合作而不是竞争,以找到应对挑战的最佳解决方案。” 普杰立:两党制由国人决定 回溯2011年,新加坡总理李显龙,曾表示两党制在新加坡根本行不通。治国最关键的是人才,唯有让A队有最大的成功机会,才能保障国家的前途,不能为了反对党所说的“买保险”,而去削弱A队。 对此,有与会者在会上抛出质问,从去年选举可见,人民希望看到更多反对党声音,行动党是否支持这种观点。…