Photo Credit: Singapore Police Force/Facebook

Evonne Keak Yan Ting, a 24-yr-old female, was slammed with one year of supervised probation on Tuesday (18 June), after she pleaded guilty to two charges last month – using criminal force to stop a public servant from discharging their duty; and verbally abusing a public servant.

On 4 July 2018, three police officers who were patrolling around Hill Street spotted a couple on an e-scooter and wanted to stop them. But the duo escaped after noticing the officers, which prompted them to give the couple a chase on foot before losing sight of them.

In the same vicinity, one of the officers saw Keak and approached her, however, she continuously tried to move away.

Sergeant Siti Nurdiana Khairuddin held on to Keak, in an attempt to stop her from moving forward. It was claimed that Sergeant Siti’s action to restraint Keak was because she was trying to cross a road with oncoming traffic.

Retaliating to that, the 24-year-old pushed the female officer once on her chest.

Soon later, the officers found out that she was not one of the e-scooter riders that they were chasing but still arrested Keak anyway because she had pushed Sergeant Siti.

Keak also uttered vulgarities at them in the car after she was arrested.

In delivering his judgement, District Judge Tan Jen Tse also instructed her to do 80 hours of community service, and for her father to provide a S$5,000 bond to guarantee her good behaviour.

However, the merchandising specialist will not be serving her sentence immediately because Deputy Public Prosecutor (DPP) Lim Ying Min requested for a two-week stay of execution to appeal against the sentence.

DPP Lim is pushing for four weeks’ jail, mentioning that Keak has “sufficient maturity and therefore fully able to understand the consequences of her actions”.

The prosecutor continued, “This is not a case where the accused is below 21 years; she was 23 years old when she committed the offence… To impose probation is a slippery slope. The question is, where should the line be drawn? Do we give 22-year-, 23-year-, 24-year-olds probation?”

Generally, probation – which is a rehabilitative, community-based sentencing option – is given to those who are below 21 years old, but at times can be offered to older offenders as well.

However, her lawyer Josephus Tan defended her and said that “she deserved a chance at probation”, and the investigation officer mentioned that it was a one-off, out-of-character episode.

Tan also noted that his client moved away from the officers because she was looking to take a cab “after drinking alone”.

In sentencing Keak to probation, District Judge Tan said that the woman has the right to walk away when the officer wanted to check her, as “both the legal and factual basis” for the police to stop or arrest her was not presented in the accepted facts.

The judge also pointed out that it was “most unfortunate” that one of the officers told his fellow colleague to stop her from crossing the road because “there was no sense that she was in any imminent danger”.

“The police were not even trying to place her under arrest. The action of the push by the accused was precipitated by the officer holding her. And from a reading of harassment charges, her actions were directed at the officers’ acts of arresting her and less so at them personally,” the judge was quoted in TODAY.

Keak could have been sentenced with imprisonment for a term which may extend to 4 years, or with fine, or with both for the charge of criminal assault, and a fine not exceeding $5,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 12 months or both for the charge of verbal abuse.

Upon reading this news, many questioned her sentenced to probation as they felt it was not her fault.

Writing in TODAY’s Facebook page, they said it was the police officers’ mistake for wrongly suspecting her to be one of the e-scooter riders. As such, they supported Keak and highlighted that she was not at wrong for walking away from the officers.

Others blamed the officers for their incompetency in handling this case. Since they wrongly stopped an innocent woman, many asked what is the punishment given to the officers for their mistake – like being demoted or sacked.

A bunch of Facebook users also questioned the need for DPP Lim to ask for a harsher sentence of 4 weeks’ jail term given that it was not really Keak’s mistake. They opined that the Judge’s sentenced to probation is “quite fair”.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

郑国明:探访亨德申路租赁组屋有感 让所有梦想幻灭地方…

撰文:人民之声党成员郑国明   林殊译 在飞往伦敦的班机上,我观看了香港电影《沦落人》(Still human),这是一个非常触动人心的故事,讲述一个半身不遂的老人梁先生(黄秋生饰演)与菲律宾女佣Evelyn Santo(Crisel Consunji饰演)居住在狭窄的公屋的故事。 狭窄昏暗的居住环境,让梁先生和菲佣日常生活显得非常心酸,菲佣的收入非常少,所以急于赚钱将家用寄回家中喂养孩子。然而,两人之间有相当大的差异:梁先生放弃所有获得好生活的希望与梦想;反观菲佣则是持续拥抱她自己无法完成的梦想-成为专业摄影师。 梁先生在意识到菲佣的梦想对他而言非常重要后,两人的生活产生了戏剧性的改变。梁先生为菲佣购买新的相机并帮助他完成摄影作品,好让她能够参加国际比赛,而最终她也胜出,故事的终结在菲佣结束合约持续追逐梦想,而善良的梁先生则继续不怀梦想地生活在公屋中,对生活并无任何期待。 那么,这个电影与我去探访探访亨德森路租赁组屋所见所闻,又有什么关联? 我与我的志工团队前往探访发现,许多住户的生活日复一日,过着捉襟见肘的生活。简言之,他们并没有足够的收入,或者无法从政府机构取得任何有意义的财务援助。有些住户则因健康问题无法工作,要么只能靠收入微薄的儿女,或者和行动不便的另一半共同生活。 其中一名女住戶回想起过往的经验,他向他的议员求助,却被转介到一个又一个的单位,最终不了了之。她说,“真是浪费时间”。另外几名住户则表示他们曾因为无法去邮局充值,结果房子电源被切断。试想,全家包括小朋友需要呆在黑暗之中整晚,直到父母去充值恢复屋内电源。 这到底是什么样的现代租赁组屋生活?…

前进党今晚八时 网络会民活动

新加坡前进党秘书长陈清木医生在联署分享,该党将在今晚(11日)8点,透过网络视讯Zoom平台办会见人民活动,民众也可在该党官方脸书专页观赏直播。 届时,陈清木将分享过去在亚逸拉惹选区服务期间的心得,以及创立前进党的热枕。 有意参与讨论着,可填写以下表格报名参与:https://us02web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_G4FggJYpTbqJKRRpdYvn1w?fbclid=IwAR2VkCG4t2SA4Ztou35HCLQfmja8lLYGsopxS-T1_09OBRGtYaS1L13aQEg