Source : Google map.

Changi General Hospital (CGH) has responded to a case raised by a granddaughter who said that her grandmother had to endure horrible care and treatment in the hospital, during her final days.

On Monday (13 May), Isabella Alexandria Lim took to her Facebook to pen down the terrible experience that she and her family went through while her grandmother was admitted at CGH after a fall.

In all started on 19 February, and during her stay, some of the ill-treatment that the senior citizen had to go through include developing “severe” bedsore, not given heated blanket after a week, and did not have her diapers change until it was requested.

Ms Lim added her grandmother’s health went down the hill quickly after she was warded at CGH, and was said to have only a few days or a week to live.

If that is not all, her family were also badly treated by the staffs who were “unprofessional, unsympathetic and insensitive”. Some of their encounters include not being well-informed of the patient’s situation, “unprofessional and rude” on-call doctor who made no effort to explain things to the family and refusal to run another round of blood tests.

Unable to bear the poor service and insensitive remarks by the staffs at the hospital, the family then moved the senior woman to National University Hospital (NUH), where she received a much better end-of-life care, before passing away on 5 May (Sunday).

At the time of writing, Ms Lim’s post had received 4,400 shares.

Following that, Associate Professor Lim Si Ching, Senior Consultant from the Department of Geriatric Medicine of CGH had issued a statement regarding this incident.

In the statement, Professor Lim started off by saying that the hospital is “saddened by the news of the patient’s passing and empathise with the family’s anguish”.

After conducting a thorough review of the case, she insisted that “appropriate medical care” was provided to Ms Lim’s grandmother during her stay in the hospital.

However, she admits there were “communication gaps which could have prevented” and the hospital “could have done better in engaging the different family members and helping them understand the diagnostic and therapeutic interventions”.

Explaining the patient’s situation, Professor Lim said that she did not respond to antibiotics treatment due to her condition and old age, and the team had explained to the family her treatment options and risks. As such, the family “agreed on conservative treatment that focused on alleviating symptoms that caused discomfort to the patient”.

Highlighting CGH’s preventive measures towards Ms Lim’s grandmother, Professor Lim said that upon finding that she had the risk of developing pressure soles, her team closely monitored “her skin condition, placing her on a pressure-relieving air mattress and turning her at regular intervals to prevent pressure sores from developing while respecting the request from family members to minimise disrupting her rest”.

“We are sorry for the anxiety caused to the family. Owing to patient confidentiality, it would be more appropriate for us to meet with the family to address their concerns, and provide full details of the case. We will do our best to learn from this incident and improve our care delivery processes,” she said.

Here’s the full statement by CGH:

We are aware of a post shared on social media by a late patient’s granddaughter. We are saddened by the news of the patient’s passing and empathise with the family’s anguish.

The patient was admitted to CGH on 7 April 2019 and transferred to NUH on 3 May 2019. Following the family’s feedback, CGH Medical Board conducted a thorough review of the case. Appropriate medical care was given during her stay at CGH. However, there were communication gaps which could have been prevented. While the care team provided regular updates to the family member designated as main caregiver, we could have done better in engaging the different family members and helping them understand the diagnostic and therapeutic interventions by the care team.

During the patient’s stay at CGH, she did not respond to the antibiotics treatment due to pre-existing conditions and advanced age, and required invasive procedures for further investigation. The care team explained the treatment options and risks involved to the family and they agreed on conservative treatment that focused on alleviating symptoms that caused discomfort to the patient. The patient was assessed to be at risk of developing pressure sores. We promptly took preventive measures which included close monitoring of her skin condition, placing her on a pressure-relieving air mattress and turning her at regular intervals to prevent pressure sores from developing while respecting the request from family members to minimise disrupting her rest.

During a subsequent family meeting, the family asked about the process to seek a second opinion at another hospital. The high risks associated with a hospital transfer due to the patient’s condition, was highlighted. The family decided to proceed with the transfer and the care team facilitated with a doctor’s letter to NUH Emergency Department to enable continuity of care.

We are sorry for the anxiety caused to the family. Owing to patient confidentiality, it would be more appropriate for us to meet with the family to address their concerns, and provide full details of the case. We will do our best to learn from this incident and improve our care delivery processes.

After reading this statement, many netizens were displeased with the explanation given by the hospital. Stating their thoughts on TODAY’s and Mothership‘s Facebook pages, they said that CGH shouldn’t just blame everything on miscommunication and look at improving the quality of service that they give to their patients. Besides that, based on the statement released, some even question what if  “appropriate care” just means keeping the patient alive and show less concern. They also highlighted the lack of sincerity in the statement and said it’s merely a template reply.

 

Others pointed out that the statement did not address a lot of other issues that were brought up by Ms Lim like the attitude of the on-call doctor and nurses, as well as the unnecessary rude comments uttered by them. In addition, the statement also did not also reveal who is responsible and what steps had been taken to prevent this. Weng Hon Chan said that no one is taking responsibility, urging the head of CGH to do so.

A large number of them are calling the Ministry of Health (MOH) to step in and look into this matter to prevent similar cases from reoccurring.

On the other hand, many online users also commented on CGH’s Facebook page stating their personal experience while seeking treatment at the hospital. They highlighted the same issues raised by Ms Lim like rude staffs and overall poor services. To make things worse, Yang Mu Ming said that he experienced the same thing 10 years ago when his mother, grandmother and father were admitted, and sadly he said that the situation still remain the same even after a decade.

Netizen named Angela Teo wrote that just like Ms Lim’s grandmother, her grandmother’s health also quickly deteriorated after being warded at CGH for flu and cough. She added that she believed that her grandmother’s health went from bad to worse due to the bad care given to her. As such, she hopes that “CGH retrains their nurses and staff to provide in compassion and ensure proper care is duly given as bills up to 5 figures are paid for every patient’s stay”.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

ICA : Heavy traffic expected for upcoming Hari Raya Haji when using Woodlands and Tuas Checkpoints

The Immigration and Checkpoint Authority (ICA) reminds travellers to expect heavy traffic flow…

42岁脚踏车骑士 翻倒路旁草坪昏迷不治

据本地交通资讯群组分享一段视频,显示一名脚踏车骑士,不知何故昏迷路旁草坪,骑友为他进行心肺复苏急救。尽管男子被送往樟宜综合医院,遗憾的是仍回天乏术,因伤离逝。 据了解事件发生于昨日(13日)早上约9时许,在丹那美拉海岸路(Tanah Merah Coast Road)一带。上述42岁男子和同伴在该路段骑行,却不知何故连人带车翻倒路旁,当场昏迷。 其他骑友见状便立即前来协助,发现他跌伤和心脏骤停,于是立刻为他施展心肺复苏急救,并报警和唤来救护车。 骑士被送往樟宜综合医院,遗憾的是仍回天乏术不治。警方仍在调查事件原因。

呼吁民众勿轻易上当 选委会澄清没招聘临工

新加坡选举委员会在回应媒体询问时澄清,在WhatsApp通讯应用程序传播、为来届“全国大选”招募临工的短信属谣传。 当局发文告作出澄清,也建议民众在未经核实的情况下,避免透露个人资料。 有关的短讯内容指当局为了迎接即将在9月和10月期间“举行的全国大选”,将会招聘500名临时员工,并且将于8月为他们提供培训。 有关的工作时间约10至12小时,工作内容包括“注册”和“设置摊位”,工作地点包括了新加坡的西部、西北部和中部。临时打工费为每天200元,培训期间为每四小时25元。 该信息也呼吁有兴趣的民众提供他们的详细资料,如全名、身份证号码和出生日期。 选委会在声明中指出,“选委会希望做出澄清,WhatsApp上流传招聘临工的消息,并不是当局发出的正式通知”。 有关的短讯中也没有列出招聘单位,只有让有兴趣者联络的电话号码。 网络公民尝试联络有关的号码,但拨通后就直接被带到语音信箱。 发言人也呼吁有意提供有关诈骗短讯消息者,可联络警方热线 1800-255-0000,或提交详情到电邮 www.police.gov.sg/iwitness。欲寻求与诈骗事件相关建议的公众,也可拨打反欺诈热线电话 1800-722-6688,…

民众问“上阵蒙巴登选区吗?” 惟公布选区划分前张媛容也答不上来

当蒙巴登单选区的居民询问,新加坡人民党在该选区的潜能候选人张媛容,来届选举是否还会披甲上阵?这问题难倒了张媛容。因为直到选区范围检讨委员会公布选区前,她也不知道蒙巴登单选区还会不会存在。 随着选举蛩音近,张媛容也积极拜访蒙巴登选民,他在脸书发文表示,自2018年初,就已和人民党同志挨家逐户拜访,几乎已走访了甘榜阿兰(Kampung Arang)组屋至少两次,以及旧机场路组屋至少一次。同时还拜访了海景花园和丹绒加东地区,也把自己的联络邮寄给超过四千家公寓住户。 走访选区期间,最长遇到的问题就是:来届选举张媛容还会上阵蒙巴登选区吗? 这位自2009年就踏入政界、两度挑战行动党守土议员林谋泉的律师,却没办法回答这个问题,因为她自己也不知道到了下届选举,蒙巴登选区还存在吗? 张媛容提到的问题,也是普遍潜能候选人面对的烦恼之一—选区划分。因为单选区可能在选区范围检讨委员会一划之下,就变成集选区,又或者保持不变。 至于总理曾在2016年1月表示,将建议选区范围检讨委会缩小集选区规模,划出更多单选区。 然而, 直到总理李显龙宣布成立选区范围检讨委员会、该委会在选举前公布选区划分报告之前,张媛容和其他候选人都不会知道,下届选举的选举划分会是怎样的。 而在今年3月1日,工人党议员毕丹星曾质问,为何不在上述委会成立后政府自行作出宣布,但贸工部长陈振声则代总理回答,惯例是让委会专业地进行工作,不受不必要媒体关注或公共压力影响。 张媛容认为,其实这对于有意竞选的候选人增加困难,因为该委会很可能是在大选前几周才公布报告,潜在候选人只有极短的时间做准备。 她忆述上届选举,选区范围委会在2015年7月24日公布新的选区地图,但是提名日是在9月1日,从公布选区划分到提名,只有39天。政党或候选人排兵布阵、决定在哪个选区上阵和准备竞选造势的时间非常仓促。…