Source : Google map.

Changi General Hospital (CGH) has responded to a case raised by a granddaughter who said that her grandmother had to endure horrible care and treatment in the hospital, during her final days.

On Monday (13 May), Isabella Alexandria Lim took to her Facebook to pen down the terrible experience that she and her family went through while her grandmother was admitted at CGH after a fall.

In all started on 19 February, and during her stay, some of the ill-treatment that the senior citizen had to go through include developing “severe” bedsore, not given heated blanket after a week, and did not have her diapers change until it was requested.

Ms Lim added her grandmother’s health went down the hill quickly after she was warded at CGH, and was said to have only a few days or a week to live.

If that is not all, her family were also badly treated by the staffs who were “unprofessional, unsympathetic and insensitive”. Some of their encounters include not being well-informed of the patient’s situation, “unprofessional and rude” on-call doctor who made no effort to explain things to the family and refusal to run another round of blood tests.

Unable to bear the poor service and insensitive remarks by the staffs at the hospital, the family then moved the senior woman to National University Hospital (NUH), where she received a much better end-of-life care, before passing away on 5 May (Sunday).

At the time of writing, Ms Lim’s post had received 4,400 shares.

Following that, Associate Professor Lim Si Ching, Senior Consultant from the Department of Geriatric Medicine of CGH had issued a statement regarding this incident.

In the statement, Professor Lim started off by saying that the hospital is “saddened by the news of the patient’s passing and empathise with the family’s anguish”.

After conducting a thorough review of the case, she insisted that “appropriate medical care” was provided to Ms Lim’s grandmother during her stay in the hospital.

However, she admits there were “communication gaps which could have prevented” and the hospital “could have done better in engaging the different family members and helping them understand the diagnostic and therapeutic interventions”.

Explaining the patient’s situation, Professor Lim said that she did not respond to antibiotics treatment due to her condition and old age, and the team had explained to the family her treatment options and risks. As such, the family “agreed on conservative treatment that focused on alleviating symptoms that caused discomfort to the patient”.

Highlighting CGH’s preventive measures towards Ms Lim’s grandmother, Professor Lim said that upon finding that she had the risk of developing pressure soles, her team closely monitored “her skin condition, placing her on a pressure-relieving air mattress and turning her at regular intervals to prevent pressure sores from developing while respecting the request from family members to minimise disrupting her rest”.

“We are sorry for the anxiety caused to the family. Owing to patient confidentiality, it would be more appropriate for us to meet with the family to address their concerns, and provide full details of the case. We will do our best to learn from this incident and improve our care delivery processes,” she said.

Here’s the full statement by CGH:

We are aware of a post shared on social media by a late patient’s granddaughter. We are saddened by the news of the patient’s passing and empathise with the family’s anguish.

The patient was admitted to CGH on 7 April 2019 and transferred to NUH on 3 May 2019. Following the family’s feedback, CGH Medical Board conducted a thorough review of the case. Appropriate medical care was given during her stay at CGH. However, there were communication gaps which could have been prevented. While the care team provided regular updates to the family member designated as main caregiver, we could have done better in engaging the different family members and helping them understand the diagnostic and therapeutic interventions by the care team.

During the patient’s stay at CGH, she did not respond to the antibiotics treatment due to pre-existing conditions and advanced age, and required invasive procedures for further investigation. The care team explained the treatment options and risks involved to the family and they agreed on conservative treatment that focused on alleviating symptoms that caused discomfort to the patient. The patient was assessed to be at risk of developing pressure sores. We promptly took preventive measures which included close monitoring of her skin condition, placing her on a pressure-relieving air mattress and turning her at regular intervals to prevent pressure sores from developing while respecting the request from family members to minimise disrupting her rest.

During a subsequent family meeting, the family asked about the process to seek a second opinion at another hospital. The high risks associated with a hospital transfer due to the patient’s condition, was highlighted. The family decided to proceed with the transfer and the care team facilitated with a doctor’s letter to NUH Emergency Department to enable continuity of care.

We are sorry for the anxiety caused to the family. Owing to patient confidentiality, it would be more appropriate for us to meet with the family to address their concerns, and provide full details of the case. We will do our best to learn from this incident and improve our care delivery processes.

After reading this statement, many netizens were displeased with the explanation given by the hospital. Stating their thoughts on TODAY’s and Mothership‘s Facebook pages, they said that CGH shouldn’t just blame everything on miscommunication and look at improving the quality of service that they give to their patients. Besides that, based on the statement released, some even question what if  “appropriate care” just means keeping the patient alive and show less concern. They also highlighted the lack of sincerity in the statement and said it’s merely a template reply.

 

Others pointed out that the statement did not address a lot of other issues that were brought up by Ms Lim like the attitude of the on-call doctor and nurses, as well as the unnecessary rude comments uttered by them. In addition, the statement also did not also reveal who is responsible and what steps had been taken to prevent this. Weng Hon Chan said that no one is taking responsibility, urging the head of CGH to do so.

A large number of them are calling the Ministry of Health (MOH) to step in and look into this matter to prevent similar cases from reoccurring.

On the other hand, many online users also commented on CGH’s Facebook page stating their personal experience while seeking treatment at the hospital. They highlighted the same issues raised by Ms Lim like rude staffs and overall poor services. To make things worse, Yang Mu Ming said that he experienced the same thing 10 years ago when his mother, grandmother and father were admitted, and sadly he said that the situation still remain the same even after a decade.

Netizen named Angela Teo wrote that just like Ms Lim’s grandmother, her grandmother’s health also quickly deteriorated after being warded at CGH for flu and cough. She added that she believed that her grandmother’s health went from bad to worse due to the bad care given to her. As such, she hopes that “CGH retrains their nurses and staff to provide in compassion and ensure proper care is duly given as bills up to 5 figures are paid for every patient’s stay”.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

93万户组屋将获 60元至100元水电费回扣

约93万户组屋即将在本月获得60元至100元的水电费回扣,以抵消他们部分的水电费。 水电费回扣,属于消费税补助券之一,每个三月发放一次,以此协助家庭抵消部分水电费,降低开支。 文告表示,将根据不同房型,获得不同价格的回扣,如一房式或两房式单位将获得100元水电费补助、三房式则会有90元补助,四房式则是80元,五房式则有70元,三代同堂或其他大型组屋则享有60元回扣。 若其房地产超过一个将无法享有水电费回扣。 日前,新加坡能源公司宣布,家庭电价将上调至3.5巴仙,即每千瓦0.81元。 举例而言,住在一房式的家庭,每月平均账单可增加1.02元,而五房式也可能会出现上涨3.20元的电费,形成最新电价自2014年以来,达到最高水平。 此外,城市煤气周一也宣布,今年第一季度,家庭天然气价格将调整至4.22巴仙,即每千瓦0.76元。 政府也推出水电费回扣(U-Save)协助民众抵消水电费。据报道,政府为水电费回扣拨出的总开支,今年预计达3亿元。 文告也指出,水电费回扣相当重要,至少能够帮助一房式或二房式单位的居民抵消平均三至四个月的水电费;而三房式和四房式的居民则可以抵消一至两个月的水电费。

调查显示 国人对国内生活成本最不满意

调查显示,本国人对政府最不满意的部分为国内生活成本,但对国家安全以及犯罪水平则是最满意的。 该调查是根据研究机构黑箱研究(Black Box Research)所进行的2019年11月份政府满意度指数(GSI)分析,于12月13日公布。 据调查显示,其中最让国人满意的国家安全与犯罪水平指数,达94巴仙至96巴仙的满意程度,即指国人能够安心地在土地上生活,不需要为治安问题忧虑。而最让国人不满意的则是国内生活水平,与上个月持相同水平,仅达57巴仙。 而整体的满意程度,自2019年1月以来,则维持在80分左右。 调查指出,自10月以来,政府的个别指项满意度调查均有所下降,例如国家安全、种族关系、环境、经济、政府问责、与人口管理。其中以经济的下滑幅度最为明显,而经济通常与国人的生活满意度挂钩。 生活品质与个人财务挂钩,半数人不满意目前生活状态 安盛保险公司日前就发表安盛更美好生活指数的调查指出,国人认为美好生活与个人财务的多寡有所相关,即指财务的多寡成就目标的实现。然而,调查却发现,仅41巴仙的新加坡人,对于目前的生活并不感到快乐,只有五成的人认为他们岁目前生活感到满足,即每两位中,就有一位对他们短期或长期目标的进度感到不满意。 这也意味着,一切阻碍目标实现的困难都与金钱相关,例如生活成本增加、无法储蓄。许多人认为,阻碍他们完成目标的最主要原因在于生活成本的增长,让他们无法实行储蓄习惯,而阻碍了目标的前进。 经常都会听财务专家的建议,指一个家庭内至少要有能够维持至少三个月的紧急基金,应对突如其来的意外或失业。然而,近乎半数的新加坡人却没有能够维持六个月以上的紧急基金,甚至高达两成的人都没有自觉紧急基金的重要性。 退休后生活仍被钱困扰,不尽如意…

港1208再号召大游行 港警长吁和平示威

香港在来临的12月8日国际人权日,以“守护香港,和你同行”为题号召游行,估计将会是场大规模的游行。因此香港警务处处长也在此敦促示威者能够和平示威。 据《路透社》报道,民间人权阵线昨日(5)于脸书宣布,游行已取得警方的不反对通知书,并强调这是7月21日以来首次游行获准,认为这是区议会选举、人权法案通过后,向国际社会表达香港人对抗警察暴力、争取民主决心的最大机会。 在前往北京进行礼节性访问前,新上任的警务处处长唐英年敦促香港人为全球树立更好的榜样。 他表示,“我希望我们的市民能够向全球展现,香港市民是能够有秩序、和平的进行游行,也敦促主办单位,协助警方维持秩序”,预计将在周日返港。 香港反送中示威持续六个月,从和平示威上升到警民暴力冲突,引起全球的关注。日前,美国联邦众议院一致通过《香港人权与民主法案》,授权美国总统每年审视香港自治情况,按需要调整美国对香港的贸易特别待遇。 香港于11月24日举行区议会选举,自1999年地方选举以来,民主派候选人首次取得压倒性胜利,在17席都取得过半议席,反观亲北京政府的建制派在有关选举可谓“全军覆没”。 针对暴力示威现象,唐英年表示,在过去两周内,香港获得了难得平静,也希望暴力就此停止。 尽管如此,上周五香港再次发起“勿忘初心大游行”仍爆发小规模的警民冲突,集会也被迫提前一小时结束。

Indian national says ripped flag image a piece of “art” and gives his side of story to CNA

Indian National Avijit Das Patnaik who was fired from DBS five months…