Taking a photo after an accident from Shutterstock.com

These days, it has become a common sight to see people quickly taking out their mobile phone to snap a picture or record a video of an incident before actually helping the victim.

Incidents like a brawl in Geylang involving 20 people or a woman’s leg caught in the gap between the platform and an MRT train were all caught on camera.

However, individuals behind these clips are curious onlookers who don’t do much to offer help to the victims.

Commuter Brandon Wong who assisted SMRT staff and consoled the woman whose leg got trapped in between the platform and the train at Buona Vista station last week said that most people were not doing much to help her. As such, Mr Wong said in his Facebook post that train commuters should come forward to offer assistance to those in need and sympathise with them, rather than simple “(standing) around taking photographs and videos”.

According to Rajan Supramaniam, managing director of Hilborne Law, photos and videos taken at a public incident can be submitted to a court of law as evidence, he said to The Straits Times (ST).

Although such videos can be sent to the court as evidence, police will still do their groundwork like taking statements from the accused, victims and witnesses, as well refer to other footages such as from police cameras or closed-circuit television cameras, Mr Rajan noted.

He added that the individual who captures video of an incident can be called up by the police as a witness. “While they may not have intended to report it or make the footage known to the police, they can still be called up if the authorities chance upon the footage online,” he explained.

A police spokesman also told ST that once a report is filed, the police will assess the facts and circumstances of each case and take necessary action where need, including reviewing all forms of proof – like social media post to find out if an offence has been committed.

Looking into this phenomena of onlookers filming the incident instead of taking action, experts said that it is symptomatic of the social media age.

In today’s society, the act of witnessing an incident is perceived to be equivalent to taking action, said Assistant Professor Liew Kai Khiun of Nanyang Technological University’s Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information. He also mentioned that filming such videos is probably safer for the witness than stepping into the limelight.

On the other hand, John Logan, programme director of addition rehabilition facility The Cabin, said that this could be possible because people are becoming more addicted in getting attention from others. “People have always looked and watched when accidents happen. But now what is happening is that people can get ‘likes’ and ‘hits’ on social media.”

After reading the consequences of recording a video at a public incident, many netizens question the need for them to be called up as witness by the police in the article’s comment section of ST’s Facebook page. They said that if this is made into a law, then people will just walk away and pretend they didn’t see anything if a crime happens. This is because people will be reluctant to be a witness, resulting to the victim losing any evidence that they may have to support them, and the police will take longer to investigate and solve the case.

 

However, others agreed and said that that the right thing to do in such a scenario is to actually help the victim. Some even suggested a law should be made to summon those who take videos as evidence ” as witness in pending matters before the courts”.

Facebook user Dino Dsuzair question why the police is troubling netizens’ who record videos, as these videos can actually help their investigation tremendously. Since the video takers are helping the police, he then wondered if they should be getting paid for their action?

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Stay for 30 months at address when applying for nearby school

Parents who wish to send their children to schools near their homes…

Technology is creating both new challenges and new opportunities for the financial crime compliance community, says Singapore regulator at ICA’s 2nd APAC Conference

The evolution of technology is enabling myriad capabilities for regulatory and financial…

时薪竟然高达1360元!? 面包店乌龙广告疯传

“在面包店工作,时薪竟然高达1360元,这可算是新加坡最高薪了吧,还等什么!?”此广告被网民在脸书等社交媒体上疯传,纷纷呼吁民众应聘,而面包店随后澄清只是摆乌龙了,并在脸书上帖文道歉。 该招聘广告于昨日(9月11日)开始在脸书上疯传,内容为一面包店招聘门市店员,工作时段分早班上午6时-下午2时,以及晚班下午2时-晚上10时,晚班和周末工作还有补贴,重点是时薪竟然高达1360元! 网友见到有此“好康”立刻分享到脸书上,至今已经有近500人做出反应,网民纷纷留言表示“有兴趣!”、“做三年就可以退休了。我就算加班也愿意。”。也有网民调侃道,“相信这份工作一定很有挑战性”、“没想到这件面包店赚这么多”。 相关面包店意识到有关乌龙事件后,于昨日傍晚时分杂志脸书上帖文道歉,指误把“每月”写成“每小时”,并且附上更正后的招聘广告。 新广告中注明了,招聘门市店员的月薪将依据工作时间而定,介于1500元至1900元之间,欢迎有兴趣者详谈。 此外,另有一则疑似乌龙广告今天也被分享到脸书上,帖文上写道,“若申请不到时薪1360元的面包店工作没关系,可以申请这个时薪5000元的发型师工作”。 有关帖文于今天下午4时许上载到脸书上,看到的网民都不禁莞尔一笑,调侃道“这个更好哦”。

102 new cases of COVID-19 infection in S’pore; 98 locally transmitted cases, 31 unlinked

As of Tuesday noon (3 Aug), the Ministry of Health (MOH) has…