Following the dismissal of professor Jeremy Fernando from his position at Tembusu College in the National University of Singapore (NUS) after complaints arose of his alleged sexual misconduct, former diplomat Tommy Koh offered to resign from his position as the college’s rector last Saturday (24 October).

Responding to a Facebook comment calling for his resignation in connection to the university’s handling of Dr Fernando’s dismissal, Prof Koh said that he would send in his resignation to NUS.

However, just two hours after his initial announcement, the veteran diplomat decided to backtrack on his decision.

At around 1pm on Saturday, he responded again to the same person who posted the original comment, stating: “I am afraid that most of the people do not agree with you. I will abide by their sentiment that I should not resign. Thank you for your suggestion anyway.”

Responding to a query from TODAY, Prof Koh also said on Saturday that he was “joking” when he said that he would offer to resign.

A week earlier (18 October), NUS revealed that it has sacked Dr Fernando, a lecturer who taught at Tembusu College in the university, following an internal investigation.

A spokesman of NUS was quoted in an article by TODAY stating that Dr Fernando was found to have “fallen short of the standards of professionalism that the university expects of a teaching staff”.

Although the university did not provide details of the complaints, a report by The Straits Times disclosed the details of what the lecturer allegedly did to the two undergraduate victims. Both of them did not want to be named.

Commenting on Dr Fernando’s dismissal, the victims said that they were disappointed with the lack of communication and statement of clarification from NUS to the students. They added that the university only did so after the issue surfaced on social media.

Following that, Prof Koh took to his Facebook to address the issue, especially on the university’s delay in informing the students about the incident.

“The delay in informing the students and faculty of the college was wrong because the students (have) a right to be informed about the dismissal of one of their teachers before learning about it from the mainstream and social media,” he wrote on Saturday, adding that the last few weeks have been “a very difficult time” for Tembusu College.

“At yesterday’s town hall meeting with the students and the press conference, we agreed that in future NUS would be open, transparent and share information with its stakeholders in a timely manner.”

If that’s not all, Prof Koh also told journalists last Friday that NUS had “fallen short” in handling the dismissal of Dr Fernando.

In the comment section of the post, a netizen then stated: “As rector, you should resign and take responsibility.”

To this, Prof Koh replied: “I will offer my resignation to NUS.”

Just hours later, the veteran diplomat retracted his move, and thanked the netizen for his “suggestion”.

Online users react

Upon learning about Prof Koh’s move to backtrack his decision to resign from NUS, many netizens supported him and stated that he should not have to resign.

Commenting on the Facebook pages of CNA and TODAY, they said that this incident is not his fault so he should not offer to resign. One user even said that his resignation will be a “great loss to the academia”.

Others applauded Prof Koh’s accountability and sensible nature as he took the bold step to resign from his position at the university.

One user said that this is “rare with public servant”.

Some commenters also pointed out that instead of the veteran diplomat, others on the Board of Directors are the one who should have offered to resign as they were the ones who took so long to inform the students about Dr Fernando’s dismissal.

On the other end, a number of netizens slammed Prof Koh for backtracking his decision to resign just hours after saying he would do so.

They wrote that Prof Koh should have kept to his words and not embarrass himself and ruin his own reputation by going against his own words.

Others opined that someone with a status like Prof Koh should have not said he was “joking” when he announced that he will leave his position.

Subscribe
Notify of
19 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

In the absence of evidence, PAP repeats use of sophistry to justify its beliefs to Singaporeans

On 28 March (Thursday), Finance Minister Heng Swee Keat made a statement…

Hong Kong protesters face crucial weekend test after airport setback

by Jerome TAYLOR / Elaine YU Hong Kong’s pro-democracy movement faces a…

早前六名前进党成员被记名 国家环境局:不罚款

日前,六名前进党成员于周日(21日)在拜访社区时,被指违反社交距离规定,被记下个人资料。 根据国家环境局的文告表示,目前已前进党取得联系,表示不会对前进党予以罚款,并建议前进党应遵守群聚应限五人一组,且走访社区时每组需遵守至少一米社交距离。 环境局也指出,随同报导的记者也应该遵守上述的安全措施规定。 周日他们一行人到武吉巴督31街第358组屋,拜访过程中,被一名安全距离大使,以及一名自称环境局官员的人士,记下他们的个资。被记名的前进党成员包括前进党准候选人袁麒钧。 此外,有关“官员”还声称,他们可以对罚款提出上诉。 那到底谁才能真正采取行动呢?根据《海峡时报》在四月份的一篇报道中提到,执法人员是除了警察以外,唯一可以采取执法行动的官员。 文章指出,“除了警察,执法人员是唯一可以采取执法行动的官员,他们可以对违反安全措施条例的公众予以罚款,而”大使“则旨在协助公众倡导和遵守安全措施。” 如此一来,国家环境局的官员是否被列为是执法人员之一? 其次,若当时违规的是人民行动党议员,是否也将予以同样的处理? 自阻断措施结束以来,人民行动党已跃跃欲试,该党议员也纷纷走进社区中,确实很有可能出现上述情况,值得一问的是,如果是人民行动党的成员,可能出现了违规行为,是否也会有相同的对待? 由此可见,前进党被记名一事揭示了一个问题:为何要在现在举行选举? 根据第二阶段的解封措施,获准举办五人以下的聚会,例如家庭内可迎接最多五名客人,也可以举办五人以下的在外聚会。…

需负担奖励顾客归还托盘费用 裕廊西小贩联署要求废除

裕廊西小贩中心12名小贩,提交一份联署诉求信,呼吁环境局指示该小贩中心运营商,废除由小贩承担的奖励顾客送还托盘措施。 顾客每自行归还一个餐盘,可获得两角钱的奖励;但是这笔费用却要由小贩们承担。有感于每个月多出数百元增加负担,这12名小贩致函环境局,也把诉求信提呈给裕廊西小贩中心的运营商,口福集团子公司Hawker Management。 根据《今日报》报导,这些小贩是在今年8月作出上述申诉。小贩们称,打从裕廊西小贩中心在去年开张以来,只有该小贩中心奖励顾客,在用餐后归还托盘。 其中一名小贩透露,除了每月约两千元的租金和其他附加费用,承担奖励顾客归还托盘的开销,每月累积下来,有时可高达900元。 其余附加费用还包括1100元的清洁和收碗盘费、250元的服务费和300元的自动现钱机费用,致使小贩每月开销加上租金可高达4千元。 其中一名40岁不愿具名小贩表示,为此他们也曾于顾客争议,例如假设食物分量用一个托盘就可装完,顾客却拿了三个托盘,就必须给顾客6角钱的奖励。如果生意较好时,这种成本还会增加。 也有小贩反映,随着近几个月客流量减少,回归托盘的费用也侵蚀了小贩们的盈利。在生意难以为继的情况下,一些小贩选择转移经营地点。 至于环境局发言人称,有收到部分小贩的反映,但认为他们在和Hawker Management签署租赁合约时,理应注意到有关的收费条款。 另一方面,Hawker Management…