On 22 March (Friday), a taxi driver lost consciousness while driving and ploughed into pedestrians in Alexandra Road, resulting in the death of a 66-year-old woman.

The 72-year-old SMRT taxi driver hit the elderly woman and another 32-year-old lady at about 7pm last Friday. While the younger woman has reportedly recovered, the 66-year-old succumbed to her injuries and died in the hospital at around 9pm on the same day.

The elderly woman – who works as a cleaner – was a loving mother and wife, and would show her love in her own quiet way.

Her younger daughter, Ms Lim, said that her father is badly affected by the woman’s death. Ms Lim, who refused to give out her full name and wanted her mother to be known as Madam Teng, expressed that her mother’s death has left the entire family “heartbroken”, especially her 64-year-old father.

Speaking to The Straits Times (ST) at her mother’s wake last night (24 March), Ms Lim said that her father would quietly go to the side and cry whenever he sees his wife’s body at the wake.

“We’re all very devastated,” said Ms Lim, adding that the family wants to know how the accident took place.

According to Ms Lim, ever since the accident occurred, they have not heard from SMRT, and found it unbelievable that no representatives from the transport company have contacted them yet.

The family has been watching videos that have been circulating on social media, trying to comprehend what exactly happened.

“I can’t accept it. The whole accident seems so dramatic. I want to know how the investigation is going on,” said Ms Lim, hoping that she would be able to get hold of the video of the accident from the taxi driver’s in-car camera.

ST contacted SMRT for queries and the firm’s vice-president of corporate communications, Margaret Teo responded and said, “We have reached out to the family of the deceased on Sunday night. Our priority is their well-being and we shall render all necessary support during this difficult time.”

Based on a report by Shin Ming Daily, the circulated video shows that passengers in the taxi turned on the hazard light and wind down the car’s window to warn other motorists, right before the accident.

It appears that there were three passengers on board – one in the front seat while the other two were seated at the back. When the driver became unconscious, the passenger in the front seat tried to control the steering.

However, the reason why the taxi suddenly accelerated remains unknown. It probably could be because the 72-year-old man’s leg was still placed on the accelerator, said Shin Ming Daily.

On social media, netizens were deeply saddened by this news and offered their condolences to the Madam Teng’s family. However, a lot of them questioned how the taxi could steer from left to right if the taxi driver lost consciousness. Some even requested that the driver is properly investigated, while others want him to be sued and not be conned by his excuses.

They wrote their comments in ST’s Facebook page where over 170 comments were received.

But, some people felt sorry for the 72-year-old and questioned why such an old individual is working at such an age. They said he should be resting at home enjoying his retirement fund. They blamed the Government for forcing old people to work at such an old age in order to survive.

Facebook user Vono Seekeh said that even he pushed himself to work when he was unwell. But he realised that pushing himself resulted in accidents which made things worse. However, he understand why most retirees want to work because they want to avoid the sense of “uselessness, no sense of purpose, loneliness and depression”.

Other bunch of netizens said that it was “unbelievable” that SMRT took two days to respond to the deceased family.

 

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

CCCS issues Infringement Decision against the exchange of commercially sensitive information between competing hotels

An Infringement Decision (“ID”) against the owners or operators of Capri by Fraser…

RP rally: A little bit of everything

by Rachel Chan What could Singaporeans expect from the opposition party founded…

S$211 million in CPF money left unclaimed over the last six years; will more CPF members die before spending their hard-earned monies?

A total of S$211 million has been left unclaimed with the Insolvency…

公积金局指经过三医生评估 认为沈佳泉仍可从事非体力劳动工作

此前,本社报导56岁的公民沈佳泉,基于心脏衰竭无法长时间工作,家中开支由妻子一力承担,且为了治疗用途,手上积蓄也所剩无几。故此沈佳泉希望能申请领出公积金,协助减轻家中负担。 沈佳泉以医疗理由提出申请,不过根据誌期8月29日的公积金局回函,指经过医生鉴定,认为他“并非丧失身体能力至无法工作”,因此无法受理他申请领出公积金的申请。他的公积金积蓄目前约有1万8千余元。 对此,公积金局也在昨日(22日)特别于官方脸书发文,指出沈佳泉的医生进行了两次个别的评估,认为他仍能就业,且适合一些不需要体力劳动的工作。 此外,当局称还找了两位医生评估沈佳泉的情况,也得出上述医生的结论,故此不符合以医疗理由领出公积金的条件。 不过,该局称国家心脏中心将和沈佳泉联系,如有必要可为他的医疗账单提供经济援助,同时也有社区伙伴在协助他。当局表示将与相关机构协助沈佳泉。 有关公积金局脸书贴文如下: 根据公积金局官网指出,公民只有在四种情况下,能透过医疗理由申请提取公积金,即申请者因为丧失身体或心智能力、或寿命严重受损、或永久性缺乏能力、获得了绝症,而无法工作。 此前,沈佳泉显示接受本社采访,指出自己在2014年开始身体出状况,经过医生检查发现心脏出现衰竭现象,动手术后,心脏功能仅余37巴仙, 且不能提重物,否则心脏会痛。“医生要我把一切都放慢下来,不能做太激烈的运动。” 他在手术的两年后,重新开始工作,也尝试了开私召车等兼职工作,但是因为心脏问题,也无法赚取过多收入。在2017年已停止工作。 仅靠妻子工作收入 经济拮据…