The Court of Appeal on Wednesday (Mar 6) increased the term of suspension for a negligent Malaysian doctor, Dr Mohd Syamsul Alam Ismail, whose patient later suffered gangrene and had to have part of his scrotum removed.

After an appeal by the Singapore Medical Council (SMC) to lengthen the original three-month suspension, the Court of Appeal raised the term by 10 times to two-and-a-half years. The Malaysian doctor was also fined $40,000.

However, Dr Syamsul did not bother to appear in court. He has already gone back to Malaysia and is currently practising in Johor.

Didn’t bother to examine patient

The case started in 2013, when Dr Syamsul was working at a medical centre in a shipyard in Singapore. On 14 May 2013, he saw a patient who complained about a lump at his buttock and a fever that he had suffered for five days. He also told Dr Syamsul that he was diabetic.

The patient complained that Dr Syamsul failed to conduct a physical examination of his lump, and did not ask him to remove his clothes or lie down on the clinic bed to be examined. Instead, Dr Syamsul just prescribed him antibiotics and other medication before signing a MC for him. Unfortunately, the patient’s condition worsened and was warded in hospital the next day. He was diagnosed with gangrene and had to undergo immediate surgery, which had part of his scrotum removed.

Eventually, the patient lodged a complaint against the Malaysian doctor in 2014. SMC then proceeded to investigate the matter. By 2017, Dr Syamsul became uncontactable despite attempts to contact him by telephone, e-mail and letter. But in October 2017, he e-mailed the SMC asking if he could continue working in Singapore. He said he did not intend to take part in his disciplinary hearing.

SMC proceeded with the tribunal hearing nonetheless and Dr Syamsul was found guilty of failing to undertake adequate clinical evaluation of his patient as well as failing to keep clear and accurate records. The tribunal said Dr Syamsul should have referred the patient to a hospital immediately given the patient’s symptoms and diabetic condition. The tribunal imposed a three-month suspension and a $40,000 fine. Later, SMC appealed to the High Court for a longer suspension against Dr Syamsul.

CJ: Blatant lack of remorse

“This was serious negligence,” said CJ Menon at the proceeding in the Court of Appeal. “Dr Syamsul had failed to perform basic and elementary things that any competent doctor ought to have done.” Also, his blatant lack of remorse was seriously aggravating, said CJ, noting his lack of communications with the SMC and his refusal to participate in his earlier tribunal hearing, as well as the Court of Appeal’s proceedings.

“So far as we can tell, he is no longer practising in Singapore. He has only been contactable by email, but he has replied only intermittently to the SMC and SMC’s counsel whenever they attempted to contact him for the purposes of informing him of the disciplinary proceedings,” the CJ noted. “Even when he deigned to reply, it was evident that he was fixated more on when he would be able to return to Singapore to work rather than to express remorse or in any way to attempt to justify his conduct. This blatant lack of remorse is seriously aggravating.”

CJ Menon said the court maintained the $40,000 fine to send a signal to errant doctors who are able to practise overseas that they cannot simply avoid punishment by waiting out the period of suspension. In addition, Dr Syamsul has to bear the legal costs of the SMC, which were fixed at $25,000 including disbursements. The court also directed the SMC to inform their Malaysian counterparts of the orders it made, as Dr Syamsul is presently still registered to practise in Malaysia.

Indeed, a check on the website of the Malaysian Medical Council shows that he is currently registered to practise back in Malaysia at a clinic in Taman Desa Cemerlang, Johor.

Subscribe
Notify of
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Experts divided on the need for SGSecure to include civilian self-defence during terror attacks

Following the terrorist attacks at the Al Noor and Linwood Mosques in…

South Asian family who infected airport worker didn’t arrive from India; But did they come from India via Nepal?

In a Straits Times report about a joint statement from the Transport, Foreign…

抗议警方滥暴 香港医护界发起“罢工不罢医”游行

香港反送中风波持续进行,截至今日已有两个多月,从上街游行到各种罢工罢课活动。 继9月2日,公立医院发起静坐,支持三罢行动及抗议警方滥暴,昨日(3日)九龙医院发起“罢工不罢医”静坐及游行,由九龙医院西翼游行至医管局大楼。 此外,周一(2日)医护界亦发起集会,抗议警方滥权滥暴力,及促请医管局捍卫专业及病人权益。 其中包括玛丽医院、韦尔斯亲王医院、屯门医院、等数十家医院,分别于中午在各医院起举行静坐集会。 据港媒《东方日报》报道,此次游行约200名九龙医院医护人员参与,他们均牺牲中午吃饭时间,沿途手持诉求单及高呼“医护同行,保护市民,没有暴徒,只有暴政”等口号。 此次游行是为了抗议警方过度使用暴力镇压,其参与游行的医护人员直言,因看不过港警权力过大,将示威者甚至无辜市民打至重伤而出来发声,亦有护士指出看见831太子站发生警察阻碍救援事件,在业界引起很大的回响,伤者延迟了2小时半才接受治疗。 此外,护士也曾听同事指警方要求要有警员在现场才能接受治疗,因此无法苟同警方的行为,选择站出来抗议。至于是否会担心秋后算账,她强调并不会自己的政治立场而影响对病人的专业服务,表明“已经站出来了就不会害怕”。 而站出来游行的不仅仅是护士,当中也有许多医生随行。医生在受访时表示,对市民被警方打至重伤感到十分心痛,同时也看到警方在记者会上的辩解,担心继续下去,只会壮大警权。 另外也有参与者指出,针对警方于医院行使过大的权力非常不满,因此需要出来发声。 对警镇暴行动表示不满,医界不断站出来发声 香港医界已不是第一次针对示威运动发声,上月3日,香港玛丽医院医生发起「罢工不罢医」行动,声援各界三罢及728在上环衝突中被捕的护士陈永琪。 陈永琪当天在上环冲突中只是负责人道救援工作,随后却遭起诉暴动罪,尔后有人发起联署谴责香港政府罔顾人道精神、缺乏人伦道德,认为救死扶伤是医护人员的天职,不论是前线的示威者、警务人员,甚至黑社会,医护人员也会一视同仁,…

Empathy and adaptability – Important future skills Singaporeans are lacking in

by Robin Low With technology advancing rapidly, there are always people who…