The Court of Appeal on Wednesday (Mar 6) increased the term of suspension for a negligent Malaysian doctor, Dr Mohd Syamsul Alam Ismail, whose patient later suffered gangrene and had to have part of his scrotum removed.

After an appeal by the Singapore Medical Council (SMC) to lengthen the original three-month suspension, the Court of Appeal raised the term by 10 times to two-and-a-half years. The Malaysian doctor was also fined $40,000.

However, Dr Syamsul did not bother to appear in court. He has already gone back to Malaysia and is currently practising in Johor.

Didn’t bother to examine patient

The case started in 2013, when Dr Syamsul was working at a medical centre in a shipyard in Singapore. On 14 May 2013, he saw a patient who complained about a lump at his buttock and a fever that he had suffered for five days. He also told Dr Syamsul that he was diabetic.

The patient complained that Dr Syamsul failed to conduct a physical examination of his lump, and did not ask him to remove his clothes or lie down on the clinic bed to be examined. Instead, Dr Syamsul just prescribed him antibiotics and other medication before signing a MC for him. Unfortunately, the patient’s condition worsened and was warded in hospital the next day. He was diagnosed with gangrene and had to undergo immediate surgery, which had part of his scrotum removed.

Eventually, the patient lodged a complaint against the Malaysian doctor in 2014. SMC then proceeded to investigate the matter. By 2017, Dr Syamsul became uncontactable despite attempts to contact him by telephone, e-mail and letter. But in October 2017, he e-mailed the SMC asking if he could continue working in Singapore. He said he did not intend to take part in his disciplinary hearing.

SMC proceeded with the tribunal hearing nonetheless and Dr Syamsul was found guilty of failing to undertake adequate clinical evaluation of his patient as well as failing to keep clear and accurate records. The tribunal said Dr Syamsul should have referred the patient to a hospital immediately given the patient’s symptoms and diabetic condition. The tribunal imposed a three-month suspension and a $40,000 fine. Later, SMC appealed to the High Court for a longer suspension against Dr Syamsul.

CJ: Blatant lack of remorse

“This was serious negligence,” said CJ Menon at the proceeding in the Court of Appeal. “Dr Syamsul had failed to perform basic and elementary things that any competent doctor ought to have done.” Also, his blatant lack of remorse was seriously aggravating, said CJ, noting his lack of communications with the SMC and his refusal to participate in his earlier tribunal hearing, as well as the Court of Appeal’s proceedings.

“So far as we can tell, he is no longer practising in Singapore. He has only been contactable by email, but he has replied only intermittently to the SMC and SMC’s counsel whenever they attempted to contact him for the purposes of informing him of the disciplinary proceedings,” the CJ noted. “Even when he deigned to reply, it was evident that he was fixated more on when he would be able to return to Singapore to work rather than to express remorse or in any way to attempt to justify his conduct. This blatant lack of remorse is seriously aggravating.”

CJ Menon said the court maintained the $40,000 fine to send a signal to errant doctors who are able to practise overseas that they cannot simply avoid punishment by waiting out the period of suspension. In addition, Dr Syamsul has to bear the legal costs of the SMC, which were fixed at $25,000 including disbursements. The court also directed the SMC to inform their Malaysian counterparts of the orders it made, as Dr Syamsul is presently still registered to practise in Malaysia.

Indeed, a check on the website of the Malaysian Medical Council shows that he is currently registered to practise back in Malaysia at a clinic in Taman Desa Cemerlang, Johor.

Subscribe
Notify of
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

公园局称呼建屋局是“产业主” 有权增公共组屋额外规定

前日,英语媒体《今日报》刊载, 一名私人补习老师为捍卫自己在五房式组屋单位内养鸡的权益,和建屋发展局杠上的报导。 据报导,48岁的Eric Woo是一名养鸡爱好者,在家里养了五只鸡,它们分别关在两个笼子里,偶尔才让它们出来在家中走动。他也透过鸡只教育学生有关繁殖和生命周期的知识。 不过,在今年5月,相信是遭人告密,建屋局官员找上门,告诉他当局不准住户在政府组屋里饲养鸡只。 因为担心当局将没收他的宠物鸡,Eric Woo赶紧将五只鸡移到别处,为刚刚孵出的两只小鸡找新主人。 Eric Woo对此感到不满,因为无论他找不到建屋局有规定,不准进行非商业性饲养家禽。 而建屋局回复《今日报》的询问时,坚定表明住户不能在组屋单位养鸡只等的家禽,若允许他们到处走动,也会对邻居造成不便。 不过,Eric Woo相信法律是站在他那一边的。他引述野生动物和鸟类法,表示民众可以在“任何场所内”饲养不超过10只鸟类。…

Reform Party’s Kenneth Jeyaretnam questions “minority certificate” and wonders about “three-cornered fights” on Nomination Day

Reform Party’s secretary-general Kenneth Jeyaretnam took to Facebook at 9am to share…

Cryptocurrency surges as Musk changes Twitter logo to ‘meme dog’

Elon Musk changed the Twitter logo to a Shiba Inu dog associated with the meme-inspired cryptocurrency, Dogecoin, causing the price to surge over 20%. Despite being sued for promoting the volatile coin, Musk has used his 133 million followers to promote himself and humorously pump up the value of the cryptocurrency.

【冠状病毒19】皇冠假日酒店现两例确诊 即日起关闭14天

本地周四(7日)新增两例社区病例,包括一名43岁持有工作准证的马来西亚籍女子确诊,她在樟宜机场皇冠假日酒店的Azur 餐馆工作,这也是自周三(6日)24岁韩籍男子确诊后,再有一名机场皇冠假日酒店Azur餐厅员工确诊。 根据卫生部的文告,确诊女员工职务包括为机组人员和酒店客人送餐,食物已预前包装好,而他和餐厅的客人没有接触。 她在本月3日出现症状,5日前往诊所求医并接受冠病检测,隔天确诊感染,随后被送往国家传染病中心接受治疗。 而她的血清检测则呈阴性,因此很可能是近期感染病毒。她也在12月31日曾接受常规检测(RRT)呈阴性,初步检测显示可能没有感染B117毒株。 由于皇冠假日酒店传出两例确诊病例,因此卫生部也对病例展开调查。初步调查显示,当局不排除出现内部感染的可能。 对此,皇冠假日酒店即本周五(8日)起,至21日暂时关闭,酒店设施和宴会厅也将会关闭。 而酒店已停止接受新房客,现有的酒店房客和外国机组人员也会被安排退房,来临入住的机组人员也将会转移至另一制定设施。 酒店在关闭期间将会进行深度清洁和消毒,卫生部也会安排所有酒店职员接受冠病检测。 除了上述病例,本地昨日也出现一社区病例,该病例为63岁本地男子,目前是在Dnata机场货运中心,担任货仓操作员,负责为印尼航空公司My Indo处理上货和卸货的工作,与乘客未有接触。 他在本月4日出现急性呼吸道感染(ARI)的症状,6日前往樟宜综合医院,当天便确诊感染入院治疗。…