Source: Google map screengrab.

A TOC article (‘F&B group founded by award winning entrepreneur, caught for deceiving MOM‘) about an award-winning boss whose company was caught for falsely declaring foreign workers’ salaries to deceive the Manpower Ministry, triggered a number of responses from netizens.

Many said that this is just the tip of the iceberg and that the practice is fairly widespread in the industry. Many SMEs would try to declare a higher salary for their foreign work applicants so that they could qualify for S-Pass or Employment Pass to work in Singapore. But in reality, they are being paid much lower.

According to information on MOM’s website, criteria for S-Pass include a minimum salary of $2,300 ($2,400 by Jan 2020) while those for Employment Pass include a minimum salary of $3,600. Both require applicants to have “acceptable qualifications”. After getting their work pass approvals, the foreign workers would be paid less than the statutory minimum. They have to return the excess salary back to their boss, usually in the form of cash. Such practices are, of course, illegal.

To illustrate how rampant such illegal practices were, one netizen pointed to the many job postings in Chinese, posted on the Lion City Forum (www.sgcn.com) – an online forum set up for PRCs working and living in Singapore.

He pointed to job ads seeking S-Pass foreign workers but would only pay a monthly salary of $1,700. The worker can choose either a rental allowance of $250 per month (the market rental rate for bunk beds) or free stay at the residence provided by the employer.

So, at $1,700, the worker will have to pay back the employer $600 ($2,300 – $1,700) a month. Some employers may use this as an excuse to charge their workers for meals provided.

“There are many such similar recruitment ads where the monthly salaries do not meet the minimum EP/S-Pass criteria, posted by recruitment agents in China, as requested by Singapore’s recruitment agents… And the best is: MOM is keeping extremely quiet about all these,” the netizen lamented.

Many ads with advertised basic salaries lower than work pass requirements

Indeed, a quick check on Lion City Forum shows that many job ads did sound very dubious. For example, a person, presumably a recruitment agent, who goes by the moniker TINGTING0309 posted a number of job ads not too long ago:

Translation:

5. SP waiter/waitress working in air-conditioned restaurant. Below 35. Basic salary $1,400 with $250 housing allowance. Meals included. Working 12 hours a day with 2 rest days per month. Experience required. Mainly to do various odd jobs.

6. SP Hunan chef. Below 35. Basic salary $1,600 with $250 housing allowance. Meals included. Working 12 hours a day with 2 rest days per month. 2 years experience required. Restaurant is air-conditioned.

7. SP Northeast cuisine chef in air-conditioned restaurant. Below 35. Basic salary $1,700. After 3 months of probation, salary increased to $1,800. Housing allowance $200. Meals included. Working 12 hours a day with 2 rest days per month. Overtime $5 per hour. Need to be independent.

Translation:

SP male or female. An F&B group in Singapore looking for office executives in its HQ. Position: Management Trainee. After 3 months training, can be promoted to Assistant Manager. Job responsibility: Assist in basic accounting and HR matters, and assist General Manager on management matters of different outlets.

Company has more than 10 outlets with more than 100 employees. It has more than 10 years of operating history and it is rapidly expanding SME. Company is currently looking for young and potential people to be trained as management staff so as to help expedite company’s growth.

Language: English (for daily communication and typing) and Chinese.
Education: Degree/Diploma.
Experience: Advantages to have experience in accounting and HR.
Other requirements: motivated, with leadership ability, patience and perseverance, sincere, honest and prudent with logical thinking ability.
Salary: $1,400 during 3-month training, thereafter can increase to $1,600.
Housing allowance: $200.
Working hours: 9 to 6.30pm (6 days). Sunday rest.
Overtime: depend on need (no overtime pay).
Benefits: insurance, medical, bonuses (depend on performance).
Others: Because working in HQ, chances to get pay increments and bonuses higher if performance is good. And if performance is good, can get pay increments every year. Age: 35 below. Address: Bukit Batok.

Obviously, with heavy salary undercutting by unscrupulous companies as well as foreign workers, it can only make lives more difficult for Singaporean workers looking for jobs in their own country.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

“学校可以是安全的地方” 总理解释为何迄今未停课

尽管本地出现凤山Sparkletots幼园感染群,多达15教职员和五名校长家属感染,不过总理李显龙解释为何未作出关闭学校、停课的原因。 李显龙今日于总统府接受本地媒体访问。总理提及,有许多人问,为何疫情当下不关闭学校? 目前,包括日本、香港等地都已宣布停课。 对此他解释,学校可以是安全的地方,且学校提供很重要的服务予学生家长,“如果不开课,不代表(疫情)问题解决,但是学生要如何安顿?” 他指出,那些有家长或大人照顾的孩子,或许会“乖乖”待在家做作业,但是家里没有大人可能就溜出去溜达、到电玩中心、去商场等,更有感染的风险。 他强调政府仍密切监督情况,“尽管我们有凤山Sparkletots幼园感染群,但多数是教职员,多佛国际学校感染群也是教职员。” “应作个别单位看待” 对此,总理认为就如同对待工作场所,应把学校作为个别单位,而不是整体来看待。例如有工作场所出现感染群则重点对应处理,而不是关闭掉整个体系。 早前,一些家长对疫情进展感到担忧,有者也发起网络请愿,要求教育部继续延长关闭学校的期限。 对此教育部长王乙康曾解释,多数年轻患者都是因为家里或学校以外的缘故被感染。 他也引述新加坡国立大学医学部主任、世卫组织全球疫情和警报响应网络主席费舍尔(Dale Fisher)的说法,学生如今能够上学可能会更安全,因为他们会与同侪一起相处而不是与到其他社区闲晃,增加感染机率。…

【冠状病毒19】测试盒校准出问题 33人被误列为确诊

根据卫生部文告,卫生部对实验室测试进行定期检查,最近却发现因为其中一套测试盒出现校准问题,有33人被误列为对冠状病毒19 呈阳性反应。 国家公共卫生实验室再次为他们进行检测,确认上述33人都对冠病呈阴性。 卫生部也表示,当局已立即采取行动纠正问题,有关实验室也暂停检测工作,以解决问题。 不过,当局也表示审查也未发现有出现误判为阴性的测试结果。 另一方面,有鉴于有两名病患的检测结果模棱两可,当局暂时把他们 列为”阳性“并隔离。不过较后进行重新检测,已确认他们都对冠病呈阴性反应。 上述两名病例,分别是博览中心隔离设施服务的20岁男护士,以及52岁女义工。

Law Society of Singapore: M Ravi ordered to stop legal practice

The Law Society of Singapore has ordered Human Rights lawyer, M Ravi to stop his legal practice until he goes for a medical examination.

Singapore Medical Council overcharged Susan Lim: Courts

High Court ruled that the legal bills sought by the Singapore Medical…