A recent video of a short speech by Dr Tan Cheng Bock has been circulating on social media.

In the video, he had expressed his wish to re-enter parliament because he wants to seek accountability and transparency over the reserves and the Central Provident Fund (CPF) from the government.

“I go in because I want accountability. I want transparency. What’s happening to our reserves? Are our reserves all gone? Don’t know. What happened to our CPF?” Dr Tan asked.

“Now these things, we all can shout until the cows come home [but it’s] no use, if you’re not in the House.”

Always putting Singaporeans first

Dr Tan was with the PAP in his early years of politics. Despite being a backbencher, he fought hard for Singaporeans.

In 1999, when Singapore was just beginning to recover from the 1997 Asian financial crisis, the PAP government pushed for a stronger intake of foreign talents to work in Singapore. Dr Tan gave a speech in Parliament calling the government to think of our own Singaporeans first (“‘Let’s think of our own first’ call“, ST 9 Mar 1999).

Dr Tan urged the government to tone down repeated calls on the need to attract foreign talents and to put Singaporeans’ interests first. He wanted the government to reassure Singaporeans that they would come first in Governments plans. However, Dr Tan was strongly rebutted by then Minister of Trade and Industry George Yeo and even earned a stern rebuke from Senior Minister Lee Kuan Yew.

He was also instrumental in convincing the Ministry of National Development to allow Singaporeans to park their cars for free in Housing Development Board (HDB) estates on Sundays and public holidays, so as to promote family togetherness.

Even though Dr Tan was a member of PAP, by no means he would support the party blindly. This can be seen during the debate on the Nominated Member of Parliament Scheme, which was introduced by the PAP government to allow for the appointment of non-elected MPs to provide supposedly, alternative nonpartisan views in the House.

The NMPs are shortlisted by a Special Select Committee of Parliament from a list of candidates nominated by the public. In reality, the PAP government is hoping that with the scheme, the NMPs would supposedly give alternative views in Parliament and thereby, reducing the need for Singaporeans to vote for more opposition MPs.

Dr Tan Cheng Bock was vehemently against the NMP scheme on grounds that MPs have to be elected by the people and be accountable to the electorate. He spoke up strongly against the scheme and voted against it in June 1997 and April 2002.

Forming a new party

In any case, Dr Tan and 11 other “like-minded Singaporeans” have filed an application with the Registry of Societies last month to register a new political party, called the Progress Singapore Party.

He revealed that he decided to re-enter politics due to a sense of duty he felt towards Singapore, upon hearing the concerns and fears of Singaporeans.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Yong Vui Kong Petitions President S R Nathan for clemency

by: Kirsten Han additional reporting by: Azhar Jalil/ Lawyers representing convicted drug…

《海时》:民调指过半年长员工想继续全职工作 果真如此?

今日,本地英语媒体《海峡时报》刊载了颇具误导性的标题,指“过半年长员工想继续全职工作”。 不过,内文指出,这是参与乐活乐学中心(Centre for Seniors)的400多位年长员工,有约四分之一反映想继续留在目前工作;此外有300年长者,有过半表示想继续在全职岗位工作。 当然我们知道,根据300人作出的民意调查,并无法完全代表全国乐龄人口的意见。 该中心响应总理李显龙此前在国庆群众大会宣布、调高退休和重新雇佣年龄的倡议,认为需要有更多措施来协助年长雇员规划他们的职涯。 据报导,教育部兼人力部高级政务次长刘燕玲,在前日参观该中心。她在受访时呼吁雇主和雇员沟通,或安排雇员参加课程、了解他们对未来的期待和展望,协助他们更好规划职业转型和退休生活。 报导指乐活乐学中心自2016年,就推出LifeWork培训项目,专协助50岁以上者过渡退休生活;中心也协助年长者找工作。 不过,一直以来主流媒体和执政政府在乐龄课题上一直都搞错重点。例如《海时》企图断章取义,根据300人的民调就藉此断言,过半年长员工想继续做全职工作,而总理等内阁成员,一再迷信必须调高退休年龄,让有意继续工作的年长者,确保他们有足够的收入过活。 什么原因促使年长者必须继续工作? 然而,为何总理等部长、主流媒体,从不探讨,是什么促使年长者继续工作?是因为他们想打发时间? 即使过去已有许多研究呈现民调数据、公民组织和民间积极发表意见,但遗憾的是执政者只选择相信他们想听的话,并没有正视生活成本、公积金积蓄不足、需要有收入等,才是促使年长者必须持续工作的原因。…

Tour guide voices concern on the future of his profession

Logan Munusamy, a tour guide in Singapore, posted his concern on the…