Photo Credit: Singapore National Eye Centre

The Singapore National Eye Centre (SNEC) has promised to review and make adjustments to its charges periodically for complex procedures, days after the media revealed that MediShield Life only paid S$4.50 for an elderly man’s S$4, 477 post-subsidy bill.

The elderly, Mr Seow Ban Yam received a bill that amounted to over S$12,000 for his cataract operation on both eyes at SNEC. After government subsidies, the bill came up to S$4,477 and the elderly man paid S$3000 of that out of his Medisave account.

Mr Seow had an impression that MediShield Life would cover 90 per cent of the remaining S$1,477. To his shock, the national insurance only paid out S$4.50 after it said that it imposes a S$2,800 cap on the procedure he underwent.

This means that the maximum reimbursement for such a procedure each year is S$2800 + plus actual ward fees of S$205. This totals to S$3,005 and out of this amount, S$3,000 has to be taken from patient’s own CPF funds. This leaves only S$5 that is claimable by insurance. Hence, MediShield Life paid 90 per cent of that S$5 – amounting to a paltry S$4.50.

Post this fiasco, SNEC said it will cut its charges to strike a balance between cost recovery and patient affordability. The cost for most common procedures, such as cataract and glaucoma surgery, are closely monitored to ensure patients can pay with Medisave and make minimal cash outlay.

SNEC’s Chief Operating Officer, Ms Charity Wai, said that as a tertiary referral centre, uncommon but complex cases, with high risk of complications, would need the expertise of senior and experienced surgeons.

In fact, such surgery requires longer operating time. For Mr Seow’s case, a duct drainage operation was required for both eyes and the surgery took three hours, Ms Wai explained.

She added, “Duct drainage surgery is not common. Of the 42,000 procedures SNEC performed in 2017, there were only seven such cases.”

As such, SNEC recognises that it could do more often cost reviews to close the prevailing gaps between cost burden of patients and what it charges for the hospital to survive financially.

“With the latest review of SNEC’s charges to better align a wider range of procedures with Medisave and MediShield claim limits, patients requiring complex operations of higher surgical table codes will see reduced charges, including that which Mr Seow underwent,” she explained.

The new fee revisions will be introduced from 1 March.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

2020全球竞争力报告 新加坡居首

瑞士洛桑管理学院(IMD)发布2020年全球竞争力报告,指新加坡成功蝉联,其次为是丹麦、瑞士及荷兰。 报告指我国有稳健国际贸易与投资;加之就业和人力市场政策、教育制度、科技基础设施、高科技出口等都发挥作用,取得良好经济表现。 亚洲经济体方面,香港居第五(去年第二)、台湾第11、中国从第14滑落至20,以及韩国第23。 全球竞争力报告,综合各国企业管理层今年首季对各国经济观察,以及各国去年的各种实际数据。

Indomitable Chiam See Tong: My improbable hero

by: Dr Huang Shoou Chyuan/ Introduction I have often been unkind to…

Public should not jump into conclusion on corruption investigation of PAP town council GM like what some speculators did

Workers’ Party has issued a statement, calling for the public not to…

陈振声驳斥 CECA没给印度国民移民我国“开方便之门”

新加坡贸工部长陈振声指出,新加坡-印度全面经济合作协定(Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreement,简称CECA)并没有授予印度国民无条件进入我国,或成为我国移民的特权。 他于周末(9日)指出,“有关双边协议为国人带来了就业机会,旨在减轻经济不稳定时民众的担忧”。 在社媒和网上流传的一个说法,指CECA允许印度国民夺走我国专业人员、经理、高管和技术人员(简称PMET)的就职机会。 陈振声指出,和其他国家或地区的专才一样,印度专才也必须符合我国人力部的资格标准,才能到我国工作,或申请就业准证、S准证等。 他表示,我国自由贸易协定网络自2005年以来,已经增加了40万份就业机会,达到125万个,但是他并没有声明有关就业机会中,有多少是因为CECA而获得,也没有指出国人从中受益多少。 “我们了解且明白国人在目前的不稳定经济环境下,产生了对竞争力和就业前景的担忧。但是误导国人并不能帮助到他们,只会制造恐慌和愤怒。” “要帮助国人,首先我们要扩大企业市场,持续培训我国员工,以保持优势的竞争力。并且不让他人煽动我国的种族主义可人民恐惧,更不该因为个人私心或政治理由而如此做。” CECA放宽外劳工作证条例 然而,自CECA合约在2005年生效以来,我国在发放工作准证给印度籍员工方面都比较宽松。在CECA条约下,两国人民可以进行的事项包括了:…