Not too long ago we talked about a petition that was started by an advocacy group called the Family Justice Reform Singapore for a change in Singapore’s family justice system.

Part of the petition includes a call for the government to undertake a review of the Republic’s family justice framework to ensure that it protects the interest and welfare of families in Singapore, and deliver positive outcomes for children and families caught in divorce.

One such father who had signed the petition, reached out to TOC with his own personal struggle with this issue.

Maxim K, a 33-year old man from Russia had a child with a Singaporean lady. Unfortunately, according to the father, the relationship went sour before their daughter was born and the Singaporean lady refused to include Maxim’s name in their daughter’s birth certificate. This has left the father with many problems when trying to see his daughter and maintain a relationship with her.

Maxim told us that despite his name being left out of the birth certificate, he had sent money to cover the delivery costs and continues to support the family financially. He has also kept trying to be a part of his child’s life.

“For first 3 years, I came to Singapore to visit my child more than 10 times. Sad to say, my relationship with my daughter has suffered because of the continued actions by my ex-partner and her family to alienate me. The last time I saw my child was in July of 2016”, he told TOC.

Since 2016, Maxim has been totally cut off from his daughter’s life. He tells us this was provoked when he refused to pay the $200,000 in cash that his ex had demanded to include his name in the birth certificate, and the $300,000 she had demanded in order to allow him to see his daughter.

Maxim apparently reached out to the Singaporean government but they were less than helpful, only advising him to settle the matter in court.

Unfortunately, the legal fees in Singapore are astronomical. Apparently, a few lawyers had quoted $7,000 – $10,000 just to get the paper work started. He was also told that the final costs could run up to $100,000. This differed greatly from where he came from. In Moscow, Maxim tells us the costs of family legal proceedings would be between $1,000 to $5,000.

“I understand that the standards of living in Singapore and Moscow may be different, but I find a such a huge multiple shocking! In my opinion, such overpriced legal fees literally result in an injustice and violate the right of one to protect his or her own interests,” he said.

What is happening to Maxim is not an isolated event, surely. Parents are denied access to their children everyday due to conflicts between two parents. Using a child as a bargaining chip is both immoral and harmful to the child. Every child deserves the opportunity to have a healthy relationship with both parents.

According to Family Justice Reform Singapore, 96% of children affected by divorce in this country lose a meaningful relationship with one biological parent because of the Court’s refusal to grant Shared Care and Control. This is something they’re hoping to change. You can sign the Family Justice Reform petition here.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Police to set up more cameras in hawker centres and other public areas

The Singapore Police Force has announced the completion of the installation of…

路透社:马国去年10月实施海沙出口禁令 或影响大士港填海

根据《路透社》引述马来西亚官员消息指出,马国自去年10月开始,禁止出口海沙到新加坡,可能影响开发大士(Tuas)巨型港口的填海工程。 路透社指两名马国高级官员透露,在马国首相马哈迪上任后五个月,就实施上述出口禁令,因后者不满海沙出口被一些腐败官员牟利,再者马国土地被用来扩展狮城海岸。 至于马国首相新闻秘书恩迪沙兹里( Endie Shazlie Akbar,)也确认,马国政府去年禁止出口沙子,是为了打击非法走私沙子的行为,但不是因为马哈迪不满狮城的填海计划。 路透社称,为避免外交风波,马国政府并未公开上述禁令。 另一方面,新加坡国家发展部未直接回应有关马国沙子出口禁令,仅强调我国有多个国家供应沙子来源,政府也一直鼓励该行业减少对沙子的依赖。 至于不愿具名的两位新加坡沙子进口商,表示沙子来源越来越稀缺,我国甚至必须远从印度进口,导致成本增加,单单运输费就是进口沙的最大单项成本。 他们透露,近年新加坡囤积沙子,以缓解突发的供应瓶颈。 由于沙产业不透明,也没有国家价格参照,致使很难衡量禁令对马国经济的影响。 联合国数据:去年狮城进口马国近六千吨沙子 根据联合国商品数据库(COMTRADE),2018年,新加坡从马国进口5千900万吨沙子,费用高达3.47亿美元,着占了新加坡在2018年沙子进口总量的97巴仙;占马国全球沙子销售量的95巴仙。不过,数据并未明细分出沙子种类。…

Establishing the Internet as a credible opinion base

The Internet has tremendous potential but must not be undermined by irresponsible reporting or interpretative proclivities. Lester Lim

Singapore’s anti-“fake news” Bill expected to come into force in second half of 2019

Singapore’s Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Bill, which was introduced in…