Reading this study conducted by Yale in relation to fear and its relationship with conservative views, it becomes clear to me why Singaporeans seem so unwilling to embrace change. Even if there are things that people are not happy about, it takes a lot for us to be willing to try something different.

According to reports by Yale, fear is ingrained young and once ingrained, those so indoctrinated are strongly motivated to stay free from harm. at all cost even if it defies logic.

Only when they feel “safe” will they embrace more liberal ideals. Translate this into a Singaporean context, is this why we seem so reluctant to even consider anything against the grain?

Is there the misplaced notion that anything remotely “different” or non conforming is “unsafe” and therefore should be avoided at cost? Does this explain our aversion to change? Taking another step back, has this fear been ingrained young and has the government played a part in this indoctrination of fear?

We certainly like to pigeon hole things. This goes straight to the heart of government administration. From the forms that we have to fill in to our NRIC details, everything has to “fit” So much so that mixed race people have to be forced into category – ie. People of Philippine descent as Malays – just so they are put somewhere. Even if it doesn’t fit, it will be made to fit.

Is this efficiency or is it blind adherence out of fear? After all, this is how we have managed to have a Malay President who is arguably Indian. Jokes aside, is this why we are blindly loyal to the notion that there is no better party than the Peoples’ Action Party (PAP) to lead the country?

Now, I am not suggesting that they aren’t the best party. All I am saying is this –  are we consistently returning them to power because we genuinely feel they are the best or because of baseless fear for change?

Applying the Yale study to a Singaporean context, it may well be possible that we have been ingrained with fear since young and as adults blindly make decisions based on fear. I don’t have concrete answers on this but it is certainly food for thought worth exploring ahead of the next election.

If we do decide that the PAP is indeed the right party for us. It must be for the right reasons. It cannot simply be a fear based reaction. Otherwise, we end up shortchanging ourselves and our future generations to come.

 

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

WP’s Yee Jenn Jong disagrees with Minister Masagos Zulkifli’s statement about nurses wanting to wear tudung at work

Workers’ Party (WP) politician and former Non-Constituency Member of Parliament (NCMP) Yee…

Moody's downgrades pandemic-stricken Singapore banking sector to "negative"

The outlook of Singapore’s banking sector has been downgraded by Moody’s from…

PAP Supporter: It is the parents and not MOE who inflicted shame on child

In the recent saga of Ministry of Education (MOE) hitting back at…

马国宗教活动1万6000人出席!

根据马国媒体报导,在上月27日至3月1日,于吉隆坡大城堡Masjid Jamek回教堂举行的2020年大马传教士集会,多达1万6000人出席,其中有1万4500名都是马国人。 根据马国卫生总监诺希山在今日凌晨发布的图表,显示上述活动的出席人数,根据该图表,目前于该集会感染群有关的国内外人士有17人,分别为大马6人以及汶莱11人。 另一方面,马国东马砂拉越也出现三起确诊病例,其中两名患者也曾出席上述活动。 不过,根据我国卫生部文告,截至本月12日中午12时,本地新增的九起九起武汉冠状病毒(COVID-19)确诊病例中,其中有两名国人曾出席上述活动,他们是第183例(29岁男公民)和187例(48岁男公民)。 目前已知我国有多达95人曾出席有关活动,我国卫生部正进行追踪确认参与者。 主管回教事务的环境及水源部长马善高也已宣布,今日起本地所有回教堂将关闭五天,进行消毒清洗,而回教堂也将在未来两周内取消所有活动与课程。