It is now public knowledge that Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong is suing veteran Singaporean blogger, Leong Sze Hian for defamation over a Facebook share he made on his Facebook profile, on 7 Nov.

The article which Leong shared was an article by Malaysian online news media, TheCoverage.my. It claimed that editor-in-chief of investigative journalism platform Sarawak Report (SR) Ms Clare Rewcastle had mentioned Singapore as “one of the key investigation targets, alongside Switzerland and United States” in the 1MDB scandal during an interview with Malaysian media.

The article was written based on what States Times Review (STR) wrote, entitled, “Lee Hsien Loong becomes 1MDB’s key investigation target”, which was published on 5 Nov.

The claim by STR was rebutted by SR, calling it “misleading” and “erroneous,” and made a request for STR to “correct the false claim.”

TOC understands that Leong was served a letter of demand by the Info-communications Media Development Authority (IMDA) on 10 Nov, to take down the Facebook share within six hours, saying that the content is against the Internet Code of Conduct. Leong is understood to have complied with IMDA’s demand, by taking the post down.

TOC had asked around and understand from other netizens that they were not served with the same letter from IMDA despite sharing the same article which Leong did.

On 12 Nov, a letter of demand was served to Leong’s residence while he was not around. The letter from Drew &Napier demanded Leong to make a public apology and compensate PM Lee for damages.

The letter wrote, “Those allegations are false and baseless and constitute a very serious libel against our client, and disparage and impugn his character, credit and integrity,” PM Lee’s lawyers, led by Senior Counsel Davinder Singh and added that it was clear that Leong had published the post “maliciously and to damage our client”.

The Straits Times reported that the court documents claimed that the offending words in the article, “meant and were understood to mean that the Plaintiff corruptly used his position as Prime Minister to help Mr Najib Razak launder 1MDB’s billions”.

It further states that as a separate and distinct libel, the offending words in Mr Leong’s Facebook post “meant and were understood to mean that the Plaintiff was complicit in criminal activity relating to 1MDB”.

Together, these words “are false and baseless and were calculated to disparage and impugn the Plaintiff in his office as the Prime Minister”, PM Lee’s lawyers said.

However, TOC had seen the offending Facebook post before it was removed and note that the article was shared without any captions. Meaning Leong did not include any comments of his own other than sharing the STR article.

In response to media queries, Ms Chang Li Lin, the press secretary to the Prime Minister, confirmed that PM Lee had commenced legal proceedings against Leong for defamation, and said that the matter is in the hands of PM Lee’s lawyers.

“Mr Lee reserves the right to take legal action against other parties who similarly defame him,” she added.

In 2014, PM Lee sued Roy Ngerng for defamation after the blogger made references to PM Lee against the accused leaders of City Harvest Church. Ngerng was subsequently ordered to pay Mr Lee $150,000 in damages after he apologised to him as according to PM Lee’s demand.

Correction: The article that Leong had shared was from TheCoverage.my and not States Times Review.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

东南亚非法野生动物贸易”令人震惊“ 国际组织吁我国加强打击贩卖活动

东南亚非法野生动物贸易水平“令人震惊”,国际组织认为尽管新加坡的相关打击非法贩卖条规足够,但有鉴于我国是贸易中转枢纽,应采取更多措施遏制贩卖活动。 该报告由国际野生物贸易研究组织TRAFFIC所发表,研究了最近10个东南亚国家协会(ASEAN)数以千次成功缉捕的数据。报告指出,新加坡的法律的量刑率很高,普遍足够,但也强调其量刑期限不足,因为平均是为八年,而新加坡仅两年刑期。 其非法贩卖野生动物包括犀牛角、象牙等珍贵物品。一般而言,这些被抓捕的野生动物将供饲养、高端商品以及传统药材作用。 此外,报告表示,关于贸易数据,新加坡在某些条例上的明确度有待提升。 针对东南亚的非法野生动物贸易,TRAFFIC区域主任卡尼莎(Kanitha Krishnasamy)表示,“东南亚没有一天是不抓捕野生动物的,而且其数量也是令人惊人。” 担忧仍有许多非法贩卖活动 然而报告也透露,目前所揭露的数字仅仅是成功缉捕的数字,那也只是一小部分,相信还有更多的非法野生动物贩卖的活动正在进行。 尽管报告指出,新加坡在打击非法贩卖野生动物的法规与法律是足够的,但仍采取更多措施遏制贩卖活动。 举例而言,报告也指出,新加坡仍然查获大量的象牙和穿山甲鳞片,由此可见,新加坡如今仍是东南亚非法贩卖爬行类动物与鸟类动物的中转站,贩卖者利用我国港口偷运上述物品。 去年截获大量象牙穿山甲   …

Budget 2011: Feeling you can get there by working hard

By: Ravi Philemon There were many highlights in Budget 2011.  For one,…

读者来函:国父的建国价值观怎么了?

早前,因为文章被指涉及诽谤内容,和本社总编许渊臣一同接受警方调查的读者Willy Sum(笔名),在沉寂一段时日后,于昨日撰文阐述对近期发生在自身的事件表达看法,表示自己是秉持良心发声,也吁请大家不要停止对努力建设美好社会的追求和坚持。 亲爱的新加坡国民, 对于《网络公民》许总编和我本人来说,自被“逮捕”以来,我们经历了较动荡的两周。 我当时受到警方来函,逮捕令指示我必须在指定时间内现身录供,但即使重大案件的嫌犯,也会被给与两、三星期的期限来釐清嫌疑! 在“刑事诽谤”指控下接受调查期间,我感到我被当作国家敌人般处理。即便我寄给工人党议员毕丹星、和此案完全无关的电邮和信息也要被调查,令我感到冒犯,完全没有人的尊严。 执法当局没收了我们的电子设备,这是都是我们赖以反抗现代压迫的工具,向老百姓们揭示种种的不公和差异。如果这些议题继续扫在地毯下,无需接受民众质询,民间生活不会获得改善。 促使我仍继续为社会正义落笔的原因,是我国寡头政治体系施政造成的诸多严重问题。绝对的权力几乎不受审查,国家机构的职能形同虚设!对建制派提出的质疑声音,也会遭来政府机关的蛮力威胁。 我从未诋毁并造成他人对政府失去信心,但是种种事件,包括总统制修宪、2015选举承诺跳票增消费税、屋龄40以上的老组屋屋价下跌,还有欧思礼38号风波,都在考验着国人对政府的信任。 敢问,这会是我们国父建立这个国家的价值观吗?如果不是,那么在李光耀先生仙逝后,我们的国家怎么了?我恳请大家好好思考,我们究竟要一个怎样的新加坡社会?现在的施政制度,真的符合您的理想吗? 我们作为部落客和社运份子,秉持良心竭尽心力,通常是自掏腰包和安危自负的情况下,为公众发声和争取大家的权益。但如今一个接着一个,被国家以诉讼和刑事指控来对付。若我们无法继续走下去,我们恳请您,还有更多有志之士,能把共建美好社会的使命传承下去。