During the round table discussion on wages in the ages of disruptions hosted by Straits Times, National University of Singapore Professor Dr Tommy Koh argued that the government’s apparent resistance towards implementing a minimum wage in the Republic is rooted in “fake” ideological arguments.

The Ambassador-at-Large at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said that the Singapore government has always insisted that minimum wage produces unemployment. He added, “I would say, look at the experiences of Japan, South Korea, Taiwan and Hong Kong – all of which have introduced minimum wage. there were no such consequences.”

The hour long discussion also included Temasek Holdings chairman Mr Lim Boon Heng, NTUC assistant secretary-general and chair of the tripartite committees on the Progressive Wage Model Mr Zainal Sapari, president of the Association of Small and Medium Enterprises Mr Kurt Wee, and co-founder of cleaning start-up Nimbus Mr Daniel Thong.

Declaring that the Highlighting that schemes such as the Progressive Wage Model (PWM) and the Workfare Income Supplement (WIS) are not the same as a minimum wage, Prof Koh said “With great respect to both of you, the Workfare Income Supplement (WIS) at the moment… is so modest that it has not elevated poor workers out of poverty”.

And in response the suggestion that the introduction go a minimum wage would adversely affect the local economy, Prof Koh said, “When we moved from a five-and-a-half-day to a five-day week, it had no negative impact on the competitiveness of the Singapore economy. And I dare predict that if we have a minimum wage, it will have no negative economic impact on our economy.”

During the round table discussion, Prof Koh also emphasised that there are too many people in Singapore who do not earn a living wage. He said, “I aspire to a situation in which every working man and woman in Singapore can earn a living wage. What is a living wage? A living wage is a wage that enables the worker his or her family to live in dignity and in material sufficiency.”

Netizens came out in agreement of Prof Koh’s vehement argument for the implementation of a minimum wage, echoing his point that a minimum wage will go far in helping many Singaporeans out of poverty:

Summing up his view, Prof Koh laid out three points on minimum wage.

  1. Singapore’s economic policy has always been ‘growth with equity’ and that all citizens should have a share in the country’s growing prosperity.
  2. We should be concerned about the extent of poverty in a nation as rich as Singapore (ranked 8th richest country in the world by the IMF) and find acceptable ways to reduce poverty
  3. There are too many people in Singapore who do not earn a living wage

The third point in particular seems to have resonated with netizens who agree with Prof Koh’s argument that a living wage is a major consideration for the implementation of a minimum wage.

Netizens also pointed out that the argument that a minimum wage will reduce Singapore’s competitiveness in the labour market is a weak one:

While other’s noted the irony of ministers arguing against a minimum wage when they receive high salaries themselves and probably haven’t experienced the hardships that low-income families in Singapore struggle with on a daily basis:

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

【冠状病毒19】两地点再有确诊病例到访 确诊病例到访地新增四个

冠状病毒19确诊病例曾到访的地点增加了四个,包括一家榴莲店,而新世界中心的昇菘超市和穆斯达法购物中心再次有确诊病例到访。 卫生部于昨晚(6月29日)发出的文告中,促请曾于相同时段内到相关地点的民众密切关注自身健康状况,而当局也已经向和确诊病例有亲密接触者发出通知。若民众出现急性呼吸道感染症状、或发烧、或失去味觉或嗅觉,请尽快求医,并向医生报告曾到访的地点。 据卫生部文告指出,确诊病患曾到访的地点和时段为: 6月19日晚上8时15分至9时15分:大巴窑4巷的Everyday Spa 6月21日傍晚6时至晚上7时:武吉巴督11街的Siam Square Mookat 6月22日中午12时15分至12时45分:长堤坊Causeway Point 6月23日晚上8时30分至10时15分:芽笼608号的Durian36 6月24日晚上7时55分至8时40分:穆斯达法购物中心…

Dr Tan Cheng Bock raises questions on Law Minister’s contradictory statements on AGC’s advice and wonders why PM did not answer Ms Lim’s questions himself

Dr Tan Cheng Bock, former People’s Action Party Member of Parliament and…

Woman investigated for not wearing mask, reported as an ex-RSN Major commanding mine-sweeper

It was reported that a woman who refused to wear a face…

民主党:政府恰恰错过关键时机 让新加坡进行必要改革

上月18日,副总理兼财政部长宣布2020财政预算案,对此新加坡民主党主席淡马亚(Paul Tambyah),曾点评今年财案“充满小调整,却缺乏大胆举措”。 本周三,民主党再举办网络论坛直播。该党认为政府看似过于专注“微调而复杂的计划”,却恰恰错过了一个关键的时机,让新加坡进行必要的改革,以减低工薪阶层与中产阶级的财政负担。 民主党连同财政主管林文兴、主席淡马亚、江伟贤以及Alfred Tan回应2020 财政预算案,并针对几项关键措施与问题提出建议与看法。 首先针对增加消费税一事,林文兴表示,鉴于新加坡的中产阶级与工薪阶层正受困于日益高昂的生活成本,政府应将调涨消费税(GST)的计划取消,而不仅仅是推迟。 林文兴:应取消调涨消费税 因为这大大影响了工薪一族的财务管理、工作效能甚至是退休前景,而且新加坡的外汇储备已相当膨胀,为何仍需要提高消费税? 他指出,“自2016至2018年,我们所累计的财政盈余(budget surplus)已高达191亿美元,即使将扣除赤字109亿美元,我们仍有82亿元的余额。” 林文兴亦提及,曾任副总理的尚曼达于2015年大选前的声明,表示应取消医疗等基本必需品的消费税,提高奢侈品的消费税。…