A post went viral recently on Facebook about an incident at National University Hospital (NUH) involving a pregnant woman not receiving care and attention fast enough. The post was shared by a woman who happened to be in the Emergency Department (EMD) at the same time – she had recorded a video of the incident and shared it on her Facebook page.

In a nutshell, the woman, Preet Sandhu, wrote that she saw that an agitated man was apparently trying to get the attention of a male nurse at the NUH EMD because his wife was in labour. Ms Sandhu recounted seeing the pregnant lady in a wheelchair, her face contorted in extreme pain.

Screenshot of original post (Image from Nur Shah / Facebook)
Screenshot of original post (Image from Nur Shah / Facebook)

Apparently, the male nurse and his female colleague were slow to respond and only leapt into action after the lady started to ask the pregnant woman if she was ok and when a phone was pulled out by Ms Sandhu. She had described the male nurse as being ‘rude/arrogant’ who had a ‘don’t care attitude’. According to Preet, the incident lasted about 15 to 16 minutes.

The post was shared by Birth Doula Dil My and promptly went viral. However, the original post has since been removed, apparently per the request of the pregnant woman (now mother) who did not give permission for a video of her to be shared.

The birth doula followed up with another post to educate the public on the stages of labour, indirectly chiding the original poster for misunderstanding the stage of labour the woman was in, noting that she was in the early stage still and not ready to push. So the male nurse not immediately jumping into action as not actually an issue.

From NUH, they have issued a statement on their Facebook page saying that they’ve looked into the incident and found that the woman was admitted into a delivery suite approximately 4 minutes from the time she entered the EMD.

They even said, “We acknowledge that our staff could have shown more empathy and have since reached out to the patient and her husband to apologise for their experience.”

Many netizens, however, were supportive of NUH, saying they needn’t apologise since they did nothing wrong and in fact performed their duty admirably.

Many even shared their own experiences with that specific male nurse who they all agreed was patient, kind, and friendly.

The woman who made the original post, Preet Sandhu, maintains her account of events, calling NUH’s version of the incident ‘fake news’.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Beware! The "smear campaign" returns

By Tan Jee Say – Someone using the moniker of 'Tan Roar'…

Local start-up looks to produce breast milk without the need of nursing mothers

A Singapore start-up company is all set to tap into the lucrative…

缩短车程达55分钟 地铁跨岛线直穿自然保护区

自2013年宣布兴建跨岛线,经咨询公众与自然爱好组织,陆交局决定沿着自然保护区底下“直接”跨岛。 交通部宣布,有关跨岛路线的研究方案将于明年开始,可能会需要两年的时间完成研究。该项决策已权衡各项因素,包括不同利益相关者,以及对破坏环境的评估,决定采用直达的方式。 但相较其他方案,该决策直达的方式能让新加坡人减少至少六分钟的通勤时间。目前从白沙到裕廊,搭地铁和巴士需约90分钟,有了跨岛线,可缩短到约55分钟。 此外,由于路线较短,民众也可以支付较低的票价,也为纳税人的建筑成本减少约20亿元。 “就长期而言,这是一项更具环保的选择,因为其能耗更低”,陆交局表示。 在地底穿过自然保护区建造的直透路线全长约四公里,经过新加坡乡村俱乐部、中央积水自然保护区、以及泛岛高速公路。其中两公里隧道将建在麦里芝保护区底下。 然而针对自然保护区的建设,新加坡基础设施统筹部长兼交通部长许文远表示,调整路线时曾一度陷入胶着状况,因为自然保护区是新加坡较特殊的部分,他感谢自然团体的建议和理解,并承诺在项目研究与建设时,持续与他们合作。 据悉,其绕道路线沿着自然保护区边缘建造,全长九公里,深45米,其中更需避开主要设施如环线隧道、汤申东海岸线地下隧道、深隧道阴沟系统及高压电缆隧道等。 其隧道最深达70米左右,犹如25层楼组屋,并全程以花岗岩石层挖掘,减少施工造成的震动,以及避免土壤移动。 许文远表示,跨岛线对于需要经常通勤至跨岛的民众而言是非常重要的,大大提升了他们的生活质量。 “跨岛线也会对其他地铁枢纽线如裕廊湖区,以及盛港、榜鹅与后港的按单建屋新地区都有着重大影响,至少能够满足一百万人次通勤需求。” 据了解,在咨询期间,若干自然组织针对建设所带来的影响提出异议,并表示若未能采取缓解措施,其动植物的生态环境将会遭受破坏。…