Photo from Minister Tan’s Facebook page.

Minister Tan Chuan-Jin hits back at reports about him and his grassroots leaders being given special clearance at Tuas Immigration Checkpoint on Jul 17, and said that it is unfortunate that MP for Hougang, Mr Png Eng Huat and his colleagues chose to politicise the issue.

The Minister for Social and Family Development said in a Facebook posting on July 19 that he joined his residents on a one-day durian trip to JB on Sunday as well as to make an official visit to the Deputy Home Affairs Minister’s Hari Raya Open House. He added that he travelled by bus so that he could be with his residents and volunteers during the trip.

Just yesterday, Mr Png noted in his Facebook post that a counter was opened specially for Minister Tan who was also in Malaysia to join his residents for a tour. He added that while most people in the queue probably did not mind the counter being specially opened for Minister Tan as being a Minister does come with privileges, it is somewhat unacceptable that an entourage of grassroots leaders and members with shopping bags in tow also enjoyed the privilege of fast clearance at the custom without needing to join the crowd.

Mr Png noted that no one else from the other queues could use that specially opened counter.

Just this morning, Immigration and Checkpoint Authority (ICA) confirmed Mr Png’s recollection of events and clarified matters from its perspective via a post on its Facebook fanpage.

In his explanation of why the grassroots leaders were allowed to use the special clearance counter, Minsiter Tan wrote, “Mr Png seems to accept that it’s reasonable that our office holders get facilitated, if so, then surely the others in that bus need to be cleared as well so that the bus can leave and not add to the vehicular queues there.”

Minister Tan slammed Mr Png in his posting by saying, “But the purpose of his post, and that of his compatriots, was clear. It was not about the old folks. It was aimed at stirring hate and anger, not only to be directed at me, which I can understand politically, but also at my residents and volunteers (who organised as well as helped guide each bus), as well as our officers who secure our borders. It’s unfortunate that he and his colleagues chose to politicise the issue.”

Mr Tan had kept silent about Mr Png’s posting till ICA released their version of what had happened.

Below is Minister Tan’s clarification and comments in full

I joined my residents on a one-day durian trip to JB on Sunday as well as to make an official visit to the Deputy Home Affairs Minister’s Hari Raya Open House. It was a good visit as we discussed a range of issues including security concerns we all faced.

I travelled by bus so that I could be with my residents and volunteers during the trip. It is not easy to plan for and organize these trips, especially when there are so many people and when our residents visited various locations. But our grassroots leaders did a great job and it was a meaningful experience for most, if not all our residents.

At day’s end, I bid farewell to every resident and sent them off after dinner. One by one we dispatched the 20 buses as they proceeded independently back to the different alighting points, so that residents didn’t have to commute too far to get home. We tracked the progress with the respective bus ICs.

On the return journey, ICA facilitated the clearance for me and my security officers who were carrying their firearms, as well as the residents and volunteers who were with me on my bus.

Our ICA officers do not have an easy responsibility. Cross border traffic at the causeway is one of the highest in the world. They have to maintain security while also trying to ensure a smooth flow of people entering and departing daily. I know because I too have been in the queues when on personal trips.

I had the impression Mr Png waited a very long time. He also lamented about old folks having difficulties in the queues. ICA checked their cameras to ascertain the waiting time. He carefully omits to mention that he waited for all of 30 mins. I actually bumped into Louis Ng too. He and his delegation were also in the queue for about half an hour or so.

Mr Png seems to accept that it’s reasonable that our office holders get facilitated, if so, then surely the others in that bus need to be cleared as well so that the bus can leave and not add to the vehicular queues there.

But the purpose of his post, and that of his compatriots, was clear. It was not about the old folks. It was aimed at stirring hate and anger, not only to be directed at me, which I can understand politically, but also at my residents and volunteers (who organised as well as helped guide each bus), as well as our officers who secure our borders. It’s unfortunate that he and his colleagues chose to politicise the issue.

Mr Png knows that it is standard procedure, all around the world, that Ministers, both from the home country and from visiting countries, get facilitated through immigration. When our Ministers visit overseas officially, they get facilitated, and likewise when Ministers from overseas visit us, they also get facilitated.

And oh, by the way, any traveler who requires special assistance can approach our ICA officers on duty. I believe it is more effective and real to assist our fellow Singaporeans in this way.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Will the Lease Buyback Scheme increase intergenerational inequality?

By Aloysius Chia Recently, it was announced during the National Day Rally…

【武汉冠状病毒】首两名病患离世! 包括一名本地75岁女公民

新加坡卫生部发文告证实,今日(21日)有两名武汉冠状病毒(COVID-19)确诊病患不幸离世。 第一名离世病患是75岁女公民,她在上月23日因肺炎症状送入国家传染病中心,同日确诊。自入院以来就一直需要待在加护病房接受治疗。 她较后出现严重并发症,最终在今早7时52分,不敌病魔离世。她本身有慢性心脏病和高血压病史。 第二名患者时64岁印尼男子。本月13日病重被送入国家传染病中心加护病房,隔日确诊。他出现严重并发症,并在今早10时15分病逝。在入院前他曾因肺炎症状入院,也有心脏病史。 卫生部长颜金勇对他们的逝世感到悲痛,并将为病逝者家属予以协助。

The childcare teacher – not your high-class maid (Part 2)

Rachel Zeng looks at the perceived role of childcare teachers in S’pore.

工人党三领袖募捐诉讼费用 短短两日筹获近48万元

为应付市镇会诉讼案费用,工人党前党魁刘程强、主席林瑞莲和秘书长毕丹星,透过专为诉讼案设立的网站“秉诚行事”(in good faith),向公众募捐。截至昨晚10时,短短两日内,成功筹获47万7653元,捐款民众和单位达2千832人之多。 在两天前,筹款数目为6万5196元,翻倍达7倍之多。 网页中的募捐文告提到,目前三人面对两项诉讼,指控他们与另外两名市镇会理事会的理事,在管理市镇会时造成损失,并被索赔3千万元。 文告坚称以上指控不属实,指出他们“秉诚行事”,所作决策乃以居民和市镇会利益为依归。 文告称,从诉讼程序开始到现在,三人不会挪用工人党款项应对诉讼,而是动用自己的储蓄和朋友的资助,来支付近60万元的律师费。 目前,工人党市镇会风波诉讼已进行到第15日,预计整个诉讼审讯程序,还要进行到下月2日。 文告称,支付律师费用已经掏空了他们的个人的经济来源,他们急需资金打这场可能是他们面临破产的官司。 工人党澄清未以党名义为三领袖募捐 另一方面,担忧有心人士冒用工人党名义募捐,工人党在官方脸书专页,向支持者澄清,上述三名工人党领袖是以个人名义为诉讼案募款,工人党并未为他们展开任何募款。 “我们的三位国会议员是以他们个人的名义进行筹款。”…