Image: Wikipedia

Member of Parliament from Aljunied GRC, Ms Sylvia Lim asked in parliament on Monday about the cost of the extra days of National Day Parade (NDP) rehearsals at the Sports Hub and whether the government expects to pay similar amounts for future years when the Sports Hub is chosen as the NDP venue again.
In his reply, Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen said that previous NDPs at the Marina Bay Floating Platform had cost between $15.7 million and $17.9 million. He also listed the prices of the other NDPs held in recent years.
2010 (Padang) – $20.6 million
2015 (Marina Bay Floating Platform) – $40.5 million
2016 – $39.4 million
Mr Ng said that the venue costs for the parade this year make up about 15 per cent of the total cost, higher than that for the public spaces at the Marina Bay Floating Platform and Padang. 22 per cent for Padang due to the audience stand that has to be constructed and 4 per cent for Marina Bay Floating Platform.
When Ms Lim tried to clarify with Mr Ng with the exact cost of rental for the new National Stadium. Mr Ng retorted her by saying, “15 per cent is a figure”.
If 15 per cent of the total cost of NDP 2016 is for rental, that means the NDP organisers will be spending $5.9 million dollars for the rental at National Stadium compared to about $700 thousand for venue cost at the Marina Bay Floating Platform.
Dr Ng said about half of the bill for a parade held in the National Stadium will be for the show segment, which is consistent with the editions held at the other two venues.
Although the percentage of the show segment is the same, this would mean that about $20 million will be spent on the show segment in NDP 2016 as compared to about $9 million in Marina Bay Floating Platform and about $10 at Padang.
Due to safety reasons and space constraint, the traditional mobile column from the Army and “Red Lions” will not be present in the NDP 2016. However, Dr Ng said that the new setting of the Sports Hub will offer “a different type of show” because its big confined space and central pitch allows for a large stage. The stadium’s seating capacity of 55,000 is also more than double that of the floating platform and the Padang, which can each accommodate 25,000 people.
MP for Sembawang GRC, Vikram Nair asked if the increase of seats would mean that more Singaporeans would get to view the shows as many are disappointed every year because they were not successfully in the ticket ballots.
In reply, Mr Ng said that there will be still many more who could not get their seats than who can apply and said that the show will be on live-broadcast for public.
MP for Chua Chu Kang GRC, Mr  Zaqy Mohamad asked whether the Ministry of Defence had considered holding rehearsals off-site.
Dr Ng replied that he leaves to the executive committee of the NDP to decide whether rehearsals should be conducted away from the stadium and said that many rehearsals are already held off-site, with some rehearsals being held eight months prior to actual NDP.
Ms Lim in her follow-up questions asked if there was a dispute resolution mechanism for venue use under the public-private partnership with the Sports Hub and whether a detailed cost breakdown of this year’s NDP will be included in the Government’s Budget statement later this month. She also commented that the government have said that the NDP for SG50 is an exceptional case and asked if the NDP for 2016 would be used as a benchmark.
Dr Ng said he expects any recourse to be similar to that for all public contracts for events held in private venues and he stressed that there was “no dispute”.
In December 2015, the news reported that NDP organisers were told to pay $26 million for leasing the venue for an extra 35 days for rehearsals. (ST link)

On the question of the breakdown of the NDP budget, Mr Ng replied irritatedly, “(Ms Lim) has been in this House for many years. She knows that we don’t provide those details in the Budget — and if you ask a question, we’ll tell you,”
On the question of SG50 celebrations used as a benchmark for future parades in “non-milestone years”, Dr Ng said: “I never said that last year’s NDP would be used as a benchmark. This is what (Ms Lim) has said.”
He added: “I’ve provided many figures, including the fact that the number of spectators … will be more than double, (but Ms Lim) has chosen not to talk on that figure but to move back to her points.”
Ms Lim further chased Mr Ng to reply on the point about the SG50 NDP benchmark however Mr Ng harshly replied, “This is a theoretical question that I don’t want to answer.”
Editor’s note – Note that the budget for the NDP is twice as much as the conventional NDPs in the past and just a million odd difference from Singapore’s jubilee NDP celebration.
The construction and management of the sports hub were placed under a private-public partnership (PPP) scheme for a 25-year lease period. The selected developer is required to design, build, finance and operate the Sports Hub during the lease period. The total cost of the project ballooned to $1.33 billion from the initial estimate of $600 million to $800 million. The Government, through Sport Singapore, will reimburse the company with an annual sum until the end of the lease.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

乌节豪杰大厦谋杀案一被告弃保潜逃,法庭发出拘捕令

乌节豪杰大厦谋杀案的其中一名被告弃保潜逃,目前法庭已发出拘捕令。 该起命案发生于今年7月发生的乌节豪杰大厦里,死者疑似与人在夜店起冲突,被人一刀割喉后负伤倒地,送院抢救无效。警方于12小时内将七人逮捕归案,分别是陈云胜(26岁)、陈家兴(26岁)、洪大源(26岁)、萧玉珍(22岁)、陈显扬(27岁)、卢文聪(25岁)以及陈洪成(22岁)共6男1女在谋杀罪名下被控。 原七名被告被控纠众谋杀罪名,但陈洪成、陈家兴与卢文聪随后被改为持有武器的同谋。 而案件原定今日过堂,但陈洪成却缺席。据悉,陈洪成母亲已在三天前向警方报案,尽管予以48小时内寻回,但却一无所获。其代表律师陈俊良向法官表示,将继续担任陈洪成律师直到陈洪成被捕。 为此,陈洪成母亲需在十月出席聆讯解释来龙去脉,并向法庭设法说明1万5000元保金不应该被充公的理由。 7月3日,一名印裔男子不知何故在二楼夜店与人起冲突,离去时似乎出言挑衅,遭人亮刀割喉,重伤倒在商场的门口。 男子随后被送往陈笃生医院抢救,由于伤势过重,严重失血而导致抢救无果。 死者是31岁的沙迪斯(Satheesh Noel s/o Gobidass),根据附近商店的闭路电视拍摄画面,以及证人指出,死者在生前遭五六名男子追打,不久后沿着手扶梯跑下楼,最终倒地在商场门前。 从周围地板血迹而言,死者似乎是负伤后尝试逃跑。死者在不支倒下后,民众用大量纸巾帮他止血,不断与他对话确保他保持清醒。

Malaysian AGC contradicts AG’s directions in the case of a Singaporean Man

On October 9 2018, the Malaysian Immigration Department detained Gilbert Louis, a…

印度一大学涉卖假文凭 15工作准证持有者遭人力部调查

印度一所大学–玛纳夫巴迪(Manav Bharti)大学,被当地执法机构揭发,11年来”贩卖“多达3万6千份假文凭! 该大学共发出4万1千份文凭,但只有5千名毕业生是真材实料的。此事件曝光,也让当地民众质疑,有关基金会所运营的其他学府,是否也涉及或参与出售假文凭。 本社早前在知名求职和人才招聘网站领英(LinkedIn)搜寻,发现确实有一些领英账号,在简介中提及曾在玛纳夫巴迪大学就读,且自称目前在新加坡工作。 对此,人力部也跟进此事,表示正在调查15名自称“考获”上述大学文凭的工作证件持有者。 人力部强调,若一经证实学历造假,他们的工作证件就立即被撤销,且永久被禁止到新加坡工作。 当局也会在《雇用外来人力法令》下,提控文凭造假者,最高刑罚是两万元罚款、两年监禁或两者兼施。 该局指出,过去五年每年平均有660名外籍人士,申请工作准证时提呈假学历,结果被永久禁止入境。 每年平均有八名外籍人士,因申报假学历遭严惩。 人力部也重申,雇主聘请外籍人士,有责任确保他们的学历资格属实。

Impending S&CC hike for HDB residents, Govt to provide temporary relief

A recent report by the Straits Times highlighted comments from Lim Biow Chuan, coordinating chairman for PAP town councils, suggesting that Housing Board residents can anticipate a rise in Service and Conservancy Charges (S&CC) in the near future. S&CC, which covers expenses such as estate cleaning, landscaping, refuse collection, pest control, and maintenance of mechanical and electrical fixtures like lifts and lights, last saw a rise between $1 and $17 per month, phased over two years, in 2017. Mr Lim noted that town councils are grappling with increased cost pressures due to rising energy prices, maintenance costs, and manpower costs. Energy prices have surged by 23% between 2018 and 2023, while lift maintenance costs have risen because of higher labour and material costs. The implementation of the Progressive Wage Model to uplift low-wage workers has further contributed to increased operational costs for town councils.