An errant driver threatened a lady with his claim of being a civil servant after being pointed out that his vehicle was parked across motorcycle lots.
Ms Carrine Yeo wrote on her facebook post that a driver in his late fifties had parked his vehicle across 3 slots of motorcycle parking lot, near Ghim Moh market at about 10am on Thursday.
When confronted, the driver said that he was not parking at the spot but still proceeded to lock his car and walked away.
Ms Yeo then took a photo of the car’s position when the driver of the parked vehicle came out and asked for the reason for taking pictures of his car. He added that he would take photos of her motorbike as well.
Initially wanting to just let go of the case, Ms Yeo was spurred to share the story after threatened by his claim of being a civil servant.
She wrote, “Wrong threat. I used to be a civil servant and some part of me still feels like I’m part of the service; so this only made my blood boil. What a disgrace you are to the rest of the responsible, hardworking civil servants I know!”
Ms Yeo has since reported the case to Land Transport Authority (LTA) through onemotoring.com
TOC has also written to the LTA for further comments on the matter.
Below is the full post by Ms Yeo along with the photo taken of the parked vehicle.
So this just happened at the carpark opposite Ghim Moh market, 20 Ghim Moh Road.
I walked back to my bike and saw a BMW parked next to my ride. Which was weird because I thought I remembered that space was marked out for motorcycles. So I looked again to double check, true enough, the car had parked in the space meant for not one, not two, but three motorcycle lots.
At this point, the driver (a skinny bespectacled Chinese man in his late fifties?) alighted. He saw me looking at the markings on the ground, and asked if there’s a problem. Thinking that he might have been mistaken, I asked him if he knew he was parking over the motorcycle lots.

Guess what? He retorted in a challenging tone that I had my own parking space, and that I shouldn’t care. Said he ‘wasn’t parking’, then proceeded to lock his car and walk away.
I don’t know why, I took a photo of his beautifully parked car.
parkedmercs
Photo of parked BMW
He came back and asked if I took his photo (he must have lurking around), looking half worried and half frustrated.
(No Uncle, you are not Brad Pitt, why would I want to take your photo?)
I told him since he didn’t do anything wrong, he has nothing to worry about.
His retaliation? He pompously announced that since I took ‘his photo’, he would take mine as well. I gladly obliged.
(Sure, be my guest. My lovely Vespa is parked perfectly within my bike lot).
You know, under normal circumstances, I might have just let it go. I’ve never reported errant drivers, I don’t know which authority is in charge, and it’s really just too much trouble. But what this uncle said next really made me want to do something about it.
If he weren’t so obnoxiously rude, I might have let it go. He threatened me.
‘DO YOU KNOW WHO I AM? I’M A CIVIL SERVANT YOU KNOW!’
(Wrong threat. I used to be a civil servant and some part of me still feels like I’m part of the service; so this only made my blood boil. What a disgrace you are to the rest of the responsible, hardworking civil servants I know!)
‘YOU DON’T KNOW WHO YOU ARE MESSING WITH! YOU ARE PLAYING WITH YOUR ARSE!’
(Hmm, what kind of a metaphor is that?)
All the while ranting that he’s ‘not parking’, ‘not parking’. At which point I pointed out the red painted words on the ground to him – ‘NO PARKING’.
Mr All-Important-Civil-Servant, if you didn’t do anything wrong, why did you hastily drive away then? All the while reminding me loudly that I’m ‘playing with my arse’.
Mr All-Important-Civil-Servant, you are a disgrace to the public administration. I humbly suggest you use your Skillsfuture credits for a parking refresher course. Or basic etiquette. Or language improvement.
This would have been wonderful material for a teachable moment. What a waste!
Just for you, I’m going to educate myself on the procedures of reporting errant parking offenders. And don’t worry, it’s no trouble at all.
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

【选举】欣赏俄作曲家用音乐传达民意 方月光冀望把群众心声带入国会

民主党在此次选举,派出林文兴、达曼胡理、江伟贤和方月光团队攻打马西岭-油池集选区,硬撼由原国家发展部长黄循财领军的人民行动党团队。 尽管仅派出11名候选人,不过民主党在此次选举也算“下足重本”,竞选团队不乏拥有博士、医学教授等资历的人才。至于该党秘书长徐顺全在武吉巴督不屈不挠的精神,选民看好后者有望此次选举突围而出。 除了早前本社介绍过的林文兴、达曼胡理和江伟贤,马西岭-油池集选区团队中的方月光背景亦不可小觑,据民主党竞选官网介绍,他曾在外交部、内政部和国防部等机构担任要职,也曾担任新加坡驻北京大使馆首席秘书(政治与经济)。 事实上方月光还是奖学金得主,以及英国剑桥大学音乐系毕业生。《联合早报》稍早前专访方月光,从轻松角度谈他过去曾作曲追太太的经历,以及家人如何看待他从政等。 询及他将用什么古典乐来形同现在的新加坡?方月光表示自己最喜欢的音乐家是俄国作曲家肖斯塔科维奇(Dmitri Shostakovich),因为他的音乐非常有深度,也有很多政治内容,每个作曲都是对整个国家政治文化的表态。 “他有他的想法、理念,但也尽量把民生透过音乐带出来,让领导阶层者也能听到民声”。 他也表示这也是自己的理想,期望若有机会入国会,能把群众的心声带到国会。  

总理李显龙:无意废除刑法第377A条 但不曾阻止性少数群体生活

尽管政府并无意废除刑事法典第377A条,但总理李显龙表示并不曾阻碍任何公民生活的权力,以及科技人才的流入。 根据我国刑事法典第377A节条文,男性同性性行为属犯罪行为,一旦罪名成立可被判监禁长达两年。 李显龙总理昨日(26日)以主宾身份出席智慧国峰会,面对与会者提问,关于同性恋者的劳动者是否会纳入我国法律的保障时,总理则回应,377A条文仍“将保留在法律中一段时期”。 不边缘化性少数群体 然而,他续指,保有部分的条例,并不代表新加坡会将性少数族群(LGBTQ)边缘化,犹如刑法第377A条并不阻止粉红点每年的聚会。 “你知道新加坡的条例,无论是何种性倾向的人民 ,你都欢迎在新加坡工作。”他说。 “这就是我们的社会,我们并不像旧金山或其他中东国家,(我们)都是这里的人民…还有基于此条例架构,我们完全可以为科技与不同文化景象创造无限可能。”他指出。 李显龙的一番言论也引起广大网民的讨论,许多人分享自身与总理观点相反的经验。 网友Fourier Ang :我已经因为刑法377A条例离开新加坡…

Public Transport Council’s response to ensure compliance of QoS Standards

One of our readers sent in a letter to Public Transport Council…