One of our readers sent in a letter to Public Transport Council (PTC) last year, suggesting enhancements to their framework to ensure compliance to Quality of Service (QoS) standards.  We publish here, our readers email and PTC’s response.


Our readers email dated 14 Sep 2010:

Dear Sir / Madam,
I am a regular user of the public transport system.

My recent (over the past year) commuter experiences on the buses and trains have prompted me to question about whether the Quality of Service (QoS) Standards conducted by the Public Transport Council (PTC) are reflective of the experiences facing the average commuter, and if not, whether the system could be enhanced to provide a more accurate and comprehensive framework to ensure compliance of QoS Standards.

In light of the high costs associated with owning a car in land scarce Singapore, I am a proponent of the existence of the PTC as the independent regulator to oversee the fair management of the public transport system here. As a commuter, it is heartening to know that the PTC has already committed to establishing a framework (the QoS Standards) to define the level of service and performance that the commuter should expect to receive for their hard earned dollar. However, my main concern as a commuter is about how the assessment of QoS Standards is currently being conducted.

On that note, I would strongly urge the PTC to be transparent to the general public about when (and how often) inspections are conducted during the assessment of QoS Standards reporting. As a commuter, I would like to know whether the PTC has established guidelines about when (and how often) inspections are conducted before each 6-monthly report is released, to ensure that the assessment conducted was comprehensive and reflective of the services provided by the transport operators.

As an added measure, it would be helpful for the PTC to host feedback sessions for the general public to gather qualitative feedback about the performance of transport operators from a commuters’ point of view.

Ultimately, I hope that the PTC will strive to allow members of the public to report on instances where they feel that QoS Standards have been breached. It would be easy (and virtually costless) for the PTC to create a web page for commuters to log their information and to upload any supporting video or photographic evidence of the alleged breach – this would be similar to the way that the Singapore Police Force has engaged the public through their Neighbourhood Watch programmes. I believe that the QoS Standards which have been established are simple enough for all commuters to internalise and objectively assess, particularly with respect to standards about scheduled headway and loading. With the advent of video-enabled mobile phones and other hand-held devices, virtually every commuter would have the capability to assist the PTC in their monitoring of service standards. This system would additionally create the following benefits:

Allow real-time monitoring of QoS Standards adherence in any location, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week

By allowing commuters to upload videos onto the webpage, the PTC can get real-time feedback from commuters about operators’ adherence to QoS Standards on any route, at any given time. This would be especially useful in dealing with ad-hoc and unplanned stoppages which affect service routes;

Reduce the time and resources required for PTC officers to ensure compliance of QoS Standards

Instead of deploying officers to conduct random checks on routes, it would be more efficient for officers to oversee the information uploaded onto the webpage and conduct inspections in-person only on identified trouble spots;

Increase the timeliness and quality of services offered by the transport operators

By allowing commuters to make submissions to the webpage, the PTC will garner a larger sample set of data on the compliance of transport operators to the QoS Standards. This should not be meant to further punish or shame transport operators but rather, provide a much more accurate and comprehensive assessment of the services provided by operators. From a commuters perspective, it is hoped that a more transparent and dynamic feedback system will hold operators more accountable to improve the timeliness and quality of their services; and

Increase the level of engagement between commuters, PTC and transport operators

This system will increase the level of engagement between commuters, the PTC and transport operators, and encourage all parties to play their part in raising the standards of our public transport system. This system will allow commuters to feel that their voices are heard and that there is a transparent platform for them to provide honest feedback about QoS Standards compliance. The PTC will be able to win over the hearts of the general public if it is being seen to actively engage the commuter and follow-through on its role as a credible and independent regulator of the public transport system. Transport operators will also be able to receive a more accurate and comprehensive assessment on how their services are performing.

I would like the PTC to consider the points listed above and would make myself available, should you require any further clarification.

I look forward to your prompt response.

Sincerely,

D Tay (Mr)

PTC’s response dated 15 September 2010:

Dear Mr Tay

Thank you for your kind suggestions and points of interest. Please allow me to share that the actual performance of bus services is continuously tracked by the bus operators’ computerised fleet operation and management systems. Based on these databases, performance reports of all bus services are submitted to the PTC every month, and the PTC will assess the operators’ compliance with the QoS standards. To ensure that these performance reports are accurate and complete, the PTC together with its technical agent, the Land Transport Authority, regularly audits the operators’ reporting processes and systems.

The PTC also conducts an additional layer of checks to ascertain that the performance data actually matches commuters’ experience on the ground. The PTC conducts multiple on-site audits or spot checks every month. Such checks are done on selected bus services as well as those bus services with service lapses experienced by commuters and reported through feedback channels. Whilst we are not able to to host public sessions, nevertheless, we are always open to feedback, thus the home page of our website has recently been further enhanced to garner feedback from commuters. If any service lapse is identified, operators are asked to account for, and more importantly, take immediate action to rectify them, even before the PTC announces the results of its 6-monthly review of the operators’ performance against the QoS standards in April and October every year.

Nonetheless, there will be challenges on the ground, such as a shortage of buses or of bus captains. Issues such as occasional traffic jams will also throw bus services off-schedule. It would be unrealistic to expect 100% compliance all the time. Instead, we aim to incentivise the operators to meet real-world challenges dynamically, and to improve their performance on a continuous basis. In the most recent review period, the operators have indeed improved their performance, compared to the previous period.

The PTC will continue to monitor the bus operators’ performance and review the standards periodically to ensure they remain relevant to commuters’ travelling experience on public transport.

We appreciate such feedback and thank you for writing in.

xxx
for Secretary
Public Transport Council

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Speaker of Parliament claims presence of “false narratives” being spun regarding selection of adjournment motions

Noting his surprise at how some people have chosen to “spin a…

逾37万马国民众联署 吁禁中国公民入境

截至目前为止,我国已有四宗确诊新型冠状病毒病例,卫生部是在本月23日公布首宗病例,患者来自中国武汉。 邻国马来西亚是在本月25日,确认在柔佛州出现共四宗病例。其中三人与上述新加坡首宗确诊病例有亲属关系。三人是病患的妻子,和两名分别为两岁及11岁男孙。 他们一行10人在本月20日,从广州乘机飞抵新加坡渡假。之后66岁病患和儿子在本地确诊患武汉肺炎。 据了解有马国民众在网络发起联署,要求马国政府立即禁止中国公民入境马国,避免武汉肺炎散播。 截至今午(27日),该联署已累积超过36万9千网民参与联署。 据发起联署的请愿人莫哈末依占声称,马国政府应顾虑到民众的健康,别等到有民众死亡政府才采取措施。 迄今为止,包括新、马、越南,以及香港、日本、韩国、泰国、澳门、美国、法国等地都以有确诊新型冠状病毒病例。

调整就业准证政策 杨莉明辩称无关近期选举结果

昨日(8月27日),人力部终于宣布调高就业准证和S准证薪金门槛。人力部长杨莉明也重申,企业需努力建立和保留新加坡人核心,特别是在当前(冠病疫情)的氛围下,尤为关键。 有媒体记者就质问,人力部宣布上述针对外籍雇员准证的举措,是否是基于政治考量呢?对此杨莉明予以否认。 她也指出,一些人会把政府在上述政策的转变,归因于近期的选举结果,为此她反驳,实则是因为从今年第一份财案至今,我国经济情况已出现巨大改变,而且局势还在变化,就业市场已出现疲软。 杨莉明也辩称,若政府为了避嫌,选择现在不采取行动,“等到半年后(2021年财案)才行动,难道这是为国人着想吗?我想答案肯定不是。” 2020大选被视作新加坡政治的分水岭,其中最关键的里程碑为,除了少数选区,人民行动党在大多数选区中的选票率有所下降。总选票率比起2015年的69.9巴仙,下降到2020 仅剩61.2巴仙。 即便行动党秘书长兼新加坡总理李显龙也坦言,对行动党来说结果不尽理想,惟“虚心接受人民赋予的重任”。 事实上,本地雇员特别是PMET群体面对被减薪、裁员的问题,已到了刻不容缓的地步,不少公司已开始裁员(例如近期的新达新加坡和新航工程合资公司等)。企业有没有公平对待本地求职者亦成为民众关注的热门议题之一。 近期一些被裁的案例,还包括已怀胎的准妈妈,以为自己能保住饭碗仍不幸被裁;有者投了80份履历,工作仍没着落!遗憾的是,仍有雇主宣称在新加坡找不到合适的本地人才。

SDP calls for inquiry into 14-year-old Benjamin Lim's case

In a press release issued today by the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP),…