Lee

Lee Hsien Loong pap60 party rallyIn a surprising disclosure in Parliament on Monday, 13 July, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said the Electoral Boundary Review Committee (EBRC) was formed two months ago.

PM Lee also said the committee is currently in deliberation and will submit its report when it has completed its review.

Mr Lee has instructed the committee to reduce the average size of the Group Representation Constituency (GRC) to 5, and to have at least 12 single-member constituencies (SMCs).

Member of Parliament, Arthur Fong (PAP), and non-constituency MP Yee Jenn Jon (WP), had filed the questions asking PM Lee if the committee has been formed.

The Committee normally publishes an updated list of electoral divisions just before elections are called, and is appointed by the Prime Minister.

Mr Yee also wanted to know who the committee members are, when its report is expected to be published, and how much time will elapse between the report’s publication and the calling of an election.In an interview with the Straits Times, Mr Fong said that it was “natural to ask the question” and he also added that he intends to ask Parliament what guidelines the committee would follow.

He also told media that the government should make it a point to announce the panel’s formation, so Singaporeans and those in the political scene can have a better idea of when the polls will be held.

The next general election must be held by January 2017.

“As per past practice, the Committee is chaired by the Secretary to Prime Minister. It is now in the midst of its deliberations and will make its recommendations to me when it is ready,” Mr Lee told Parliament.

In a TODAY newspaper report in January, Mr Lee was reported thus:

“Hinting that the next General Election could be some time away, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said the Government has not had time to think about setting up the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee – often seen as one of the final steps in the run-up to polls.

The next GE must be held by January 2017. Speaking to the Chinese media in an interview on Thursday, Mr Lee said the Government is preoccupied with the SG50 celebrations this year and hence, has had no time to think about when to set up the committee. “When it’s set up, everyone will know,” he added.”

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

NEA reports dengue cases are at a four-year high

On Tuesday, the National Environment Agency (NEA) reported on its official site…

彭博社揭露:波音软件外包给时薪仅9美元印度工程师

《彭博社》一则报导揭露,比起每小时35至40美元的正职美国软件工程师,波音737Max把软体系统外包给每小时仅9美元低薪的印度软件工程师。 此外,彭博社也发现波音的分包商与供应商均将工程外包到印度,降低成本以保证利益最大化。 资深波音工程师向彭博社透露面对种种弊病的波音公司内幕。 他指波音公司将内部的工程师裁员,然后压低供应商的成本。这迫使他们寻求外包给更低价的承包商。结果,这些工作往往推给缺乏航空业背景国家(如印度)的临工承担,他们以每小时9美元的低薪负责研发和测试系统。 彭博社在调查期间也发现,两家与737Max软件系统发展有关的印度软件系统公司,是HCL和Cyient。前任波音软件工程师也表示,HCL 的程式工程师通常需要基于原有的波音班机设计而重新调整。 然而,这仍然存在争议,因为这比起由波音内部工程师写编程更缺乏效率。通常这工作需要来来回回的磨合,因为其编码与原先的设计并不相符。 另一名前波音研发飞行控制的工程师亦透露,“波音公司为了要减低成本,真的会做一切事情,一切你可以想象得到的事,包括将普吉特海湾所有的工程迁移,因为我们变得非常昂贵。你可以站在生意的角度出发,想象一切合理的事情。这些迁移渐渐地侵蚀在普吉特海湾工作的设计师的能力。” 彭博社指出,外包工程一直都是波音工程師的心病,长期下来他们一直担心失去工作的可能,而他们认为是外包工程导致各种飞行沟通失误的主因。 波音公司辩称并未将功成外包 为此,波音公司回应彭博社的调查,表示他们并没有依赖如HCL和Cyient的公司研发“机动特性增强系统”(MCAS)。 波音公司辩称,如狮子航空和衣索比亚航空的意外也并不是因为另一個软件问题所引起:大部分的波音其驾驶舱内的警示灯并未显示。…

民航局下令今午二时起 暂停波音737 Max8客机起降

不到五个月内,发生两起波音737 MAX8客机坠毁事件,为安全起见,新加坡民航局(CAAS)决定从今日下午2时起,暂停737 MAX所有型號客机在新加坡机场的起降。 新加坡民航局今日发表文告宣佈,新加坡航空公司旗下的胜安航空公司,將受暂停令的影响。 停飞令也对在新加坡运行、拥有波音737 MAX客机的航空公司:中国南方航空、印尼的嘉鲁达航空(Garuda Indonesia)、山东航空(Shandong Airlines)和泰国狮航(Thai Lion Air)有效。 文告称,民航局和樟宜机场集团,將与这些航空公司合作,将乘客受到的影响减至最低。 民航局也会在客机停飞期间,收集更多资料,以评估使用这款客机的安全风险。…

“棉花出在羊身上?” 陈振声口误称我国没足够绵羊生产棉花

“棉花出在羊身上”? 贸工部长陈振声在一项视讯记者会上,在发言时出现口误。当谈及有关新加坡口罩生产的问题时,他指出新加坡无法生产医疗口罩所有的部分,例如我们没有足够绵羊出产棉花(“don’t have too many sheep in Singapore to produce cotton”)。 在访谈中,他提到医疗口罩有六个部分,但我国无法生产所有的部分,“我们没有绵羊生产棉花、不织布可在裕廊岛生产,但制造不织布所需的石化产品、具防水特质的疏水性表层、橡胶圈等,则来自其他地方。”…