state court entrance

Gabriel Ravi Janageran was found guilty of 14 counts of parking offences – such as parking in a place other than a parking lot, one count of parking in a season parking place, one count of obstructive parking and one count of parking with expired coupons.

Earlier this month, the courts fined him $7,000, after Mr Gabriel pleaded guilty to the charges.

The offences, which come under the Parking Places Act, were committed between 2011 and 2014.

In court, the judge said that in normal cases, the penalty would be a fine of between $600 to $800 for each of the offences. If the accused was unable to pay the fines, he would have to serve jail time which would be between 2 to 4 days.

For Mr Gabriel’s offences, the judge issued a penalty of $500 for each count, totalling $7,000.

Mr Gabriel, who conducted his own mitigation plea, is unable to pay the fine, and is appealing it.

He is currently out on bail.

Mr Gabriel is a father of four and works two jobs to make ends meet. He is the sole breadwinner in the family.

He had asked the judge to be lenient and to impose only a small fine. But this was declined by the judge who said that Mr Gabriel’s financial situation is not unique and therefore does not warrant special considerations.

Mr Gabriel too had been given many extensions during his court case to allow him time to raise money to pay the fines.

It was the Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) and the Housing and Development Board (HDB) which had hauled Mr Gabriel to court.

According to lawyers whom the Chinese newspapers spoke to, it is rare for anyone to be charged in court for such traffic offences.

A first-time offender would normally be allowed to pay a composite fine and the case closed.

Alternatively, offenders could also be issued warning letters.

However, lawyers say, in the case of repeat offenders, the authorities would take more stringent measures.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

涉嫌桃色欺诈案 8青少年遭逮捕

警方正在调查八名青少年,怀疑他们涉嫌桃色诈骗案。 警方昨日发文告指出,在2020年1月21日至4月24日期间,接到多宗受害者投报,据称他们都是在回应网上的桃色广告后,被迫付款。 经过调查,兀兰警察分局确定了嫌犯身份。 初步调查显示,八名嫌犯年龄介于16至21岁,至少涉嫌了五起桃色欺诈案件,涉及金额已经超过700元。 目前案件尚在调查中,怀疑他们涉及欺诈和洗钱罪。 据《刑事法典》第420条例,欺诈罪名一旦成立,犯人可面对不超过10年的监刑以及罚款。而在贪污、贩毒和其他严重罪案(没收利益)法令下,罪犯可被判入狱不超过10年,或罚款不超过50万元,或两者兼施。

三官委议员坚持立场力争修《防假消息法》遭否决

5月8日,《防止网络假信息和网络操纵法案》在国会经过两天、超过13小时的马拉松辩论,最终以72赞成票、九张反对票、三张弃权票,三读通过。共有七名部长和次长、31名议员参与相关辩论,其中三名官委议员:王丽婷、特斯拉和郭秀钦,争取通过他们的修法建议但遭否决,在三读时投弃权票。 在辩论进行时,王丽婷数度提出《防假信息法》的修改建议,包括了要求部长们保证能够更加严格看待修正建议、将部长和政府的权限写入法案主体中、要求设立独立的理事会监督执法、还有上诉程序中的缺陷等等。 他们也呼吁政府修改法案中,对“事实”和“不真实信息”的定义,因为目前的定义仍然太过宽泛和主观。 在针对上诉程序中,三人建议在法案中加入一个阐明更多立法原则的条文,并且建议上诉程序必须迅速且成本低。惟,但是尚穆根对此建议表示不认同,他认为三人提出的原则过于宽泛,与之相比,政府反而给出了更具体的时间表。 三人多数建议中,有些在第二次辩论中就已经不被采纳,因此他们决定弃权。 特斯拉更是数度要求国会秘书将有关的弃权票数记录在案。 间中,工人党党魁毕丹星也曾经一度站起来发言,表示对于他们之前不被采纳的建议,每一条都投弃权票。(工人党立场是反对《防假消息法》) 工人党议员之前曾表示,法案将导致寒蝉效应,严重影响人们言论自由。 网民评论有褒有贬 三名官委议员的表现,在《网络公民》脸书专页上载后,网民反应有褒有贬。有人按赞,为三人的表现鼓掌,有人感到无奈,也有人觉得力量不足。 有网民对他们的表现感到敬佩,甚至称赞他们为勇敢的火枪手(brave musketeers)。…

Former NMP Calvin Cheng decries advisory by senior medical practitioners as nonsense

The advice given by four medical practitioners in Singapore encouraging the public…

YPAP budget forum: Not much sense?

by Leong Sze Hian I refer to the remarks made at the…