state court entrance

Gabriel Ravi Janageran was found guilty of 14 counts of parking offences – such as parking in a place other than a parking lot, one count of parking in a season parking place, one count of obstructive parking and one count of parking with expired coupons.

Earlier this month, the courts fined him $7,000, after Mr Gabriel pleaded guilty to the charges.

The offences, which come under the Parking Places Act, were committed between 2011 and 2014.

In court, the judge said that in normal cases, the penalty would be a fine of between $600 to $800 for each of the offences. If the accused was unable to pay the fines, he would have to serve jail time which would be between 2 to 4 days.

For Mr Gabriel’s offences, the judge issued a penalty of $500 for each count, totalling $7,000.

Mr Gabriel, who conducted his own mitigation plea, is unable to pay the fine, and is appealing it.

He is currently out on bail.

Mr Gabriel is a father of four and works two jobs to make ends meet. He is the sole breadwinner in the family.

He had asked the judge to be lenient and to impose only a small fine. But this was declined by the judge who said that Mr Gabriel’s financial situation is not unique and therefore does not warrant special considerations.

Mr Gabriel too had been given many extensions during his court case to allow him time to raise money to pay the fines.

It was the Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) and the Housing and Development Board (HDB) which had hauled Mr Gabriel to court.

According to lawyers whom the Chinese newspapers spoke to, it is rare for anyone to be charged in court for such traffic offences.

A first-time offender would normally be allowed to pay a composite fine and the case closed.

Alternatively, offenders could also be issued warning letters.

However, lawyers say, in the case of repeat offenders, the authorities would take more stringent measures.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

错把讽刺也当作假消息,媒体通识理事会致歉

媒体通识理事会(Media Literacy Council,简称MLC),日前在网络上贴出一则分辨假新闻的宣传图,图内其中一项指标指的是讽刺(satire),引起各界议论。MLC已于周日(8日)在脸书上致歉。 MLC于致歉文内表示,该宣传图旨在提高年轻人和公众对假消息的警觉,鼓励读者要先理解消息来源与确认内容的真实性,才会制图以简单明了的方式,向大家解释。 “我们承认帖文和宣传图的内容有关”讽刺“的资讯,实属误会。我们对制造的混肴而感到抱歉,并会重新审视内容”,MLC表示。 MLC是2012年成立,旨在向公众倡导有关媒体素养与网络健康,同时也提供政府有关网络、科技与消费者参与的相关政策建议。 有关宣传图是在上周四(5日)被刊登在网上,其指标共6种包括虚假内容、冒名内容、含有操纵意味的内容、含有误导内容、标题党和讽刺(satire) ,均为假消息的指标。其中最引人议论的就是“讽刺”的指标。 尽管宣传图已撤下,但依然被热烈讨论。NUSSU – NUS的脸书专页仍保留截图并在凸显MLC所指的“讽刺”内容与内政部兼律政部长尚穆根此前说法有所出入。 NUSSU…

PUB’s Cuscaden Road misinformation?

In her commentary piece of 13 Jun 2011, headed, “ Plumb depths…

Facebook's new app "Lookback" to celebrate tenth anniversary

Post by Facebook.   In a Facebook post marking the 10th Anniversary…

SPP candidates for Bishan-Toa Payoh GRC have taken their oath to be nominated for candidacy

Singapore People’s Party (SPP) candidates for Bishan-Toa Payoh GRC have finished taking…