supreme court

Ministry of National Development (MND) has commenced legal proceeding against Aljunied-Hougang-Punggol East Town Council  (AHPETC) through the Attorney General Chambers (AGC) to seek to impose conditions onto grants disbursed to the town council and to have the court to appoint independent auditors to the town council.

In its originating summons, MND declared that it has a legal or equitable interest in the grants-in-aid disbursed or to be disbursed by MND to AHPETC or its predecessor, AHTC to ensure that to recover payment that are not properly authorised or lawfully made and to take appropriate action against any person action for AHPETC if there has been any breach of duty or unlawful conduct.

The proposed independent auditors by MND will co-authorise and co-sign all payments in excess of S$20,000 from segregated bank accounts established by AHPETC and grants payable for financial years 2014/15 and 2015/16 from MND and to oversee the payments to ensure all proposed payments out of the special accounts are correctly made and properly authorised.

Apart from the above, the independent auditors will also identify whether the payments made by AHPETC have been correctly made. With the leave of court, the independent auditors will demand and collect for the recovery of town council money which are incorrectly paid out and also take appropriate actions in the event if breach(es) of duties or unlawful conduct by individuals are found.

AHPETC chairman Sylvia Lim earlier said to media, “As the case is now before the courts, I do not think it is appropriate for me to make any comments … We will be mounting a vigorous defence and doing this in the interest of the residents. We believe this court case is wholly unnecessary,” .

In the hearing, AGC repeated the findings on the APHETC’s financial report produced by the Attorney General Officer (AGO) in February 2015. AGC pointed out that while AGO did not highlight any fault, the AGO’s report was not meant to find contraventions or wrong doing in the town council’s financial processes and items set out in the originating summons filed by MND are sought to do that.

Towards assertion by AHPETC that this legal proceeding is one of a political nature, AGC stated that the proceeding by MND is not of a political dispute as all town councils are required to fulfill their statutory obligations through the town council act and not a matter between People’s Action Party and Worker’s Party.

During the hearing, the presiding judge, Justice Quentin Loh asked AGC if there was any preceding case where the court appoints an independent auditor into a company to oversee the operations of the company.

In response to the judge’s question, AGC presented a case where the court appointed independent auditors to a company which had been proven to have issues in the business, to ensure that the operations are proper.

The judge also asked if the appointment of the independent auditors to the town council would mean that the auditors would be able to gain access to information from third party, such as FM Solution and Services (FMSS) and FM Solutions and Integrated Services (FMSI) through the court. The AGC said yes.

The hearing will continue in the afternoon and carry on to Tuesday at the Supreme Court. Members of public can attend the public hearing.

Subscribe
Notify of
6 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

China suspends all 737 MAX 8 aircraft operations while SilkAir continues to fly theirs after 2nd crash

Yesterday (Mar 10), 157 passengers and crew members of a 737 MAX…

Research highlights leadership gap in Singapore

Singapore – 7 JANUARY, 2014 – Global talent solutions company, Hudson today…

Duo from The Real Singapore arrested under Sedition Act

Two persons from The Real Singapore (TRS) have been arrested and investigated by…

尚拖欠用户押金 oBike转账1千万元到香港账户

无桩脚车出租公司oBike将1千万元款项汇到香港账户,清盘公司正尝试索回这笔款项,以期归给新加坡的债权人。 oBike公司共向用户收取了1千170万新元的抵押金和充值,其中有130万用来支付本地运营费用、40万元在清盘时退还给用户,但其中的1千万新元却被作为预付款项(pre-payment),汇到oBike香港账户。 oBike香港在公司宣布推出新加坡市场的一个月前,声称用1千万元购买了7万辆脚车。前者即以上述1千万元抵消公司买脚车的费用。 仍有22万500名用户,还未收到他们的退款,涉及数额890万新元。 在昨日(8月2日)举行的债权人大会,oBike临时清盘人富理诚咨询有限公司(FTI Consulting)获推举为正式清盘人,该公司向现场30多名用户和物流业者报告oBike公司清盘进展。 “转账到香港账户不恰当” 富理诚公司代表约书亚泰勒直言,oBike公司把1千万元作为“预付款项”转到香港账户的做法不恰当,也相信有关款项并不是买脚车的费用,因有另一独立账户记录,购买脚车的拨款。 他说,oBike公司无权抵消预付款项和贷款账户。清盘公司将向oBike香港索回上述款项。后者提议只归还35万新元,清盘公司认为“无法接受。” oBike公司创办人之一石一,曾承诺会全额归还所有用户抵押金。泰勒表示,他们将向oBike香港和石一发出索偿信函。 石一在oBike Global有23巴仙股份,总值100多万美元。…