tcj
In Parliament on Tuesday, Minister of Manpower Tan Chuan Jin explained the reasons behind the CPF scheme, and in particular the Minimum Sum (MS) scheme.
He said that in Singapore, “assurance in old age revolves around a few key considerations: healthcare, housing and retirement needs.”
“The CPF,” he said, “is our key pillar in the social security system. It is a mandatory savings account that helps us put aside money today to cover our needs in old age.”
He explained that the reason why the MS has been raised since the scheme’s introduction – this, he said, was because of an increasing life span.
“When the CPF was first introduced almost 60 years ago, members could withdraw their money at age 55 in a lump sum. That was because at that time, someone could expect to live only another six to seven years after that.”
“The situation is very different today where one could expect to live a further 30 years or more. Allowing a full withdrawal from CPF at age 55 will put us at real risk of outliving our savings in old age.”
Mr Tan added: “To blindly keep to the earlier model of full withdrawal at age 55 would be wrong and irresponsible.”
He then explained that “if you do not meet your Minimum Sum at 55, you do not need to top up the shortfall in cash nor do you need to sell your property to make up the shortfall.”
“Only half of the Minimum Sum needs to be set aside in cash. The savings above that amount can be used to finance housing purchases, or be withdrawn through a property pledge,” he said.
“This means a member turning 55 this year only needs to set aside $77,500 in cash and the rest can be withdrawn through a property pledge.”

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

First Singaporean woman imprisoned under ISA for radicalism released with restrictions

Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) announced on Tuesday (25 June) that Syaikhah…

Govt repeats: families with S$1,000 income can afford HDB flats

When Deputy Prime Minister and Finance Minister, Tharman Shanmugaratnam, said in Parliament…

日做18小时午夜要照顾女婴 印尼女佣掐死女婴判误杀罪监七年

每日几乎做18小时,午夜还得照顾一岁女婴,一名印尼籍女佣,在两年前为阻止雇主女婴哭闹,一时恼火掐死女婴,被高庭判误杀罪,坐牢七年。 据昨日《联合早报》报导,称名案发生于2016年5月8日凌晨2时,在四美第225座组屋某单位,被告当时在该单位为一户张姓人家打工,死者是年仅一岁的女婴张妍嘉(洋名Richelle)。 24岁的被告自2015年1月起到张家打工,除了做家务,也负责照顾张家一对儿女,分别是三岁大男童及当时刚出生的女婴。 曾申诉工作辛苦、禁用手机,三次要求换雇主 开始工作约四个月后,被告就向中介要求换雇主,或把她送回印尼,前后要求了三次。被告称工作辛苦,整天被女雇主骂和被嫌弃做得不好。 女雇主也不准被告使用手机,被告两次偷偷找人帮忙买手机,结果两次都被女雇主发现并没收。 案发前一个月,女佣第三次要求离职,女雇主原本答应,但考虑到家婆无法照顾孩子后改变主意。 每天清洗一次壁橱 同一期间,女佣的工作量也增加,单是清洗壁橱就从每周一次改成每天一次。 案发当晚午夜时分,被告忙完一堆家务后开始入睡,和女婴在同一张床上就寝。不久后,女婴摔下床嚎啕大哭,被告抱起女婴安抚了一会儿就继续睡觉。 凌晨2时,女婴的哭声把被告吵醒,她起身喂奶,但女婴吐奶还越哭越大声。疲惫被告越发生气,她用力揍女婴的脖子尝试阻止她哭,同时把对女雇主的不满发泄在女婴身上。 但女婴仍不停哭泣,恼火的被告于是用左手抓住女婴脖子,右手猛压在脖子左侧,直至半小时后,女婴双眼紧闭,不再出声,被告才松手回去睡觉。…