daniel gohAssociate Professor at the Department of Sociology, National University of Singapore and Member of Workers’ Party, Mr Daniel Goh shared his views on the Health Promotion Board (HPB)’s FAQ saga through his facebook page. Answering in his professional capacity as a sociologist, he replied the questions posed by journalist and shared the answers on his facebook as a status update.
Daniel Goh’s reply, with questions abbreviated and paraphrased:
1) What do you think of the FAQs?
I think the FAQs are very factual and reflect the current social scientific and scientific understanding of homosexuality. I don’t find it surprising at all and not progressive, but objective.
2) What do you make of the timing of this?
I am wondering what took so long. I believe government agencies should operate on the basis of facts and not the prejudices of society whichever way they bend. I think it would be speculation to interpret the timing of the FAQs as linked to society’s views and prejudices.
If anything, I think society has become quite pluralistic when it comes to sexuality and a whole range of views exist. If government agencies adopt the point of view of a particular segment, it will just produce or exacerbate conflicts and misunderstandings. Agencies should go by facts, which is what HPB is doing.
3) Do you think the FAQs reflect or contradict the government’s pro-family policy?
I don’t see any contradiction. Informing people about concerns and facts about homosexuality is to acknowledge the incontrovertible reality of homosexuality. It doesn’t undermine healthy relationships between married heterosexual couples at all. If it offends someone’s individual sensibility, then it is just that, offending an individual, not hurting a relationship between two heterosexual partners.
In fact, I think informing people about homosexuals actually helps promote the family as a basic building block of society, as it helps parents and other family members understand and accept homosexuality as a fact. This reduces discord and strengthens family bonds, making for a stronger society where homosexuals do not feel ostracized and alienated through no fault of their own.
4) Do you think the FAQs achieve the goal of STD education?
I think it does, because it helps clarifies misperception that AIDS is a homosexual disease, and directs our understanding of STDs as linked to risky sexual behavior of having unprotected sex with multiple partners regardless of sexual orientation.
The only criticism I have is the factoid on the increase in homosexuals being tested positive for HIV. The increase was only in 2011 and HPB should be more circumspect and not appear to frame it as a trend — we don’t know yet until more data is available. Overall, I like the FAQs very much and am very impressed by HPB’s clarity and balanced objectivity.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

【选举】李显扬和陈清木 一同攻打丹戎巴葛?

新加坡前进党在本周在政坛抛下震撼弹,宣布建国总理李光耀次子李显扬已入党。更巧妙的是,该党秘书长陈清木医生,选择在中峇鲁巴刹这个地方,移交党员证给后者。 中峇鲁就位在丹戎巴葛选区,过去就是由时任内阁资政的李光耀领军,目前由贸工部长陈振声等人镇守。 而在明日(27日)晚上8时,前进党将直播主题为“回家:丹戎巴葛的故事”线上演说。该党形容,丹戎巴葛如同新加坡的缩影,是新加坡发展的中心点、也是该党许多成员,包括陈清木成长的地方,欢迎民众一同来聆听和分享人在丹戎巴葛的往事回忆。 对于李显扬会否在本届选举上阵,尽管早前陈清木卖关子不愿透露,惟坊间已在揣测,他俩会否一同攻打丹戎巴葛集选区?再者该选区对李显扬也具有显著意义,在父亲过去的选区上阵,能否争取更多选民的响应? 迄今,行动党似乎仍未公布该党在丹戎巴葛的候选人,似乎仍在观望对手布局。  

5 sites for TOC GE news

Hi everyone, So, the big day is tomorrow – NOMINATION DAY. As…

AVA: Revised licensing conditions for pet shops and pet farms

The Agri-Food and Veterinary Authority of Singapore (AVA) has announced a revision…

港示威者闯入立法会 林郑月娥凌晨四时开记者会

香港一批示威者昨晚近九时成功破坏立法会大楼闸门,闯入大堂。 原本香港警方在闸门另一头驻守,与示威者对峙。不过在示威者闯入前却突然撤走。而后警方在脸书发布短片,谴责示威者占据和破坏立法会,发出警告。并表示将到现场进行清场,如遇阻碍或抵抗,将采取适当武力。 昨日是香港回归中国22周年,在昨早香港政府举办22周年主权移交纪念升旗仪式,而反对《逃犯条例》修法的示威者,则发起“七一游行”,也齐聚升旗场地外游行抗议。 期间有示威者和警方再次爆发冲突。而其中一批示威者,则在下午约1时许试图冲击立法会,即便有议员在现场劝阻也不听。 没有警方驻守下,在昨晚9时成功打开闸门的示威者进入立法会会议厅,有者在墙上涂鸦,并写上“太阳花”、“释放义士”、“反送中”、“真普选”等字眼,甚至涂鸦会议厅香港区徽和历任立法会主席肖像。 在视频中可见有示威者试图把香港殖民时代旗帜覆盖在港特区区徽之上。 游行人士对占领立法会意见两极化 据了解,也有和平游行人士不认同示威者占领立法会,认为此举反而让建制派有借口谴责“反送中”抗争,让警方有借口把事件定义为“暴动”。 至于占领立法会后的示威者此后则讨论是否继续留守,最终决定在警方返回清场前撤离。原本有数位“义士”坚持留下,不过最终被示威者们劝离,因为担心“以后再见不到他们”。 https://youtu.be/6p84g3_EFqI 警方凌晨12时清场 警方在凌晨12是开始在立法会附近道路驱散示威者和投放催泪弹。不过当警方重新返回立法会时,现场只留下记者和议员,示威者们早已全数离开。…