This is AWARE’s official press release for its recommendations regarding the upcoming Budget 2014.
On 29 January, AWARE (Association of Women for Action and Research) submitted its fourth annual set of recommendations for the national budget through the public consultation portal REACH. This year it questioned some of the fundamental approaches that underlie budget making and call for the budget process to be more transparent and inclusive, so that citizens and civil society organisations can have a greater stake in building an inclusive nation. Its recommendations have also been sent to Members and Nominated Members of Parliament.

This year, its nine recommendations cover five key areas:
1.Fundamental approaches to the Budget
2.Income inequality and poverty
3.Caregiving
4.Healthcare
5.The Budget Process
There is a need for Singaporeans to debate the fundamental approaches included in the budget. There is also a need for the Government, the citizens and the corporate sector to work together to come up with more inclusive solutions. For example, AWARE asks: Is social spending too low in Singapore? Should children be advantaged or disadvantaged based on their parents’ choices in employment or marriage? Do policies require too much “self-reliance” from individuals in contexts where problems cannot be effectively addressed at the individual level? Should means-testing take the income of all family members into account, rather than the income of the individual concerned? These questions need careful consideration and a more open discussion.
More needs to be done to tackle income inequality and poverty
Income inequality in Singapore is growing. Even after Government transfers and taxes, Singapore’s Gini coefficient rose from 0.448 in 2011 to 0.452 in 2012. More effective measures must be taken to lower the Gini coefficient below 0.4, which is the international alert line for the inequality threshold.
Social protection spending in Singapore is far below what it should be for a high-income economy. According to the Asian Development Bank (2013), Singapore’s Social Protection Index (SPI – a simple indicator assessing social protection programmes) is a mere 0.169, with social protection spending taking up only 3.5% of GDP. For comparison, the Republic of Korea, with per capita GDP less than half that of Singapore, has an SPI of 0.2, with 7.9% of GDP allocated to social protection spending. This places vulnerable groups in Singapore at severe financial risk, especially the elderly, women who drop out of the workforce, and disabled persons.
A yearly, regular and reliable poverty measurement should be produced to enable citizens to track the extent to which poverty is reduced by various “tailored schemes”. There should be transparent evaluation of whether the Multiple Lines of Assistance 1 in the Ministry of Social and Family Development effectively address the needs of the poorest and most vulnerable.
Caregiving must be valued and caregivers protected
Rapidly changing family forms and social structures require recognition in public policy if they are not to leave caregivers vulnerable. Policies that support children should be delinked from those supporting caregivers. No child should be penalised for parents’ personal choices in employment or marriage.
AWARE would also like to see the provision of caregiving services as a public good, with significant investments in childcare and eldercare as publicly funded services.
Universal healthcare must be a priority
For many years, the healthcare policy has treated healthcare as a financial issue, with the responsibility to afford healthcare wholly resting on the patients and her/his family. AWARE hopes that with the ‘Healthcare 2020 Masterplan’, the limitations of this policy will become more apparent. With this, improvements can be made after recognizing the concerns of the policy.
Singaporeans currently pay 75% out-of-pocket for healthcare expenditure. This should be lowered significantly to ease the burden on those unable to finance their healthcare. Key questions about the future of the healthcare system must be discussed with stakeholders openly and transparently.
A more transparent Budget process means better feedback from the public. AWARE strongly calls for the Budget process to be more transparent and inclusive. Public consultation on the Budget through REACH must be continuous to allow citizens and civil society organisations to contribute effectively at all stages. AWARE asks the Ministry of Finance to publish key budget documents in accordance with international best practice, including a pre-budget statement, detailed breakdown of the budget for the financial year, in-year reports, mid-year review, and an annual report detailing the spending of individual ministries. Data, disaggregated by gender, age, ethnicity and income, should be made available to all citizens.
To read the entire 2014 AWARE’s Budget recommendation, go here
The Budget for 2014 will be released on the 21st of February

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

And the winner of the 2009 MM Award is…

This minister made some of the most insensitive remarks in recent times.

Thousands of Burmese flee into China

Ethnic Chinese refugees camp on the border with Myanmar to escape fighting…

Police queried on 4-year old case involving ex-YPAP member

A member of the public has posted a query with the Singapore…

苏睿勇拒绝调停献议 要求田径总会道歉

马拉松名将苏睿勇拒绝新加坡田径总会提出的调停会面献议,并点名后者撤回言论,并发书面道歉。 田径总会于周二(13日)透过律师回复苏睿勇,要求调停纷争,提议双方会面进行协商,然而苏睿勇于昨日(14日)拒绝田总的提议,表明田总尚未针对“暂时封锁所有与他的联系”进行澄清。 “直至田总针对评论提出实质性的回应,我们的客户(苏睿勇)才会考虑和田总会面,相信到时的会面会更具有意义和富有成果。” 苏睿勇的律师代表回应。 对此,《海峡时报》记者询问苏睿勇,后者表示只有在田总和奥委会给出回应,他才会接受调停。他表示,“如果你公开指责某人,你要么提出实质证据,要么道歉(若没有根据),你不会在公开对某人人格谋杀,在造成伤害后要求和对方关起门来默默地处理事情。只有在田总和其执行董事解释所有缘由,方能进行调停。” 今日(15日)苏睿勇也转贴《海峡时报》报道,促请田径总会与其执行董事Malik Aljunied出面解释。 苏睿勇近日因东南亚运动会落选而与新加坡国家奥林匹克委员会(SNOC),以及新加坡田径总会(SA)争执,奥委会指出苏睿勇作为国家代表和青年运动员的典范,却表现出“不符合该委会期望的态度和行为”,同时新加坡田径总会表示已“暂时”把苏睿勇封锁在总会的聊天群组和社媒平台外,包括whatsapp、脸书、推特和Instagram等,避免后者在这些平台发文,带来负面影响。 对此,苏睿勇于8月7日向两协会发律师信函,指控他们在未举办任何听证会或给他辩护的机会, 并要求两人于8月13日下午5点前给出具体解释,详细解释“行为失当”的指控 翌日,奥委会透过律师回复苏睿勇并向苏睿勇提出两项要求:1. 他们将在“下周结束前“回复苏睿勇的问题;2.…