By Terry Xu

Singapore has its first victim in the current dengue fever epidemic. The victim was a 20-year-old Singaporean Chinese male who was seen at Tan  Tock Seng Hospital’s (TTSH) emergency department (ED) on 23 May and diagnosed as having viral fever. He was sent home after being given a drip by the hospital as reported by Straits Times. He was also asked to visit an outpatient clinic for follow up and a repeat blood test.

Straits Times also reported that Mr Ang went back to the hospital during the wee hours of Friday, 24th May after hitting as high as 39.5 degrees Celsius. He waited for five hours at the hospital before going to a general practitioner near his home according to Mr Ang’s mother. Mr Ang was eventually admitted to TTSH on Saturday night.

According to the joint statement by MOH and NEA, the patient subsequently returned to TTSH’s ED on 26 May and was admitted as a dengue case. During admission, his condition deteriorated despite medical interventions, and he passed away on 29 May.

MOH and NEA joint statement on 30th May 2013 while accounting for the death of the dengue fever victim, emphasized more on the urgency for greater community vigilance to stamp out possible mosquito breeding spots and promising more control operations at the vicinity of the case’s residence.

“MOH and NEA wish to express our deepest condolences to the family of the  deceased patient. We strongly encourage all Singaporeans to take appropriate precautions to prevent mosquito breeding by doing the Mozzie Wipeout weekly.”

It is pretty surprising that no one asked about or accounted for the statement by Mr Ang’s mother that this patient was allowed to wait for 5 hours  on last Friday, 24th May before he made the decision to leave to consult a general practicioner and being re-admitted to the hospital the day after.

Questions like why wasn’t Mr Ang being diagnosed with dengue fever during the first consultation? Given that more than 8,000 people have come down with dengue fever since the start of the year, why given the current dengue fever epidemic that fever patients are not given special attention? Why Mr Ang wasn’t asked to stay longer on 23th May to observe for signs of dengue fever if he has not been diagnosed with one?

MOH has chosen to push the issue to the dengue fever epidemic in its statement but in light of Mr Ang being made to seek private medical consultation after a 5 hours wait in his condition,it seems that the hospital’s response to the current epidemic is something that the public would probably want answers from.

Is waiting time up to five hours or more so common that it is no longer required to explain for the long wait that patients with serious illness or conditions are subjected to? Is there enough beds in the hospital where patients can stay to be observed by the medical professionals? Would MOH care to explain?

Would also wish to extend sincere condolences to the family members of Mr Ang on their loss of a beloved family member.

You May Also Like

Budget 2021: Petrol duty increases by up to 15 cents per litre, effective from today

The Government will increase petrol duty rates by 15 cents per litre…

Shocking that PM Lee kept appointment of EBRC from public: SDP

The Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) on Monday said it was “shocking” that…

涉去年9月收容所骚乱 三少年认纠众闹事罪

去年9月,新加坡男童收容所发生骚乱事件,其中有三名17岁少年前日在法庭承认参与一项纠众闹事,以及两项破坏公物罪名。 他们也是第一批在法院因参与收容所骚乱事件而被定罪的人士。肇事者为被囚禁的11名少年,他们年龄介于14岁至17岁。 基于涉事者仍未成年,法官下令媒体不得报导名字,保护他们身份。(以下用甲、乙、丙化名) 至于上述认罪的三名少年,因曾犯下偷窃,去年被送到裕廊西24街的男童收容所。9月26日,他们与感化院另一批少年发生争吵,结果被关禁闭一整天,也不能离开宿舍去上课。 他们不满惩处,而开始谋划要“造反”,不过在傍晚时被告知门禁解除。 不过在9月28日,其中一名少年聚集其他人,包括上述三名认罪少年,仍要进行破坏计划,并约定在集合的时间发作。 在当天下午5时50分,指挥官召集大家集合,而少年甲假装和另一15岁的男孩打架,指挥官就趋前劝架,殊不知被那位15岁男孩拳击打脸,其余闹事少年便乘机攻击指挥官。 助理经理和辅警见状赶来援助,结果也被少年殴打。 检控官指少年丙用地钩球棒攻击助理经理的背部和头部;甲也数次用球棒攻击辅警头部,迫使这三位大人逃离现场。 至于闹事少年则乘机毁坏感化院内的家具财物,包括电视机、书架等等。 随后警察赶来,甚至动员约50名警员,全副武装以防暴装备严正以待。 检控官指,当警察到来时,这些少年还大声唱歌等警察逮捕。…

刘浩典:从新冠疫情危机,新加坡能吸取什么教训?

李光耀公共政策研究院前副院长刘浩典教授,本月16日在《南华早报》发表评论。他认为新加坡政府做了三个重要、且事后看来是错误的决策。但他也希望经此一疫,新加坡能摒弃掉多年来我们当中的许多人都表现出的——自以为是,傲慢自大,和很强的自我优越感。 首个错误决策,是因为初步评估判断冠状病毒19严重程度更接近猪流感(或H1N1),而不是SARS,这使得政府决定不关闭学校、停工停业。 其二,倡导人民不戴口罩。其三是尽管客工亦重组织已警告,客工宿舍拥挤环境恐成为防疫弱点,但当局未采取强制性、果断措施来管理。 刘浩典相信新加坡仍将挺过这场危机,感染人数成千上万,但死亡率应很低,再者政府已积极进行检测。 “我更担心的是,新加坡人会从这场危机中吸取错误的教训。” 他指出,尽管人民行动党不反对多样化观点和持不同政见者,不过坚持危机中人们应团结支持当局,异议争辩且暂时搁置。 但这种观点只对了一部分。危机中决策者面临的最大认知威胁不是缺乏团结,而是困在危机太久而产生狭隘视野。 “此外,面对一个前所未有、完全不熟悉的威胁时,我们现存的经验和机制可能都不足以应对,这使得政府倡导多元化变得更为重要,或者至少要对各种异议保持开放的心态。” 正如武汉的李文亮医生在去世前曾说:“一个健康的社会不该只有一个声音。”事实证明,那些一直呼吁政府为外籍劳工改善恶劣生活环境的人是正确的。他们就如李文亮医生一样,扮演着吹哨人的角色,尽管他们的观点不见得获得广泛认可。 以下为转载自香港科技大学微信号的中文版译文: 过去三个月内由于疫情原因,我一直在香港,这给我一个非常难得的机会从外部观察新加坡,观察一贯表现出色的新加坡政府如何在抑制新冠病毒传播的战役中挣扎,尤其是对众多低收入劳工居住(现已封闭隔离)的宿舍疫情防控的失败。新加坡人民行动党(PAP)政府应该为日益严峻的疫情承担什么责任? 到目前为止,很明显,新加坡政府做了三个重要的、且事后看来是错误的决策(包括不作为的决策)。…