~ By Bertha Henson ~

Because I have been in the business of asking questions for so long, I was interested to read about students' reactions to having their questions lobbed back at them by ministers in ST today in the Home section. Seems they are uncomfortable with this. I've had my own questions thrown back at me by newsmakers many times too in the past. But I could always resort to the phrase: I am a journalist, I shouldn't be giving my opinion. (In other words, hey, just answer lah).

I suppose students can't reply in that way – nor should they do a Rueben. But really there are so many ways to ask a question that will get you a proper answer. Also, it's the context that counts. Is this a Q&A session or a dialogue? Should there be engagement of minds? Or just one mind emptying itself out…?
 
Let's take the question on whether $100 entry levy is enough to deter Singaporeans from gambling at casinos that was cited in the article. With the question posed this way, it's safe to assume that the questioner DOESN"T think it's enough. Frankly, I would like to know why too before proceeding to answer to thekquestion..Obviously, the question has made a judgment call. In any case, what sort of answer could anyone expect? The minister will say not enough? We calculated wrongly? Wow…that would be a news story.
 
Or maybe the questioner DOESN'T have an opinion on the matter (didn't research it or whatever) and just wants to hear what the minister has to say. If so, ask it this way: How did the Government arrive at $100 as the entry levy to deter Singaporeans from going to casinos? Or: Why does the Government think that $100 levy is enough to deter Singaporeans from gambling?That way, you get a more informative answer and if you are fast on your feet, y/u can ask a follow-up question: Based on what you said about XXX, don't you think $100 is too low?
 
BTW, I note that these students are invited to a dialogue, not a monologue. That means, in my book, having an opinion based on facts and calling on the other party to respond.  So some thinking and researching should have been done in advance. But if that can't be done for some reason, then just ask for information and insight. Hopefully, you'll get an epiphany. 
 
TOC thanks Bertha Henson for her contribution, this article first appeared on her blog. Bertha Henson is a former Associate Editor of 'The Straits Times'.
 
You May Also Like

What makes a successful politician?

by: Ghui/ George Yeo and Lim Hwee Hua were both politicians who…

珍珠大厦持械伤人案 警方再逮捕九人

本月10日凌晨,在牛车水珍珠大厦发生持械伤人事件,相信因情感纠纷引起。 长达一分钟的闭路电视视频显示,数名站在走廊的青年,突然被一组人追击,可见其中有人手上还持有巴冷刀。 警方是在5月10日凌晨3时30分,接获上述持械纠众闹事的投报。当局随即在全岛展开搜捕。目前再逮捕九名嫌犯,使得落网嫌犯增至12人。 此次落网的九男一女,年龄介于18至28岁,警方在非法组织成员、涉嫌非法集会和持危险武器纠众闹事罪名下,逮捕他们。其中一名男子因涉嫌窝藏两名被捕男子,也被警方调查。 警方目前寻找两名男子Muhammad Syukri Bin Muhammad Iskandar和Muhammad Ilham Bin Noordin的下落。警方呼吁民众如有线索,可拨打刑事侦查局热线6435…

SDP proposes to revamp education system to cultivate creative and critical thinking individuals

Education is the bedrock of every successful civilisation and Singapore is no…

国际特赦组织剥夺昂山素枝“良心大使奖”

国际特赦组织今天宣布,收回颁发给缅甸实质领导人、国务资政昂山素枝的“良心大师奖”(Ambassador of Conscience Award)。 缅甸军队对罗兴亚穆斯林犯下暴行,但昂山素枝却没有为遭受暴力的难民发声。 国际特赦组织秘书长奈度对此感到十分失望,称昂山素枝不再是“希望、勇气与永远捍卫人权的象征。” 该组织是在2009年颁发良心大使奖予昂山素枝,当时他还在软禁中。 “国际特赦组织无法为您仍具受颁良心大使奖的资格辩护,因此我们很难过地要就此收回这个奖。” Aung San Suu Kyi…