Below is the speech delivered by Kumaran Pillai, TOC Chief Editor at the Minimum Wage Forum organised by Transitioning.

Good afternoon ladies and gentlemen, distinguished panel of speakers and the organizers of this forum.  

As a first speaker at this forum, I have the privilege of setting the tone or at least have the honour of putting all the arguments forward for the other speakers to either refute or develop my arguments further.

As a way of introduction, perhaps it is worthy to mention that MM Lee had said that the opposition has a closed loop system and in fact the opposition would come up with the same solutions (economic, social and presumably political) if they had an open platform.

I differ on that point. I think we are capable of having an even more open and robust platform should we be more open.

So today, I have decided to take a different tack. I’ll put the arguments as to why we should also consider the alternatives for minimum wage, I’ll make a case that minimum wage is only a temporary measure and has very limited implementation. 

So, in that vein, let’s proceed to have an open discussion about it.

There will be 3 things that I shall cover in my speech today:

One, on historical perspective of wealth – I am not just limiting my arguments about minimum wages, but I am going to focus on overall wealth distribution strategies for a mature economy like Singapore. My primary assumption is that work is just a function of wealth building; it is a means to an end and not the end by itself.  It means that we go to work each day to enrich ourselves and it should not be viewed merely as means of sustenance.

So anybody who is interested in helping those who are downtrodden must look at a holistic solution and not just a patchwork of policies. Some hold the view however, that minimum wage is the solution and the way to building an egalitarian society.

In that regard, I concern myself with the equality of rights, social mobility and upward movement, because that would be the basis on which wealth building can take place. No one, I mean no one, should be disadvantaged based on age, gender, race or even educational qualification. To participate in the economy is a fundamental right.  The case for minimum wage comes when one’s wage is so low that he has lost his ability to participate because of his current economic status.

Two, a situational analysis of the current challenges faced by the local workforce, business (especially the small and medium sized businesses) and our current economic structure and why it is not working anymore. 

And finally, to build a case for minimum wage and more so to consider the alternatives to minimum wage and why the stakeholders should take a hard look at the alternatives. 

Historical Perspective of Wealth

It may sound a bit cliché, but modern societies have resolved much of the problems associated with wealth building and wealth distribution. From a historical perspective, all of us are living better lives that those living in abject poverty and those living under the brutality of hunting and gathering. 

Two things have led to this:

  1. Rational thinking and institutionalized learning
  2. The concept of ownership – first it was land, later labour (which led to slavery and now it has been abolished) and now capital

In fact, in the past, the concept of ownership was so potent that it led to structures of ownership, power and influence.

In a feudalistic society, for example, ownership of land resides with the feudal lord. Everything is owned by the king or the emperor and people in return worked and tilled the ground in exchange for goods and services. With a monopoly of all the productive resources, he soon became the source of power, authority and influence.

We have evolved since and because of rapid industrialisation in much of Europe and America, philosophers began to think about the ownership structures of productive resources in a nation and who should be the real owners of these assets. Since then, we have seen a shift of power because ownership was transferred from the state to the people. Today, we are able to achieve that through the capital markets. It is the democratisation of our productive resources.

If you come from that perspective, then we should have a limited government. We should not have a government that interferes into the workings of the economy and real ownership of these assets is the real key to wealth building. Then, having a conversation about minimum wage would be akin to giving a patient a placebo. It is just a symptomatic relieve and does not address the underlying issues at hand.  

Singapore is a mixed economy, much of our economic assets are state owned and as a result, the government is in a rent seeking mode. Whenever, I use the term rent seeking, it reminds me of the feudal structures of the past, where rulers were lording over the subjects.

The government is the problem not the solution

When American President Ronald Regan took office in the 80s, the first thing he said was that

“The government is not the solution to the problem, the government is the problem.”

We have a similar situation in Singapore today.  If I were to purely advocate minimum wage, without addressing the fundamental issues of rent seeking, without addressing how the government is lording over us, without having a discussion about the inefficiencies of the GLC structures of GIC and Temasek and without my spiel about widespread malaise that is taking place like in the case of SCDF and CNB. Then, I will be doing this forum disfavour.

We need to be cognizant of the fact that historical performance does not guarantee future performance or results. What worked in the past, worked well in the past! When we first started, the government opted for a model where the state controlled the resources; they set the savings rate, and they determined the GDP growth rate. It worked well for us, for a period of time though, and I must add that there were several other factors that contributed to our success, such as the geographical location of Singapore and the FDI driven model. But, things are different now, there is no assurance that what worked in the past will continue to work in the future. That those in power, i.e. our very own “feudal lord” will continue to give us the magic pill or that we can rely on the asset enhancement programme of the government to ensure that we have a fair share of the economic progress.

New challenges of Today

In a globalized economy, resources are fairly mobile and it includes both capital and human resources. It works on the basis that capital seeks assets that yield the best returns. In other words, if I were a money manager, I would invest in an instrument that would give me the best ROI. If I were a HR manager, I would seek the best man for the job.

The government has no business in this front. Its core function is to be a regulator and not a provider of services. It should focus on coming up with the right policy framework and not meddle with the way the economy is run. The government should not be in the business of making money.

All of us have gathered around this room today to speak about the social injustices that are taking place. Some people believe that the current social malaise exists because of capital markets and the underlying greed that drives it. As a Chief Editor of The Online Citizen, I receive many letters and some of them hold the view that there exists social inequality because of greed, because the rich exploit the poor and the portrayal that the rich are mean heartless bastards who have no remorse or conscience. It tells me that there are perception issues – in this case, about capitalism.

As a spokesperson for the free enterprise economy and as a spokesperson who advocates a limited government, I say that such aspersions are baseless and unfair.

Even if I bought the argument that capitalism is greedy, through reasoning, the biggest greedy pig in Singapore is the government for it owns 60% of our productive resources.

The current Situation

So what are the problems that we face in our society today?

  1. An economy that is under-performing because of rent seeking practices of the government. Allocation of resources is not efficient and some economists have also argued that investing our national reserves abroad develops foreign economies at the expense of our own.
  2. An insular trading culture among GLCs – contracts are based on affinity and common shareholding. Though there is an open tender system, it is not what meets the eyes. The sales process usually starts way before the tender exercise and potential awardees are shortlisted even before the tender is called.  
  3. Anti-competition commission needs to step up and rein in the GLCs –  the acquisition of SCS by NCS should have been disallowed. In fact they should put more pressure on GLCs and should look into the anti-competitive practices that I just pointed out.
  4. CPF is underperforming – performing below market returns. Temasek holdings making 17% while our CFP is returning 2+% returns per annum. So our monies are put to good work elsewhere while we get the short end of the stick.
  5. A high inflation rate at 5% erodes our overall wealth – it affects everybody and not just the low wage worker. Setting a minimum wage is useless under such conditions; unless there is a provision that minimum wage is adjusted every year for inflation.
  6. High property prices making it almost impossible for first time owners to purchase a flat. Also commercial rents are so high that it constitutes the major part of business costs.
  7. Technology acquisition costs are so high that some businesses substitute technology with low wage workers. Worse, companies exploit labour to keep costs to a minimum.
  8. High cost of financing – government has an unfair advantage while small and medium sized business find it difficult to raise finance. The government finances its business activities through taxation, while the individual can’t.
  9. Hyper competition – where business owners compete based on price alone and there are no other differentiating factors.

Possible solutions

I am going to enumerate possible solutions to our current challenges. These can be either considered independently or in tandem with the current proposal for minimum wage.

  1. Wage supplement/subsidies for low wage workers to assist companies to cope with the rise in wages and costs.
  2. Innovation grant for local companies so that local businesses can invest in technology and training for their staff.
  3. Restrict the flow of foreigners – WDA to draw up a competency framework and work out the skill gap in our economy.  I was told that they do have a current framework in place. In which case, much needs to be done to ensure that the framework is implemented and enforced by the Ministry of Manpower. We should rationalize the current flow of both foreign workers and talent that is coming through our doors and it should only be the case where we bring in talent to meet short term demands. At the same time, the government should focus on developing long term capability of our workforce.
  4. Planned divestment of Temasek’s assets so that a more equitable wealth distribution can take place.
  5. Abolish supplementary income on the national budget but the side effect of this is that it, we may need to increase corporate taxes. On the upside, we have more people participating in the economy and a more equitable wealth distribution can take place. 
  6. Introduce capital gains tax for stocks – this would eliminate excessive churning in the stock market and it would curtail all the unscrupulous speculation that is taking place in our capital markets today.
  7. Encourage stock options and other schemes to include workers in the wealth creation process.

Having a workforce that is experienced, well trained and loyal is an asset. In the long run, business owners and government should focus on employee retention policies rather than policies that promote hyper competition.


The exploitation that is taking place in the market today is not because of greed as what some people put it. It is because the Singapore government is an active participant in the local economy, stifling innovation and drawing monies out of the circular flow of income. It is the rent seeking practices of our government that needs to be abolished.

I like to add that minimum wage is just an artificial wage floor. What I fear most, is that, unscrupulous employers will start circumventing the proposed minimum wage system by paying lower than the recommended wages. That is bound to happen as long as there are people who are desperate enough to take up those jobs.

We are only going to end up spending heaps of monies monitoring these illegal activities. That money can be spent on wage subsidies and other programmes that directly impacts and alleviates the issues faced by low wage earners.

In my opinion, the natural and the best way to do this, is to restrict the flow, in this case the flow of foreign workers to ensure wages reach a new equilibrium.

To institute a government sanctioned minimum wage policy, whether today or sometime in the future is in the same vein. It is replacing one form of inefficiency with another.  I hope some wisdom will prevail.

Thank you.

You May Also Like

520万口罩 后天起派予130万家户

后天(2月1日)起,政府将派发多达520万个口罩,予国内130万户家庭。 平均每一户新加坡籍家庭,可获分配四个手术口罩。这是一次性的派发口罩活动,领取者需携带身份证核实身份。 政府今日宣布,下月1日起至9日,民众可前往民众俱乐部和居委会中心领取口罩。 当局重申,只有感到不适才需戴口罩,因此每户人家获分配四个口罩,仍足够。 迄今为止在本地确诊的新型冠状病毒病例已增至10宗,不过目前未有在本地社区扩散的迹象。 1日的领取口罩时间,是下午2时到晚上10时;2日到9日,则是早上10时至晚10时。口罩必须在9日完全送出。 尽管当局称口罩供应充足,但在全球供应短缺的情况下,当局仍寻找新的口罩供应商,并从传统供应商那里增加新供应。 政府也指过去九天,已经向零售商发放了500万口罩。 当局称将优先让老弱人口较多的地区、建国一代居民和租赁租屋居民,领取口罩。 当局安排,组屋区居民可优先本周六到下周三,到住家附近指定的居委会中心领取口罩。私人住宅区居民,以及之前没有到居委会领取口罩的居民,则可在下个月6日到9日之间领取。 当局称居民可留意居委会的布告板、装置在组屋的电子显示屏以及社交媒体平台,查询领取口罩的地点和时间。 另一方面,武装部队漏夜张罗包装口罩的工作,并把它们运送到全国89个民众俱乐部。人民协会将负责让国人领取口罩。…


全球每年对建筑材料的需求量达到300至400亿吨,其中砂石就占了半数,是仅次于水源,人类开采、使用最多的天然资源。 近五年,中国和印度大兴土木,中国国内建设发展迅速,仅一年就铺设了12万6千公里的大道。对于砂石的需求量大,仅2011至2014年,其混凝土建材用料总和相当于美国在整个20世纪的用量。 当这些国家内的砂石供不应求,促成了国际砂石的贸易。许多国家包括新加坡,都有向泰国,缅甸,柬埔寨,印尼和马来西亚等国,进口砂石,然而其中有也有来自非法采砂的供应。 在斯里兰卡,挖沙造成环境破坏,挖沙也拉低水平面,污染饮水源;挖砂留下一坑坑死水,引起霍乱肆虐。 2014年,沙石占了全球采集矿产的85巴仙。暴增需求量推高砂石价格,鼓励非法挖砂活动。每年采砂总值500亿英镑,在砂石稀缺的地方,每平方米砂石售价可高达62英镑。 有人或许会问,既然中东和沙哈拉沙漠拥有大片砂石,为何非得用河砂或海砂?原因在于沙漠的砂经过长期风化摩擦变得非常圆润无棱,相对下海砂河砂则更容易与混凝土完美融合。即便是杜拜的摩天高楼,建材也不来自周边沙漠,用的砂石却是进口自远方的澳洲。 黑心采砂不在乎环境问题 如果从偏远内陆河床或小岛沙滩,就能采集到源源不绝的砂石,为何要花钱向合法砂矿买砂? 砂石有价致使这些黑心商家铤而走险,挖取砂石谋取无本暴利,根本不在乎对环境造成的破坏,甚至挖掉整座岛、一系列的岛屿,也在所不惜。 在印度,有环境记者因为尝试揭发非法挖砂而丧命。基于可降低成本,一些进口国也鲜少过问砂石的来源是否合法。 中国对于南中国海的主权扩张,砂石的作用也少不了:用以建设可驻军的人造岛屿。 新加坡,世界最大的砂石进口国,进口来自印尼、大马、柬埔寨和泰国等地,大部分为非法采集的砂石,用以填海拓展国土面积达20巴仙。…

Single-mother suffering from depression, asks CPF board not to mislead public and questions its intention to name her

The 45-year-old single-mother who was featured in a TOC report on Wednesday,…

被判囚26个月加三鞭 狼师趁课外活动非礼男生

37岁教师借着负责课外活动之便,对七名男孩伸出安禄山之爪,被判两年零两个月的徒刑及三鞭刑。 为了保护年幼的受害者,被告、学校及相关课外活动等讯息都被谕令不可刊登。 面对三项侮辱暴行的控状,被告表示认罪,他还有另外六项控状还交由法官考量中。 据法庭文件显示,被告负责教导数门科目,且负责一个制服团体的课外活动。他被控于2015年、2016年和2017年期间,非礼了七名14岁,都是他所负责的制服团体参与者的男孩。 他是在一次提出要在放学后,开车送一名男孩回家时,首次犯案。 多次出言恐吓受害者 当时,男孩坐在前排的乘客座位上,被告就询问男孩是否有看过色情影片,令男孩吓了一跳,而被告在男孩回答之前,还用手做出手淫的淫秽动作。 抵达男孩住家外时,被告突然非礼男孩,还表示“只是玩玩,不要告诉其他的老师”。男孩当时很害怕且不知该如何反应,随后就下车离开了。 一年后,被告再次对另一名男孩下手。这名男孩当时因为缺席课外活动,被处罚跪在地上打扫健身房,被告就乘机,突然自后方抱紧男孩。 男孩感到非常不舒服,尝试挣脱时,被告却将手伸到其衣服内非礼他,令男孩当场受到惊吓,感到沮丧且不知该怎么办。被告则对男孩说,“这里发生的一切,只能保留在这里”。 男孩最后退出了该制服团体。 被告在2017年时,假学校体育馆内,对一名正在使用健身滚轴的男孩下手。被告当时询问受害者能够在滚轴的帮助下,降到多低,并表示会帮助受害者,跟着就将手放在受害者的身体下方。…