~ By Bertha Henson ~

Because I have been in the business of asking questions for so long, I was interested to read about students' reactions to having their questions lobbed back at them by ministers in ST today in the Home section. Seems they are uncomfortable with this. I've had my own questions thrown back at me by newsmakers many times too in the past. But I could always resort to the phrase: I am a journalist, I shouldn't be giving my opinion. (In other words, hey, just answer lah).

I suppose students can't reply in that way – nor should they do a Rueben. But really there are so many ways to ask a question that will get you a proper answer. Also, it's the context that counts. Is this a Q&A session or a dialogue? Should there be engagement of minds? Or just one mind emptying itself out…?
 
Let's take the question on whether $100 entry levy is enough to deter Singaporeans from gambling at casinos that was cited in the article. With the question posed this way, it's safe to assume that the questioner DOESN"T think it's enough. Frankly, I would like to know why too before proceeding to answer to thekquestion..Obviously, the question has made a judgment call. In any case, what sort of answer could anyone expect? The minister will say not enough? We calculated wrongly? Wow…that would be a news story.
 
Or maybe the questioner DOESN'T have an opinion on the matter (didn't research it or whatever) and just wants to hear what the minister has to say. If so, ask it this way: How did the Government arrive at $100 as the entry levy to deter Singaporeans from going to casinos? Or: Why does the Government think that $100 levy is enough to deter Singaporeans from gambling?That way, you get a more informative answer and if you are fast on your feet, y/u can ask a follow-up question: Based on what you said about XXX, don't you think $100 is too low?
 
BTW, I note that these students are invited to a dialogue, not a monologue. That means, in my book, having an opinion based on facts and calling on the other party to respond.  So some thinking and researching should have been done in advance. But if that can't be done for some reason, then just ask for information and insight. Hopefully, you'll get an epiphany. 
 
TOC thanks Bertha Henson for her contribution, this article first appeared on her blog. Bertha Henson is a former Associate Editor of 'The Straits Times'.
 
You May Also Like

阻断措施期间还到保护区露营钓鱼! 三男子面控认罪

在阻断措施实施期间划皮艇、到乌敏岛钓鱼、露营,三名男子今日(5月18日)被控上庭,纷纷认罪。 莫哈莫哈菲兹(36岁)、以及38岁的里扎尼和祖尔曼所面对的控状包括触犯冠状病毒19法令、违反保护区法令、公园与木林条例以及在保护区钓鱼。 他们被控于4月13日傍晚,自万国和淡滨尼的住家出发,随后在白沙公园停车场相聚,违反了冠毒19法令。 划皮艇倒保护区 他们之后在约晚上7时,划皮艇进入乌敏岛自然保护区仄爪哇湿地(Chek Jawa),这个自2007年10月开始就禁止任何人和船只进入的地区。三人在当地过夜,一直到隔天早上10时才离开,期间他们挂吊床、搭帐篷和升营火,都触犯了《公园与树木法》。 在自然保护区内,祖尔曼和里扎尼还用钓鱼竿钓鱼,再次触犯保护区法令。

SDP – MOH must tackle root cause of healthcare problems

The members of the Healthcare Advisory Panel from Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) has…

Popular Book Company apologises for tweet on Amos Yee

Local bookstore, Popular, has apologised for a tweet it posted on Thursday…

含有强效成分 卫生局促三产品下架

基于含有强效成分,卫生科学局劝请民众勿食用或购买据称可壮阳的两款咖啡以及一种糖果,即Kopi Jantan Ali Macca、Kopi Panggung ALAmbiak 以及Berry Jaga糖果。 卫生局今日发文告指出,接获民众投报指在勿洛北3街一个咖啡店内,有售卖这两种咖啡,而Kopi Panggung ALAmbiak 以及Berry…