~ By Tan Kin Lian ~

Is this a local election to elect a Member of Parliament to represent a constituency or a mini referendum on the performance of the PAP Government?

In my view, it is both; and more inclined towards the latter.

Local election
Both candidates have good points and deserve the support of the voters.

Desmond Choo of the Peoples’ Action Party has been working hard and “wearing his socks out”. He has also promised to continue to work in the constituency, even if he is not elected in this round.  He does get good media coverage – which is a benefit of contesting under the PAP banner.

Png Eng Huat of the Workers Party has been working in the grassroots in Hougang for five years. I know of this fact, as he was my former colleague. I know Png to be reliable, helpful and friendly.  He may appear to be “low key” but I watched a video of his speech at the previous general election – and he talked sense!

Whoever wins on 26 May will be a win for Hougang voters.

Mini Referendum
I expect that this by-election will be a mini referendum on the performance of the PAP Government over the year since the 2011 general election.

Positive Points
Here are the positive points that voters can give credit to the Government
1. It carried out a salary review of government ministers and implemented a cut of one third of their previous salaries. Link.
2. It accelerated the building of HDB flats. When completed in a few years time, the new supply is likely to moderate or reduce the cost of HDB flats. Link.
3. It reduced the issue of work passes for foreign workers and declined to renew some existing passes. Link.
4. It invested $1.1 billion to provide more buses for public transport. Link
5. It launched the Financial Advisory Industry Review to look into consumer issues in the finance sector. Link
6. It promised to review the insurance schemes for medical and long term care. Link

These are commendable efforts, although many critics were able to find fault with the pace, extent and direction of these initiatives.

Negative Points
I give demerit points to the Government on the following issues.
1. It refused to amend the Internal Security Act, in spite of a similar act being abolished in Malaysia. Link
2. It delayed the calling of the Hougang by-election unnecessarily, which prompted a resident to take this matter to court. Link
3. It appeared to be rather weak, depending on a few experienced ministers to look after several key ministries and to rely on new ministers that are inexperienced in their portfolios.
4. It refused to recognise the flaws in past policies that caused the bad outcomes, and to make fundamental changes, preferring instead to “tweak” the ineffective policies.

My vote
If I were a voter in Hougang (and I am not), I would place my vote for the Workers Party. It is important to pass a message to the PAP Government that several existing policies need a fundamental review and change. They should also change their style of government and be prepared to listen more to the “common sense” of the people in deciding on the future direction of Singapore.

This article is published by The Online Citizen, 20 Maxwell Road, #09-17 Maxwell House, Singapore 069113.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

TWC2 goes public with story about migrant workers being locked inside room after MWC failed to show any signs of action

In a Facebook post published on Tuesday (21 April), migrant labour’s rights…

狮城学者困惑何以港警围堵商场 忧警民关系近崩溃未来冲突规模更大

新加坡国立大学政治学助理教授庄嘉颖,日前接受《星洲日报》采访,担心经过接二连三事件后,香港警民关系几近崩溃,未来冲突和暴力事件可能比以往更容易发生、规模更大。 尽管香港特首林郑月娥在7月9日宣布,《逃犯条例》修法“寿终正寝”,惟无助缓和香港紧张局势。示威港民坚持五大诉求:撤回修例、追究警察过度执法、不检控和释放反送中示威者、撤销暴动定性,以及要求特首林郑月娥问责下台。 上周末,香港再次爆发多出游行抗议。包括上水反水货客游行、沙田区反送中游行,均演变成大规模警民冲突。例如在周日(14日)晚港警攻入沙田新城市广场,期间示威者向警方丢掷雨伞杂物,而警方出动胡椒喷雾及警棍还击,事件造成20人受伤入院。 庄嘉颖对于何以港警将示威者围堵在沙田商场,感到疑惑,因为这可能让群众的情绪更为激烈。 他相信这会造成在未来的示威集会,即使警方进行一些合理执法,但示威者可能依据以往经验,认为警方可能会有更激烈行动,而选择先发制人;至于警方也可能判定示威者行为会更激烈,而采取更强硬的手法。 他认为,如果双方都抱持这样的心态,预计未来冲突、暴力事件更容易发生,规模也更大。 庄教授指出,过去港警和民众有一种默契,即只要不作出过度的行为,抗议完毕后就可三区,但这种默契基本上已破坏了。 近日也有传媒报导,港特首林郑月娥已多次请辞,但遭北京方面拒绝。不过庄嘉颖分析,目前港人对香港政府和整个政治体制已不信任,林郑辞职对于安抚民心只能起到短暂的效果,无济于事。 林郑下台无济于事 他反问,即使林郑下台,当前局势那么僵,谁又愿意接这烫手山芋?“至少我现在看不到有谁有能力破局。” 再者,若北京中央政府把林郑换下来,也形同承认北京当初在政策上误判,因为林郑也是中央任命的。但如果换上更强硬的人物,香港局势势必更僵。 他建议,暴力个案应个别处理,香港有完善的法律,发难者可经过法律程序审理。至于究竟集会、示威者是否等同“暴力”、“暴动”,应交由法院裁定,而不是行政部门。…

Introduction of the code of conduct for pedestrians is good though overdue, says WP MP Dennis Tan

Singapore’s first-ever code of conduct for pedestrians was recently introduced, which is…

SM Goh, please love your country more than the PAP

National Day and grassroots orgs should not be politicised, says Choo Zheng Xi