Wondering what's the fuss about the 8-lane highway that the Government is planning to build through the historic Bukit Brown Cemetery? Well here are 5 of the most frequently asked questions and their answers.

1. Isn’t it a good thing to destroy a part of Bukit Brown for faster roads & a residential estate? After all, the dead don’t mind and the living will benefit. How much new housing area can be created with the destruction of Bukit Brown?

Err, we’re not sure the dead don’t mind! But even if they don’t, the enormous historical, cultural, environmental value of Bukit Brown far outweighs the benefits of a four-way road that seeks to "bring relief to the increasingly congested Lornie Road" (ST, 20 Nov 2011). We believe that other creative solutions can be found to relieve traffic congestion. Furthermore, there are only 111 cars per 1,000 people* in Singapore. Why should Bukit Brown and so many other precious historical sites make way to serve this small proportion of the population? Destruction is forever.

As for the benefit of new housing, the government’s plan is to build a “future estate that spans more than 200ha – bigger than Serangoon and slated to have a mix of private and public housing. Although this will be developed only in 30 to 40 years, the new road is necessary today to bring relief to the increasingly congested Lornie Road.” While this will benefit people, we feel that the government can choose to provide more housing area by first developing many other spaces that have much less historical & cultural value compared to Bukit Brown (e.g. golf courses).

In fact, the Final Report of the Focus Group on Land Allocation submitted to the Ministry of National Development in December 2000 already calls for the preservation of green spaces and building buildings taller to make land use more efficient. The Land Transport Authority’s 2008 Land Transport Master Plan likewise advocates both making public transport, especially rail, the mode of choice for commuters and controlling vehicle population growth. Deputy Prime Minister and Finance Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam reiterated these points in his recent 2012 Budget Speech. Preserving Bukit Brown is consistent with these goals.

*For the official figures from the Department of Statistics, Singapore, see:
http://www.singstat.gov.sg/stats/keyind.html#socind (under “Social Indicators”)
http://www.singstat.gov.sg/pubn/reference/sif2011.pdf (page 18)

 

2. The government has indicated that they will only destroy 5,000 graves. That’s only 5% of Bukit Brown. And they aren’t even the graves of “famous people”. So isn’t that ok?

Famous or ordinary, we want to symbolically honour them all as pioneers of Singapore. And we feel that this proposed destruction of 5% of Bukit Brown in 2012 is merely testing the waters of public opinion. If we do not speak up against it now, one day there will be the eventual & complete destruction of Bukit Brown, and with it, the great value of this shared historical space.

3. There is already some documentation work going on for the graves that will be destroyed. Isn’t that adequate for preserving our memories?

We thank Dr Hui Yew-Foong & his team for doing this back-breaking work of documentation. This should go on even if Bukit Brown is preserved, as the gravestones will eventually become illegible due to wear & tear. However, we believe there is a huge intangible difference between reading about Bukit Brown’s documentation in a book or museum, and having the actual sensory experience of walking in a physical space among the trees and quiet gravestones, reflecting on our shared history and culture. We want this for our children too.

4. Hardly anyone remembered Bukit Brown before the proposed destruction. Now suddenly there’s all this hype. Surely this will all die down (no pun intended)?

In our rush to study, work, earn & just keep up with this frantic pace of life, we have neglected so much of our history and culture. This wake-up call has made many Singaporeans take a trip to Bukit Brown to enjoy the scenary and appreciate its great historical and cultural value. We want to preserve this not just for Singaporeans in 2011, but for generations to come.

5. How feasible is it to preserve Bukit Brown as a heritage park or cemetary park?

We believe it is highly feasible. From Paris to Penang, London to Los Angeles, Montreal to Malacca, and many many more, cemeteries are integral to the living space of many metropolitan areas, serving as parks, heritage sites, and public spaces. Some have more than one cemetery park. If other cities can, why can’t Singapore? Here are some links to cemetery parks in cities around the world:

  1. Yanaka Cemetery, Tokyo, Japan
  2. Aoyama Cemetery, Tokyo, Japan
  3. Bukit Cina, Melaka, Malaysia
  4. Protestant Cemetery, Penang, Malaysia
  5. Los Angeles, California, USA – CemeteryTour.com, Cemetery Tours: Who's Who of Hollywood
  6. San Francisco, California, USA
  7. Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
  8. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
  9. Atlanta, Georgia, USA
  10. Washington, DC, USA
  11. Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
  12. Berlin, Germany – Cemetery Berlin, List of Cemeteries in Berlin
  13. Moscow, Russia
  14. Vienna, Austria – Central Cemetery (Zentralfried), Touring Cemeteries of Vienna
  15. Beijing, China
  16. St. Petersburg, Russia
  17. The French Quarter, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA – New Orleans Cemeteries, Cemetries of New Orleans, Chalmette National Cemetery
  18. Hong Kong (Happy Valley) Cemetery, Hong Kong – Find a GraveHong Kong Cemetery

 

Save Singapore's Nature & Heritage. Join The Fight To Save Bukit Brown!

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Government to provide public transport vouchers for low-income households help cope with with 4.3% hike in fare or some say, 11%

Following the latest fare increase by the Public Transport Council (PTC), the…

“Over-excessive immigration policy” to blame: commenter to Lui

Posting on Minister of Transport Lui Tuck Yew’s Facebook page, commenter Keith…

Vietnamese netizens demand apology for PM Lee’s “untrue and disrespectful” remarks

In his post on Facebook (31 May) expressing his condolences for the…

搞到警大阵仗出动 女大学生涉虚报校园遇袭被调查

涉嫌谎称在校园内遭“袭击”,导致警方派出大批警员和辜加警察,还出动警犬队,一名女大学生被警方调查。 事件发生于周末(14日),警方指出于当天傍晚6时24分,接获19岁的南洋理工大学女学生报案,指在南洋径(Nanyang Walk)遭人袭击。 警方在接获报案后,派出大批警员和辜加警察,更出动警犬队到现场展开调查。 有学生当晚曾看见约10辆警车和救护车抵达南大,封锁了南洋径,驻守在该处。警方逐层搜索了宿舍以及附近的丛林,在南大教育学院、艺术、设计与媒体学院还有第16宿舍外都有警察车的踪迹。 大约三十名警员出动搜查,还有警犬队负责追踪“袭击者”的行踪,更对往来车辆进行严密检查。而住在第16宿舍的学生们也接到注意安全、留在室内的通知。 但是在经过了至少两个小时的搜查后,警方证实,并没有所谓的“袭击案”,于是逮捕了报假案的女大学生。 有网民表示曾看见警员在搜查后,带走一名在现场哭泣的女子,据称就是涉嫌报假案的女大学生。 警方指出,事件还在调查中,为了避免带来不必要的恐慌,劝请民众不要随意揣测或评论有关事件。 南大校方在接获校园传出“袭击”事件后,配合警方调查,于周日凌晨1时许发出通知,要求在校学生留在室内。 当局指出,警方于周末到校园内封锁部分地区,因为接获报案指有女大学生在校园内遭到袭击,而随后证实有关事件纯属假造。 “警方在完成调查后证实,19岁的女学生报假案,她并没有受到袭击。”…