~by: Kin M Ah~


Ok I’ll be upfront, this is the airing of a personal grievance – no wait, repulsion.

There’s this little club (accessible mostly to a privileged few) located in a hotel on Robertson Quay that’s been doing great business. It operates exclusively on an ‘invitation only’ basis The club boasts that its clientele includes the children of the wealthy in Singapore (read: charge it to Daddy’s credit card, please).

Now here’s what most customers of this joint ALREADY know but don’t want to articulate publicly for fear of reprisal (read: not being able to patronize the joint in future). In more than a handful of anecdotal accounts (including one from an established journalist for a daily newspaper who griped about this in a FB status update) the reservation process works in the following way:

Customer: Hi I want to make a reservation/table booking for 8
Joint Staff: Sure, for 8, the minimum spend is XX. (Normal business practice for all clubs, no surprise)
Customer: Great, that’s fine.
Joint Staff: Oh, how many white people do you have in your group?

Are you kidding me? I don’t mind if you have a minimum spend policy, or a male/female ratio one; but a Singapore business discriminating against Singaporeans?

So I ask you, does this matter to you as Singaporeans? If you think you could spend enough money but still can’t get your friends in because you don’t have enough white people in your group, then that’s a real BIG problem.

In the USA, the very question is enough to qualify as a “hate crime” and is chargeable offence. I ask you this question, “does this sound right to you?” As for me, I will never patronise this joint or its new affiliate joint in Marina Square in future.

But if you decide that you want to go, I just have one question for you, “how many white people are there in your group?”

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

有交租临时被令收摊 牛车水阿伯视频引网民热议

一名摆摊老人今早如常乘公假到牛车水摆摊,不料执法单位临时告知今天不能摆摊,也没有事先通知,令老人无所适从。 网民Lee Ah Chwee为摆摊小贩打抱不平,将这段采访直播放上网,旋即引起网民议论。从早上至晚上7时许,就有900余次分享和97则评论,大部分网民都感到愤慨,不解牛车水近期没有工程、没有大型节目,执法单位不让小贩做点小生意,未免太不近人情。 视频中的老人称,如果有工程发展、政府要用到场地,提早通知他们,他们就不来摆摊。十余年来公共假期摆摊都没有问题,但是今天都已经摆好货品了,却突然来要小贩们收摊。 “只要讲得合理,我们会接受,但是先前都没有来通知我们。如果我们不对,可以叫警察来抓我们。“ 视频中也可见一批灰衣执法人员,前往通知另一摊位。有网民认为应该是环境局的执法人员。 有网民询问老人是否非法摆摊,Lee Ah Chwee也回应,老人是有缴费的,每个月大概一百新元左右,也在当地摆卖了十多年。 Richard Lim认为,现在既然牛车水又不是要办什么节目,让老人赚点钱又何妨,“况且他们又有交租,摆在那儿又不碍观瞻,为什么需要那么的不近人情。不能摆摊就提早通知,等到他们把摊子摆好之后才来赶人,那么不是要叫小贩们没了收入,交通费又倒贴,情何以堪!“…

Marina Bay Sands suffers losses amounting to US$113 million in Q2 due to circuit breaker closure

In the second quarter of this year, Marina Bay Sands (MBS) suffered…

独乐乐不如众乐乐 女子与耄耋共庆生

施比受更有福,一名女子办生日庆祝会,与会者不只有朋友,更邀请了众多年长者参与。 一名女子安琪拉(Angela)欢庆36岁生日,但也为耄耋们带来欢笑声,刚在周日(11月10日)下午5时,在循环路(Circuit Road)第42座组屋楼下举办的生日会,也在Instagram上分享生日会的欢乐照片和视频。 据了解,寿星安琪拉曾在该区居住,反映该区有不少独居年长者。她一年会组织约四次类似聚会,让有兴趣的年长者们参与他发起组织的活动,“让老人们能到这里相聚后互相交流”。 善良的安琪拉,还曾分配家庭必需品给年长者们,让这些长辈到该集合地领取后回家。“那是六、七年前的事情了,过后我就一直这样做了。” 她感慨这些年长者们独居,也担心万一发生了什么事情,也没有人知道他们的处境。 安琪拉自费办聚餐,虽然只是简单的自由餐,“但看到他们能够开心、快乐地享受,我就感到非常满足了。”   View this post on…

一女子惊觉受骗报案曝光 留英才子拟出国潜逃

敢做不敢当,涉嫌偷拍最少11名女性的本地留英大学生,在上周获得法院批准继续出国深造后,被指想要出国潜逃。 面对19项侮辱女性尊严以及一项拥有猥亵视频控状的22岁被告,昨日(14日)被控方在庭上揭露,前者曾经私讯友人,有计划到外国时寻求庇护,因此要求法庭撤销批准被告出国留学的决定。 据悉,原本案件中的受害者一共有11名女性,但是在案件新闻曝光后,一名与被告相识了六年的女子向警方报案,表示自己也是被偷拍的受害者之一,更将被告有意潜逃的手机短信内容交给警察。 女子不知自己也成受害者 控方指出,该名女子原本并不知道自己是受害者,一直到她看到自己成为被告偷拍的猥亵视频“主角”后,才惊觉自己被骗了。 女子透露,在不知晓自己就是受害者时,曾于去年10月接获被告的手机短信,指被告向她仔细分析了利弊后,有意到国外寻求庇护。 受害者要求公布被告身份 除此之外,控方也要求法庭解除隐瞒身份禁令,因为案件中的10名受害者一致认为,被告不该受到禁令保护,应该公开身份。其余的两名受害者中,其中一人仅有16岁,需要征询家人意见后才决定,另一人则所有保留。 针对公布被告身份议案,被告代表律师持反对票,他认为案件受害人和被告熟识,一旦公布被告身份,受害者身份也可能曝光。 法官表示,基于接获新的证据,针对是否允许被告继续到英国深造,以及是否接触隐瞒身份禁令,都将会在明日(16日)开审宣判。