~by: Elliot Aruldoss~
~with contributions from: Jewel Philemon~


“We should recognize many paths of success”, said Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong in his National Day Rally Speech. Mr Raj, principal of Victory Life Christian School could not agree more with the Prime Minister.

In speaking exclusively to The Online Citizen, Mr Raj says, “education, I believe, is individualised, a child cannot be put into a box and forced to conform to a structure that he does not fit in.”  He goes on to say that “success is achievable by every student. But each child will have his own journey and the time taken for each child to reach that success varies from student to student. We have to respect the fact that each child is unique and individual, so, the curriculum has to fit the child not the other way round.”

Victory Life Christian School (VLCS), situated in the eastern part of Singapore, follows an educational curriculum developed by the School of Tomorrow; a curriculum which is a unique combination of academics and methodology, based on physiological development patterns of the student. ‘The School of Tomorrow’ took the conventional textbook and divided it into bite-sized, achievable work-texts called PACEs.

Each PACE is more or less equivalent to a unit in a textbook. Each level consists of 12 PACEs in each subject. Students are able to learn at their own ‘pace’ and this provides for flexibility of time with realistic goal-setting.

Besides the educational component, the curriculum places equal emphasis on the development of moral values and Biblical principles for character building purposes.  This is a dimension to education that is otherwise, sorely lacking in emphasis within mainstream education systems, believes Mr Raj.

When asked about his views on mainstream education systems, Mr Raj observed that mainstream education is performance-based, which might not be entirely conducive to a child’s growth.

He maintains that a performance-based system would lead to unnecessary and sometimes, extreme, levels of competition, among not only between the child and his peers, but also among the child’s parents.

“We are all living in close proximity.  Families will always tend to compare with other families.  Sometimes it is not only for the benefit of the child but for the pride of the parents for their children to perform.’ Such an environment at home would exacerbate stress-levels and there would be mounting pressure within the child, to perform, especially after all the money spent on tuition.”

This will only lead to the child’s passion for learning being destroyed, replaced by an attitude of ‘studying for the sake of passing exams’ and not for the sake of learning, which is the original purpose of study, the principal of VLCS believes.

Mr Raj notes that while mainstream education tries to tackle the problem of varying learning abilities, they do it at a group level, and streaming at a very young age is an example of this.

He states that while individualising education can be done, to a certain extent in a group, another can of worms is opened, when a group is labelled as an academically weaker group and, thus, an inferior group. This perception may not only hurt the child belonging to that academically weaker group, but may also detrimentally stifle growth in the long-term. In some cases, it may leave deeper, more-pressing issues resonating within the child’s psyche, for example, low self-esteem.

On the other hand he affirms that the curriculum VLCS uses, provides an individualised education for each child, allowing each child to both, learn and grow, at their own pace.  He states that it is “a curriculum which fits a child, rather than a child fitting into a curriculum.”

Moreover, it eliminates pressure and stress, enhancing and protecting the learning process. There is no pressure of a time-line and this freedom is also passed on to the child’s parents who do not feel pressurised. Mr Raj also asserts that the curriculum adopted by his school is not an inferior or a lower-level educational system.

“This education system has been in existence for the last 40 years throughout the world. There are students who have graduated from this system that have made it into Oxford and Cambridge and if you see the list of schools that our students have gained entry to, you would be surprised”, Mr Raj declares proudly.

He also stated that the curriculum  of the ‘School of Tomorrow’ is a portable one, which can be taken into the homes. As such, parents wishing to home-school their children, could also use this method of education.

“Ideally the kids should be sent here at elementary level but compulsory education is up to PSLE.  So the child should be sent here after PSLE (Primary School Leaving Examination).,” VLCS’ principal suggests. “The child will eventually graduate with an American High School Diploma, which is an equivalent to the Junior College A’ Levels Certificate.”


Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Gaming firm Razer to give out 5 million free surgical masks to Singapore residents via vending machines

Renowned gaming firm Razer is set to give out up to five…

CPF protest: questions on transparency and Medishield premium excess

By Terry Xu More than a thousand individual turned up at Hong…

“文明社会不惩处公民私人评论” 李绳武称已缴付罚款

因为2017年7月的一则脸书贴文,批评我国政府“好诉讼” (ligitious),法庭制度“温顺” (pliant),李显扬之子李绳武,遭总检察署起诉藐视法庭。 上月29日,高庭裁决李绳武藐视法庭罪名成立,判罚款1万5000元,或一周监禁。 对于这项诉讼,李绳武在个人脸书更新资讯,称他已决定缴付罚款,以换来耳根清净。“缴付罚款,可避免给新加坡政府有便宜的借口,来攻击我和我的家人。” 但他强调,这并不代表他认罪,也不会否认在私人帖文中公开给友人的文字,坚称他写的东西并没有触法。再者,一个文明社会,不该因为公民的私人评论谈及司法系统,就因此以言入罪。 他重申,尽管政府声称他的私人贴文“丑化司法机构”,但他认为,滥用国家资源打压个人言论,才是真正的丑事。 “在为期三年的诉讼,新加坡总检察署写了千页法律文件、撤销我辩护宣誓书(defence affidavit)中的一些部分、还要求我公开我在脸书上所有的朋友。” 李绳武早在今年1月,已选择不参与这项诉讼,“不抬举总检察署所作所为”。然而即使他没参与,还是花了半年时间才有诉讼结果,“拖沓得足以使政府处理疫情失当、还召开选举。”

“用第三世界方式对待” 许通美:一房12客工如挤沙丁鱼

昨日(5日),本地单日新增确诊暴增120例创下新高,客工宿舍感染群也引起新的隐忧。其中S11榜鹅宿舍感染群,昨日单日就新增22例,累计感染的工友多达63人。卓源东路Westlite宿舍则累计28人感染。 新加坡巡回大使许通美教授,在脸书斥责我国“以第三世界的方式”对待这些外籍客工。 “政府允许雇主以没有座位的平板罗厘载送他们。客工们住在过于拥挤的宿舍,12个人如挤沙丁鱼般住一间房。”加之卫生等问题,许通美指这些客工宿舍如同待爆发的计时炸弹。 许通美指曾见过这些客工就坐在地上吃午餐、或是精疲力竭的客工躺在地上休息,认为我国不应以可耻的方式对打他们。 至于其他新增客工宿舍感染群还包括双溪登加客工宿舍(累计四例)、回利阁感染群(八例)、高琳二号宿舍(四例)、双溪加株环道客工宿舍(三例)、淡滨尼客工宿舍(五例)以及郜林一号宿舍(二例)。 今日《海峡时报》一篇报导,指有来自S11榜鹅宿舍的客工,反映他们缺乏口罩,也住在卫生条件欠佳和过于拥挤的环境。S11榜鹅宿舍住着逾万员工。 据了解,人力部长杨莉明昨日发文表示,在员工宿舍将落实更严谨防疫措施,加强社交距离,同时计划把必要服务领域的客工转移到更合适的住宿。