Nevertheless, the affordability of flats continues to be a concern, and Workers’ Party remains of the view that the government needs to review the formula of pricing new flats and the recommended length of HDB housing loans.

In addition, the Prime Minister has also acknowledged that there are distressed families who have lost their homes for various reasons. The issue of homeless families is real and has severe ramifications, with possible cross-generational effects. The pending government review into those who are rendered homeless should look into some flexibility of criteria to qualify for rental flats and more than two concessionary loans.

Workers’ Party’s response in full HERE.

***

However, we note with disappointment that important issue of population growth target remain unaddressed.

It has been recognised that much of the angst felt by Singaporeans – high property prices, congestion on the roads and public transport, overload at polyclinics and public hospitals – is caused by our infrastructure not keeping up with the population growth. The Government can fight the fire now by increasing the number of BTO flats and buses, but without addressing the root of the problem, which is the lack of co-ordination between population planning and infrastructure planning, such problems could recur and there is no basis for infrastructure planners to judge if the additional supply will be adequate. This Rally speech has chosen to ignore the elephant in the room. We need a sustainable long term population plan, one that takes into account not only economic considerations, but also social ones.

National Solidarity Party’s response in full HERE.

***

The SPP believes that when we Singaporeans ask for “Singaporeans First”, what we really want is “People First”. This means that the government’s first priority should be the wellbeing of its common citizens; that those of us who are able, should look after those who are not. It is an obligation that starts with the government, and is to be then complemented by able citizens.

The ruling party presently sees any measure directly helping common people but which reduces government revenue or increases costs as a “Populist” policy to be assiduously avoided, and but a “necessary evil” to appease a restive electorate. This is borne out in its failure to change any of its existing policies, merely adjusting the parameters of the policies, like raising the HDB income ceiling and using old-HDB blocks slated for en-bloc as rental HDB flats.

As our GDP and the number of millionaires in Singapore reach record levels, the CDCs are reporting record numbers of Singaporeans seeking financial aid. Singapore urgently needs a government with a “People First” outlook. We propose how this looks in key areas of Housing, Transport, Economic Development and Education.

Singapore People’s Party’s response in full HERE.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

《慈母舰》采访普杰立视频出现政党标志、宣传政策 本地导演质问资媒局:是否抵触《电影法》?

本地电影导演施忠明在脸书发文分享,他今早电邮致函资讯通信媒体发展局(IMDA),向后者询问本地英语网络媒体“慈母舰”制作的一段视频,因其内容呈现政党标志、有政治人物宣传政治课题,是否抵触了《电影法》禁止制作政党政治影片的条文? 新加坡英语网络媒体“慈母舰”(Mothership sg)日前录制视频,采访交通部高级政务部长普杰立医生,内容谈及陆路交通规划和2040年陆路交通发展总蓝图。 由于普杰立的父亲多米尼克(Dominic Puthucheary),曾是社阵政治人物,视频中的快问快答访谈,不免询问普杰立,行动党和社阵,会如何选择。后者则回答选行动党,不过他说很久以前两者过去曾在一起(指社阵领袖原一同创立行动党,惟后来因政见不同离开)。 针对这段视频,施忠明质疑,既然这是“慈母舰”拍摄、并非政府创作的视频,就不能在《电影法》下的第40条文被豁免(只有政府指示或发行的影片可豁免)。 而根据新加坡《电影法》第33条文,私自制作政党政治影片是被违法的。在该条文下,任何人进口、制作、发行或放映政党政治影片即属犯罪,可面对不超过10万元的罚款或监禁不超过两年。 施忠明认为,上述视频里又出现偏驳政治立场、政治人物推介政治课题、出现政党标志等等。 ”敢问有关视频是否已送交(资媒局)进行分级?在电影法第33条文下,会否被归类为政党政治影片?“他在电邮中如是质问资媒局。 2015年民主党拍《白衣牌洗衣粉》视频 此外,施忠明也在贴文中附上2015年的一个案例,那时资媒局指民主党制作的一段诙谐讽刺短片,根据《电影法》定义乃是政党政治影片。 对此民主党领导徐顺全批评资媒局选择性地诠释该法,因为政府也有以漫画的形式,借中国寓言和歌舞等来生动描绘建国一代配套和终身健保等重要政策。…

王瑞杰告诉外媒:淡马锡和政府投资公司 没任人唯亲问题

在上周五(本月17日),副总理兼财政部长王瑞杰接受瑞士媒体《新苏黎世报》(Neue Zürcher Zeitung)专访,被问及尽管新加坡有选举制度,但仍一党专政的问题。 《新苏黎世报》问道,“难道现在还不是开放更多民主与政治竞争的成熟时机吗?” 对此王瑞杰则辩护,新加坡拥有自由公平的选举制度,许多政党都有角逐上届选举,其中行动党有五名国会议员席位失守。 “这算是民主吗?我觉得是。而我们也确实尊重这个结果。事实上,我们执政党多年来赢得选举,与压迫无关,而是因为我们谨遵承诺,也赢得新加坡公民的信任。” 《新苏黎世报》接著追问,王瑞杰是否认为新加坡更适合一党专政,而且该如何避免因一党专政,而带来任人唯亲的问题。 王瑞杰则强调,果断的治理和领导能力至关重要。 “就好比我们国家,拥有自己的主权财富基金淡马锡控股和新加坡政府投资公司(GIC),作为财政部长我不曾干预过他们的投资决策。这是因为如果我干预,将没办法确保他们对自身的表现负责。”王瑞杰说。 他续指,“在宪法下,身为财政部长,我必须向国会负责;而我则必须要求主权基金的领导者负责。我们有严格的规章对付裙带关系,以及强硬打击贪腐的律法。” 王瑞杰:新加坡需建立和谐团结氛围 当被问及目前新加坡面临的何种挑战时,他则回答,最大的挑战是建立于维持“和谐与团结”的氛围,尤其现在全世界面临巨大与快速的改变。…

Temasek Holding’s rebuts claim that CEO Ho Ching earns a salary of S$99 million a year

In a statement on Sunday (19 April), state-owned investment management firm Temasek…

Who’s telling the truth about HDB flat sizes?

~ by Ng E-Jay ~ So, who is really telling the truth…