To understand Singapore’s new politics is to appreciate the deep commitment of Singaporeans for a better future for their country. This bond united PAP and opposition supporters alike. The election served to build national solidarity, while simultaneously sending a clear signal to the PAP that its mold of politics is outdated. The PAP is being called to move out of its narrow focus on economic growth and adopt more inclusive social policies, to incorporate more soul and re-strengthen its moral legitimacy.

The other election driver was more support for checks and balances. Polling during the campaign reported that a majority of Singaporeans saw the main opposition party, the Workers’ Party, as credible, and the results showed that more voters were willing to put the opposition into parliament. What the six opposition parties lacked was name recognition, quality candidates and media exposure. Nevertheless, there is now greater openness to alternatives within Singaporean politics than ever before.

The question is why did Singaporeans move away from the trusted PAP incumbent? Many point to a growing divide between the PAP elite and its grassroots base. There is a sense of inflexibility, a lack of empathy for everyday challenges in a system where people are expected to follow and be talked at, rather than genuinely engaged. In an era where globally people are being heard like never before, it is not enough just to rely on an elite cadre with blind faith. With the opposition fielding highly qualified candidates, many seen as accessible, the argument that the PAP was the best slate was challenged. Analysts also point to the emergence of different sources of information, highlighting the social media and the internet as mediums for alternative discourse. There is also the role of the youth, Generation Y, as having a more liberal outlook supporting alternatives and demanding a more responsive PAP. Combined, these factors all influenced results.

There is more going on, however. The era of strong man politics in Singapore is ending; a phenomenon that has already affected other countries throughout Asia.

______________________________________
Read the entire article HERE.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Report: Singapore banks financed up to SG$1.9 billion to companies linked with haze-causing fires in Indonesia

Indonesia has just experienced yet another year of catastrophic fires that have…

Netizens express concerns after four new COVID-19 community cases test ‘preliminary positive’ for double mutant from India

On Sunday (9 May), Singapore recorded 10 new community cases of COVID-19,…

徐芳达斥推立国一代配套非为选举 未直面毕丹星落实永久普及化乐龄护理建议

工人党党魁暨阿裕尼集选区议员毕丹星,在昨日的国会参与2019年财政预算案辩论,提出政府应落实永久性的乐龄医疗护理配套,让国人只要年满60岁,就能自动享有一系列的基本医疗津贴。 毕丹星指出,他收集了民间的反馈,指出有民众认为由于建国一代和立国一代配套生效的时间点不同,一些特定出生年份者在间中纪念无法从这些配套受惠。 他认为,更为实质使年长者受惠的方案,应该推行永久性的乐龄医疗护理配套,只要国人年满60岁,就自动享有包括:常见/慢性疾病看诊的津贴、到综合诊所或专科诊所都能享有看诊折扣等等。 “政府理应有能力落实全面性医疗保障” 同时,他也指出,现在的政府也理应有能力承担较为普及化的乐龄医保配套。他举例,淡马锡控股在2016年的净投资回报贡献(NIRC)框架下,为国家贡献高达50亿新元的可观年收入。而从本届政府任期开始,五年内预计能贡献250亿新元。 他补充,从2016年起,NIRC增加35巴仙,也可说明本届政府一直保持着健康的增长盈余。故此,他也顺水推舟询问,政府是否应该从这些客观盈余中拨出更多用在社会开支上。 他更指出,如果可以做到这点,那么就不能以“不诚实、不合理、不谨慎”来推托不去落实永久性的医保配套。全民普及化的计划,甚至可以成为团结国家的顶梁柱。 目前,只有低收入国人、建国一代和立国一代年长者,在社区医疗辅助计划下受惠。 徐芳达:已推出针对特定年龄群津贴 对于毕丹星的建议,贸工部兼教育部高级政务部长徐芳达反驳,除了一些提供给特定年龄群的配套,政府已提供各种医疗津贴,包括给中低收入者和特定年长者的各类津贴。 他表示,国人到综合诊所就诊都能享有津贴,而年长者受惠更多。此外,还有终身健保为国人提供医疗保险,助他们抵消高额住院费,以及给低收入和中等收入国人提供保费津贴和额外的保费援助。 另一方面,工人党非选区议员吴佩松,指出政府推出终身健保和终身互保,意味着国人年迈时只能互相扶持,为彼此买单,承担住院费和残障费用等,但政府得以省下医疗护理开支。…